Audit the health of a PostHog project's data warehouse sources and syncs — find every broken or degraded source connection, sync schema, and webhook channel. Use when the user asks "why are my imports failing?", "what's broken with my sources?", "why is my warehouse data stale?", or wants a one-shot triage of source/sync health before deciding where to dig in. Produces a prioritized report grouped by severity, with recommended next steps. For materialized-view health use `auditing-warehouse-v...
Scanned 9/1/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add PostHog/posthog --skill auditing-warehouse-source-health --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Auditing Warehouse Source Health?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/posthog-auditing-warehouse-source-health-posthog)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: auditing-warehouse-source-health
description: >
Audit the health of a PostHog project's data warehouse sources and syncs — find every broken or degraded source
connection, sync schema, and webhook channel. Use when the user asks "why are my imports failing?", "what's broken
with my sources?", "why is my warehouse data stale?", or wants a one-shot triage of source/sync health before
deciding where to dig in. Produces a prioritized report grouped by severity, with recommended next steps. For
materialized-view health use `auditing-warehouse-view-health`; for a single failing sync use
`diagnosing-failed-warehouse-syncs`.
---
# Auditing data warehouse source health
This skill produces a project-wide audit of the **source and sync** side of the data warehouse pipeline — source
connections, sync schemas, and webhook push channels. Use it when the user wants a **summary of what's broken with
their imports**, not a deep-dive on one sync. The deep-dive on individual failures is
`diagnosing-failed-warehouse-syncs`; this skill is the scan that tells them where to look first.
The same underlying endpoint (`data-warehouse-data-health-issues-retrieve`) also reports materialized-view,
batch-export-destination, and transformation issues. Materialized views are covered by
`auditing-warehouse-view-health`. Destinations (batch exports) and transformations are owned by other products — surface
them if they appear, but route them to the relevant team rather than diagnosing here.
## When to use this skill
- "Why are my imports failing?" / "What's broken with my sources?"
- "Why is my warehouse data stale?"
- The user is new to a project and wants to know which sources they've inherited and whether they're healthy
- Weekly or monthly review of source/sync health
- Dashboards are stale and the user isn't sure which source is at fault
## Available tools
| Tool | Purpose |
| --------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| `data-warehouse-data-health-issues-retrieve` | One-shot: all failed/degraded items across the whole pipeline |
| `external-data-sources-list` | All sources with status and latest error |
| `external-data-schemas-list` | All schemas with status, last_synced_at, latest_error |
| `external-data-sources-webhook-info-retrieve` | Check per-source webhook state (not covered by data-health-issues) |
The `data-health-issues` endpoint aggregates across the whole pipeline — it's the fastest path to a summary. Filter
its results to the `source` and `external_data_sync` types for this audit. Use the list endpoints when you need more
context than the summary provides (row counts, non-failing items, schema-level detail).
## What counts as a source/sync "issue"
From the data-health endpoint, this audit cares about two of the five categories:
| `type` | Trigger | Typical urgency |
| -------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------- |
| `source` | `ExternalDataSource.status = Error` — whole source connection broken | High |
| `external_data_sync` | schema in Failed or BillingLimitReached state (the data-health endpoint returns `status: "failed"` or `status: "billing_limit"` respectively) | Medium–High |
Each entry includes `id`, `name`, `type`, `status`, `error`, `failed_at`, `url`, and `source_type`.
The other categories the endpoint returns are out of scope for this skill:
- `materialized_view` → `auditing-warehouse-view-health`
- `destination` (batch export) → owned by the batch exports / data pipelines product
- `transformation` (HogFunction) → owned by the CDP / ingestion side
Note the data-health endpoint only reports _active failures_. For source/sync health it doesn't flag:
- Schemas paused by the user (`should_sync = false`)
- Schemas that are slow or stale but technically `Completed`
- **Webhook problems on `sync_type: "webhook"` schemas.** The bulk-sync safety net can succeed while the webhook
push channel is silently broken (deregistered, disabled on the remote side, failing signature verification).
These don't surface in `data-health-issues` — check per-source with `webhook-info-retrieve`.
If the user asks about staleness or unused items, reach beyond this endpoint — see Step 4.
## Workflow
### Step 1 — One-shot pull
Call `data-warehouse-data-health-issues-retrieve` and keep the `source` and `external_data_sync` entries.
If there are no source/sync issues, tell the user their sources are healthy and stop. Don't invent problems.
