Use when the user wants the existing codebase analyzed for planning — 'mapear o código', 'analisar o projeto', 'atualizar o contexto', 'map codebase' — or when a planning skill reports a missing or stale map. Runs a deterministic read-only evidence scan and writes codebase.md plus the architecture, conventions, testing and concerns context documents under .planning/feat/. Do NOT use for code review (feat-review), architecture decisions, or writing the project instructions file (feat-setup).
Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding
Scanned 9/28/2026
npx -y skills add pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace --skill feat-map --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Feat Map?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/pwdev-solucoes-feat-map)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: feat-map
description: >
Use when the user wants the existing codebase analyzed for planning — 'mapear o código',
'analisar o projeto', 'atualizar o contexto', 'map codebase' — or when a planning skill
reports a missing or stale map. Runs a deterministic read-only evidence scan and writes
codebase.md plus the architecture, conventions, testing and concerns context documents under
.planning/feat/. Do NOT use for code review (feat-review), architecture decisions, or writing
the project instructions file (feat-setup).
metadata:
version: 3.2.1
---
# Map the codebase
Contract: `references/mapping.md`. The scanner owns traversal, secret exclusion and
determinism; you own interpretation and the context documents. Read-only on source code.
## Procedure
1. **Language** — resolve `lang` (`references/language.md`).
2. **Scan** — `python3 "<plugin-root>/scripts/feat_map.py" --repo-root . --write`. Report the
`source_commit`, the previous map's staleness and `excluded_sensitive`. Commands in the
output are evidence only — never run them.
3. **Interpret** — sample 2–3 representative files per module kind (entry points, a
controller/handler, a service, a model, a component, a test) and read the style and test
configs listed by the scan. Read the project instructions file if present. Do not read the
whole repository.
4. **Dependency audit (optional)** — ask the human before running `npm audit` /
`composer audit` / equivalent (they may hit the network). Declined → record `n/a`.
5. **Write** from `templates/context/*.md` and `templates/codebase.md`, keeping headings and
keys; every claim cites its evidence path(s) and a confidence:
- `.planning/feat/context/architecture.md`, `conventions.md`, `testing.md` (including
`tests_dir`, `e2e_scenarios_dir`, `e2e_generated_dir` and the real commands),
`concerns.md`;
- `.planning/feat/codebase.md` — the one-screen index (kept for 2.x compatibility).
6. Record: `sh "<plugin-root>/scripts/audit-log.sh" event map "" completed .planning/feat/context/`.
7. **Summary**:
```
🗺️ Codebase mapped at {short commit}
Stack: {summary} | Pattern: {pattern} ({confidence})
Size: {N} files, {N} modules | Tests: {frameworks} ({N} files) | E2E: {playwright|none}
Risk areas: {top 3}
📁 .planning/feat/codebase.md + context/{architecture,conventions,testing,concerns}.md
👉 Next: feat-setup (if no project instructions file) or feat-feature "description"
```
## Prohibitions
- Never modify project source files — the only writes are under `.planning/feat/`.
- Never read secrets (the scanner skips them; do not open them by hand either) or copy any
secret value into the documents.
- Never state a convention without an evidence path.
Language: resolve `lang` per `references/language.md` before any human-facing output. Safety: never read or expose `.env*` (except `.env.example`/`.template`/`.sample`), keys, certificates or credentials — `references/safety.md`. Paths `references/`, `scripts/`, `templates/`, `schemas/` are relative to the plugin root (`references/runtime.md`).
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!