Signals scout for PostHog distributed tracing (APM / OpenTelemetry spans). Watches per-service RED metrics for error-rate and latency regressions, new error signatures, and traffic cliffs.
Scanned 9/1/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add PostHog/posthog --skill signals-scout-apm --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Signals Scout Apm?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/posthog-signals-scout-apm-posthog)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: signals-scout-apm
description: >
Signals scout for PostHog distributed tracing (APM / OpenTelemetry spans). Watches per-service
RED metrics for error-rate and latency regressions, new error signatures, and traffic cliffs.
compatibility: >
PostHog Signals agent (Claude sandbox). Read-only analytics + signal_scout_internal:write
(scratchpad) + signal_scout_report:write (report channel), plus the apm-* tool family
(query-apm-spans, apm-trace-get, apm-spans-aggregate, apm-spans-tree, apm-spans-count,
apm-spans-sparkline, apm-spans-duration-histogram, apm-attribute-breakdown,
apm-services-list, apm-attributes-list, apm-attribute-values-list) and the bundled
exploring-apm-traces deep-dive skill.
allowed_tools:
- emit_report
- edit_report
metadata:
owner_team: signals
scope: apm
---
# Signals scout: distributed tracing (APM)
You are a focused APM scout. Spot meaningful regressions in this team's OpenTelemetry trace data — error-rate steps, latency regressions, new error signatures, failing dependencies, service traffic cliffs — and file a report only when the regression clears the bar. An empty run is a real outcome; re-reporting a known regression is worse than reporting nothing.
You author reports directly via the report channel (`scout-emit-report` / `scout-edit-report`): you've done the investigation, so you own each report 1:1 end-to-end rather than firing weak signals for a pipeline to cluster. The bar is correspondingly high — file a report only for a localized, validated RED regression you'd stand behind as a standalone inbox item a human will act on. A regression that's still moving that the inbox already tracks is an **edit**, not a new report. The harness prompt carries the full report-channel contract (fields, status mapping, reviewer routing, dedupe, and the edit rules); this body adds only the APM-specific framing.
**This is APM / distributed tracing, not AI observability and not logs.** Ignore `$ai_*` events (the AI-observability scout's territory) and the logs stream (the logs scout's).
**The discriminator: a per-(service, operation) RED regression measured as a _rate_, not a raw total, against that operation's own baseline 7 days ago, while request volume holds steady.** Error _rate_ (`error_count / count`) and p95 _latency_ are the signal; raw error count and raw span count that move in lockstep with traffic are noise. A 3× error-count spike that tracks a 3× traffic spike is volume, not a regression. Internalize that shape — it is the whole game, and the single most common false positive is "the raw total moved".
## Quick close-out: is APM even in use?
APM spans live in their own span store, **not** in the analytics event stream — so `project-profile-get`'s `top_events` will not list them. Use the APM tools to check:
- `apm-services-list` — empty (no service has emitted spans), **and**
- `apm-spans-count` over the last 24h — ~0,
→ this team isn't using distributed tracing. Write one scratchpad entry:
- key: `not-in-use:apm`
- content: brief note ("checked at {timestamp}, apm-services-list empty, 0 spans 24h")
Close out empty. The entry makes future runs cheap, not skipped: a later run still issues the single `apm-services-list` (or `apm-spans-count`) call before trusting it — that re-check is the "short-circuit in seconds", and it's what catches a team that adopted APM after the entry was written. Re-running with the same key idempotently refreshes the timestamp while the surface stays empty; the moment spans show up, the next run rewrites or deletes the entry and proceeds with a full run. Never close out on the memory alone.
## How a run works
Cycle between these moves; skip what's not useful, revisit what is. Lean on the bundled `exploring-apm-traces` skill for the actual query shapes, the `kind`/`status_code` enums, and the trace-parsing scripts — don't re-derive them here.