### Step 2 — Group and prioritize
1. **Sources in Error first.** A source failure cascades — every schema under it is effectively dead until the
source reconnects. Fix these first.
2. **Sync schemas next**, in this order:
- `status: "billing_limit"` entries (billing issue, non-technical — flag and route to billing)
- `Failed` on heavily-used tables (user asks / check row counts via schemas-list if needed)
- `Failed` on less-used tables
### Step 3 — Present the audit
Render a prioritized report. Don't dump the raw JSON — human-readable table per category:
```text
## Data warehouse source health — 4 issues
### 🔴 Sources (1)
- Stripe — authentication failed (failed 2h ago). All 8 tables under it are currently dead.
→ `diagnosing-failed-warehouse-syncs` on this source
### 🟠 Sync schemas (3)
- postgres_prod.orders (Failed 6h ago) — column "updated_at" does not exist
- postgres_prod.invoices (Failed 6h ago) — column "updated_at" does not exist
- hubspot.contacts (BillingLimitReached) — team quota exceeded
Recommended order:
1. Stripe auth (everything under it is dead)
2. Schema-drift on postgres_prod.orders / invoices — looks like upstream renamed a column
3. Billing limit on hubspot
```
The exact format is less important than: prioritized, grouped, actionable, and hinting at the right next skill.
### Step 4 — Go beyond active failures (when asked)
If the user wants more than just "what's on fire" — e.g. "what else should I look at?" — cross-check:
**Stale but "Completed" schemas:**
Call `external-data-schemas-list` and look for schemas with old `last_synced_at` relative to their `sync_frequency`.
A schema on `1hour` frequency that last synced 3 days ago is effectively broken even if status says `Completed`.
**Sources with zero sync activity:**
Sources where every schema has `should_sync: false` or `status = Paused`. These were set up and then abandoned —
candidates for cleanup via `external-data-sources-destroy`.
**Broken webhooks on webhook-type schemas:**
Iterate the sources that have any schema with `sync_type: "webhook"` (visible via `external-data-schemas-list`). For
each, call `external-data-sources-webhook-info-retrieve({source_id})`:
- `exists: false` while a schema is `sync_type: "webhook"` → webhook was never registered, or was deleted. Push
channel is dead; only the bulk fallback is ingesting.
- `external_status.error` present → remote service is reporting a problem (permission revoked, endpoint
deleted on their dashboard).
- `external_status.status` not `"enabled"` → remote has disabled the endpoint (often after repeated delivery
failures).
Report these separately from the primary audit — they're a different shape of problem than failed syncs, and the fix
is a different skill (`diagnosing-failed-warehouse-syncs` scenario I, or `setting-up-a-data-warehouse-source` step
5.5).
Only run these extra checks if the user explicitly asks for a broader audit — they involve more tool calls and
heuristics.
### Step 5 — Offer the next step
End the audit with a clear hand-off:
- "Want me to dig into the Stripe failure?" → hands off to `diagnosing-failed-warehouse-syncs`
- "Want me to fix the schema drift on orders?" → hands off to `tuning-incremental-sync-config`
- "Want to disable the billing-capped schemas?" → one-click via `external-data-schemas-partial-update`
Never start applying fixes autonomously from an audit — the audit's job is to report and recommend, not remediate.
Any fix should be confirmed explicitly before executing.
## Important notes
- **The audit is read-only.** Never call destructive tools from the audit flow. Hand off to the diagnosis/tuning
skills — which in turn confirm before acting.
- **Empty = healthy.** Don't pad an empty audit with hypothetical issues. "No source issues found" is a good answer.
- **Source failures cascade.** When reporting a source in Error, also mention which schemas under it are affected
(or will be, once they try to sync again). The user needs to understand the blast radius.
- **Billing limits aren't technical problems.** Flag them but route to billing / quota discussion, not to a
recovery action.
- **`data-health-issues` only surfaces active failures.** For staleness or abandoned sources you need to cross-check
the list endpoints. Only do this when the user explicitly asks for a deeper audit.
- **Webhook health is separate from schema health.** The data-health endpoint doesn't know about webhook state.
When a user's request mentions "real-time", "Stripe webhook", or "why is data hours behind on a webhook
source", go straight to `webhook-info-retrieve` rather than inferring from schema status.
- **Materialized views, destinations, and transformations are out of scope here.** They share the data-health
endpoint but belong to other audits/products — route, don't diagnose.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!