Evaluates end-to-end performance of HPC systems for scientific machine learning, focusing on data staging, I/O efficiency, and model convergence under massive dataset constraints. It measures how well systems handle large-scale volumetric and high-resolution image workloads while meeting strict accuracy targets. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CosmoFlow, DeepCAM, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports MAE, IOU.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill mlperf-hpc-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Mlperf Hpc Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-mlperf-hpc-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: mlperf-hpc-eval
description: Evaluates end-to-end performance of HPC systems for scientific machine learning, focusing on data staging, I/O efficiency, and model convergence under massive dataset constraints. It measures how well systems handle large-scale volumetric and high-resolution image workloads while meeting strict accuracy targets. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CosmoFlow, DeepCAM, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports MAE, IOU.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2110.11466
bibtex_key: farrell2021mlperf
confidence: high
---
# mlperf-hpc-eval
> MLPerf HPC: A Holistic Benchmark Suite for Scientific Machine Learning on HPC Systems — Farrell et al. (2021) (arXiv:2110.11466, 2021)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates end-to-end performance of HPC systems for scientific machine learning, focusing on data staging, I/O efficiency, and model convergence under massive dataset constraints. It measures how well systems handle large-scale volumetric and high-resolution image workloads while meeting strict accuracy targets.
## Datasets
- **CosmoFlow** — total ?; splits: train (262144), test (65536); repo https://github.com/mlcommons/hpc
- **DeepCAM** — total ?; splits: train (121266), test (15158); repo https://github.com/mlcommons/hpc
## Metrics
- `MAE` **(primary)** — range: [0, inf)
- Mean absolute error between predicted and true cosmological parameters across the test set.
- `IOU` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Intersection-over-Union between predicted segmentation masks and ground truth masks, averaged across classes.
## Input / output format
**Input**: CosmoFlow: 3D volumetric cubes of size 128^3 with 4 channels. DeepCAM: 16-channel tensors of size 1152x768.
**Output**: CosmoFlow: 4 predicted cosmological parameters. DeepCAM: 1152x768 segmentation masks for 3 classes.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def score_cosmoflow(y_pred, y_true):
mae = np.mean(np.abs(y_pred - y_true))
assert mae < 0.124, 'Quality target not met'
return mae
def score_deepcam(y_pred, y_true):
intersection = np.sum((y_pred == y_true) & (y_pred > 0), axis=(1,2,3))
union = np.sum((y_pred > 0) | (y_true > 0), axis=(1,2,3))
iou = np.mean(intersection / union)
assert iou > 0.82, 'Quality target not met'
return iou
```
## Common pitfalls
- I/O bottlenecks often dominate end-to-end runtime, making storage and interconnect performance more critical than raw compute throughput.
- Runs are only valid if the strict quality targets (MAE < 0.124 or IOU > 0.82) are met; otherwise, timing measurements are discarded.
- CosmoFlow requires splitting 512^3 volumes into 128^3 cubes due to memory constraints, which affects data loading and parallelism strategies.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> The target quality is chosen to be mean-absolute-error (MAE) < 0.124 when scaling the batch size and learning rate above the reference configuration. CosmoFlow training exhibited high variability in the number of epochs to converge, which motivated a requirement of 10 training runs to get a reliable measurement of the time to train. ... The target score is the intersection-over-union (IOU) between the predictions and the targets. The scientifically motivated target score is 0.82, which corresponds to a similarity of 82%.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{farrell2021mlperf,
title={MLPerf HPC: A Holistic Benchmark Suite for Scientific Machine Learning on HPC Systems},
author={Farrell et al. (2021)},
year={2021},
note={arXiv:2110.11466}
}
```
- arXiv: 2110.11466
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!