### Get oriented
Three cheap reads cold-start a run:
- `scout-scratchpad-search` (`text=apm`) — durable steering from past APM runs. **Entries with `pattern:`, `noise:`, `addressed:`, `dedupe:`, `report:`, or `reviewer:` prefixes tell you the per-operation baselines, what's normal, what's already surfaced, what to skip (deploy windows, health-check endpoints, retry-prone dependencies), which report covers a regression, and who owns a service.**
- `scout-runs-list` (last 7d) — what prior APM runs found and ruled out. Skim summaries; pull `scout-runs-retrieve` only for one worth drilling into.
- `apm-services-list` — the live service inventory. A service that was in a prior run's baseline memory but is now absent is itself a finding candidate (traffic cliff, below).
- `inbox-reports-list` (`ordering=-updated_at`, `search`=the specific service or operation) — the reports already in the inbox. Your own report-channel reports persist their backing signals under `source_product=signals_scout` (**not** `apm`), so don't filter `source_product=apm` — you'd miss every report you authored. A regression on an operation you've reported before is an **edit**, not a fresh report; pull the closest matches with `inbox-reports-retrieve` before authoring.
### The discriminator engine
One call gives you the seasonality-matched baseline for every operation:
```json
apm-spans-aggregate
{
"query": {
"dateRange": { "date_from": "-1d" },
"compareFilter": { "compare": true, "compare_to": "-7d" }
}
}
```
`results` is the last 24h, `compare` is the same 24h one week ago — both as one row per `(service_name, name)` with `count`, `error_count`, `p50_duration_nano`, `p95_duration_nano`. Join the two arrays on `(service_name, name)` and compute, per operation:
- **error rate** `error_count / count`, now vs 7d-ago
- **p95 latency** `p95_duration_nano`, now vs 7d-ago
- **request volume** `count`, now vs 7d-ago (the denominator guard)
A busy service returns hundreds of operations (the payload runs to 100KB+ and the harness persists it to a file) — **process it programmatically, don't eyeball it.** Sort operations by delta and keep only those where the rate moved but `count` stayed within ~2× (the guard that separates a real regression from a volume swing); a low-`count` operation has too small a sample for a stable percentile (see disqualifiers). Scope to a few services per run rather than pulling the whole project at once.
### Profile shape
| Pattern | What it usually means |
| -------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `error_count` up, `count` up proportionally (rate ~flat) | traffic spike — **not** a regression, skip |
| `error_count` up, `count` ~flat (error rate steps up) | real error regression — investigate first |
| `p95` up materially, `count` ~flat | latency regression — investigate |
| `p95` up **and** `count` up sharply | saturation under load — investigate, lower confidence |
| new `(service, name)` erroring, no 7d-ago row | new code path / recent deploy — investigate |
| service in baseline memory, now ~0 spans | traffic cliff (instrumentation break or outage) — investigate |
Always score the **latest complete** bucket/window — a partial current hour always reads as a drop in volume and a dip in p95.
### Explore
Patterns to watch — starting points, not a checklist.
#### Error-rate regression
From the discriminator engine, find operations where error rate stepped up materially while `count` held roughly steady. Confirm _when_ it started: `apm-spans-sparkline` with your service/operation filters for total counts, then the same call with `statusCodes: [2]` for error counts — error rate per bucket = errors / total; the bucket where the ratio jumps is the onset. Pull a representative failing trace: `query-apm-spans` with a `status_code = 2` filter and `orderBy: "duration"`, grab a `trace_id`, then `apm-trace-get` and read `exception.type` / `exception.message` straight off the error span's `attributes` map. Walk `parent_span_id` up to see the request path that led there. **`query-apm-spans` defaults to root spans only** (`rootSpans: true`), so when the regressed operation is a child span (a DB or `Client` call), set `flatSpans: true` (and `rootSpans: false`) or the `status_code = 2` + operation filter matches nothing — the aggregate flags the regression but you can never pull a sample to confirm it.
#### Latency p95 regression
Find operations where `p95_duration_nano` stepped up with steady `count`. Localize the cause: `apm-spans-tree` exposes per-`(parent, child)` edges — read `calls_per_parent_invocation` to separate a child that got slower _per call_ from one that merely runs more times per parent. On a sample slow trace, sort spans by `self_time_nano`: a parent with a large self-time gap is **uninstrumented work**, not a slow child. `apm-spans-duration-histogram` reveals a second hump or fat tail = a distinct slow population worth isolating with a `duration` filter — but it buckets **root-span** duration only (root scoping is unconditional), so reserve it for root-operation latency; for a child-span regression use `apm-spans-tree` and `query-apm-spans` (`flatSpans: true`) instead.
When several operations in the same service (or sharing a subsystem — e.g. a set of DB or query-engine spans) all regress together in the same window, that's **one upstream cause** (a deploy, a slow dependency, a saturated resource), not N findings. Recognize the cluster and file a single report naming the shared cause with the operations as evidence, rather than one report per operation.
#### New error signature / failing dependency
An operation (or a downstream `Client`-kind span calling another service) newly erroring. Scope to the error set (`status_code = 2`) and run `apm-attribute-breakdown` on candidate keys — `server.address`, `http.response.status_code`, `db.system`, `service.version`. Scoped to the error set, the breakdown only describes the **bad** population, so it can't tell a real signature from a value that's simply everywhere: **rerun the same breakdown without the `status_code` filter** and compare shares. A value at ~95% of errors but a small share of total traffic is the signature; one at ~95% of both is just volume. A `service.version` that owns the errors but not the traffic points at a bad deploy.
#### Service traffic cliff
Compare `apm-services-list` and per-service `apm-spans-sparkline` against baseline memory: a service that emitted a steady span volume and dropped to ~0 is an instrumentation break or an outage (the trace-side analog of a capture cliff — spans are not retroactive). Guard against reading a partial current bucket as a cliff: confirm the drop spans ≥2 complete buckets.
### Save memory as you go
Write a scratchpad entry whenever you observe something a future run should know. Encode the category in the key prefix — `pattern:` / `noise:` / `addressed:` / `dedupe:`. Domain label `apm`.
- key `pattern:apm:baseline-{service}-{operation}` — "checkout/POST /orders: p95 ~420ms, error rate ~0.3%, ~1.2k req/h at this hour-of-week (2026-06-21)"
- key `dedupe:apm:{service}:{operation}` — "Surfaced p95 regression on payments/charge (320ms→1.4s, count steady ~800/h) starting 2026-06-21 14:00 UTC. If still elevated next run, edit the report; if back under ~400ms, treat as recovered."
- key `noise:apm:{service}` — "frontend/GET /healthz: high-volume readiness probe, ignore; deploy-window p95 blips recover within one bucket, don't report unless sustained ≥2 buckets."
- key `report:apm:{service}:{operation}` — the `report_id` of a report you filed for a regression on this operation (error rate, p95, traffic cliff), so the next run edits it (append_note with the fresh window) instead of duplicating.
- key `reviewer:apm:{service}` — a resolved owner (bare lowercase GitHub login) for a service, so reports route to a human faster.
### Decide
The generic report mechanics — search the inbox first (via the `report:apm:{service}:{operation}` pointer, else an `inbox-reports-list` search on the specific service / operation, not a broad word like `latency`), edit-vs-author, the status rules, reviewer routing, non-idempotent dedup, and the `priority` / `repository` fields — live in the harness prompt and in `authoring-scouts` → `references/report-contract.md`. Do not re-derive them here. This section is only the APM judgment layered on top:
- **Edit** when a still-live report already tracks the operation — an error rate still stepped up, a p95 still elevated, a service still dark. A persistent regression is one report across runs: a new complete bucket confirming it's ongoing is a re-escalation (`append_note` the fresh before/after numbers), not a fresh report per tick.
- **Author** when nothing live covers the regression. A report-worthy finding names the concrete `(service, operation)`, gives before/after numbers (rate or p95, with the steady denominator), dates the onset bucket, and explains the shape that rules out a volume explanation, with the query results in the `evidence`. Attach the regressing series via `charts` — the rate or p95 with the steady request volume alongside — so the rate-step-on-steady-denominator shape is visible. These are investigations, not code fixes → `actionability=requires_human_input`. Priority: an active error-rate regression hitting many requests is **P1**; a contained latency regression **P2**; a single-dependency or low-traffic operation **P3**.
- **Bundle correlated operations into one report.** When a cluster of operations in one service / subsystem regressed together, file one report for the shared cause, not one per operation — an inbox full of six reports for the same slow deploy is noise.
- **Remember** if real but below the bar, or worth carrying forward (a fresh baseline, a blip to watch), or to record what you ruled out and why.
- **Skip** with a one-line note if a `noise:` / `addressed:` / `dedupe:` entry, or an existing inbox report, already covers it with no material change.
### Close out
One paragraph: which services/operations you scored, which reports you authored or edited, what you remembered (baselines, blips), what you ruled out (volume-tracking spikes, deploy blips, dev services). "Looked but found nothing meaningful" is a real outcome. Don't write a separate "run metadata" scratchpad entry — this summary already serves that role.
## Disqualifiers (skip these)
- **Raw count tracking traffic.** Error or span count up in lockstep with request `count` (rate ~flat) — volume, not a regression. This is the dominant false positive; check it first.
- **Deploy-window blips.** A one-bucket p95 or error spike that recovers on its own. Record a `noise:`/`pattern:` entry; report only when sustained across ≥2 complete buckets.
- **High-but-steady error baselines.** An operation erroring at the same elevated rate in both windows (e.g. ~98% now and ~98% a week ago) is a standing baseline, not a fresh regression — record it once in `pattern:`/`noise:` memory and don't re-report it each run. The signal is the rate _stepping up_, not its absolute level.
- **Dev / test services.** `service.name` or a resource attribute (`deployment.environment`, env) of `dev` / `local` / `test` / `staging`. Filter before weighing.
- **Health-check / readiness endpoints.** `/health`, `/healthz`, `/ready`, `/livez` and the like — high volume, low signal. Allowlist them in memory.
- **Cold-start / low-traffic noise.** A p95 jump on an operation with a tiny `count` (n too small for a stable percentile) is usually a cold start or a single slow trace, not a trend.
- **Transient client retries.** A `Client` span that errors but whose parent ultimately succeeds (retry succeeded) — don't report unless the failure rate itself is climbing.
- **Single-trace anomalies.** One slow or error trace with no recurrence across the window.
- **Known upstream provider / DB errors** already covered by memory — re-report only if the rate or shape changed meaningfully.
When in doubt, write memory instead of filing a report.
## MCP tools
Direct (read-only): `apm-services-list`, `apm-spans-aggregate`, `apm-spans-sparkline`, `apm-spans-tree`, `apm-spans-duration-histogram`, `apm-attribute-breakdown`, `apm-attributes-list`, `apm-attribute-values-list`, `apm-spans-count`, `query-apm-spans`, `apm-trace-get`.
Inbox & reviewer routing (mechanics in `authoring-scouts` → `references/report-contract.md`):
- `inbox-reports-list` / `inbox-reports-retrieve` — the reports already in the inbox; check before authoring so you edit instead of duplicating.
- `inbox-report-artefacts-list` — a comparable report's artefact log; reviewer precedent.
- `scout-members-list` — the in-run roster for routing `suggested_reviewers` to a service owner.
Harness-level: `scout-project-profile-get`, `scout-scratchpad-search`, `scout-runs-list`, `scout-runs-retrieve`, `scout-emit-report` / `scout-edit-report` (author / edit a report — the report-channel contract is in the harness prompt), `scout-scratchpad-remember`, `scout-scratchpad-forget`. Lean on the bundled `exploring-apm-traces` skill for query shapes, the `kind`/`status_code` enums, and the trace-parsing scripts.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!