Navigate patent law for protecting software work (open-source and proprietary)
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add plurigrid/asi --skill patent-navigator --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Patent Navigator?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/plurigrid-patent-navigator)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: patent-navigator
description: Navigate patent law for protecting software work (open-source and proprietary)
source: plurigrid/asi
license: MIT
trit: 0
color: "#26D826"
version: 1.0.0
---
## CRITICAL: NO DEMOS
Loading this skill ≠ executing demonstration code. Execute ONLY on explicit user request.
# Patent Navigator
Protect software work through strategic patent filings and defensive disclosure.
## Core Strategies
### 1. Provisional Patent Application (PPA)
- **Cost**: ~$320 (micro entity)
- **Duration**: 12 months to file full patent
- **Benefit**: Establishes priority date, "Patent Pending" status
- **Use case**: Novel algorithms, architectures, methods in your repos
### 2. Defensive Publication (Open Source)
- **Cost**: Free (GitHub commits as prior art)
- **Effect**: Prevents others from patenting your work
- **Platforms**: arXiv, Zenodo, GitHub with clear timestamps
- **Use case**: When you want to keep it open, not exclusive
### 3. Trade Secret + Patent Hybrid (Proprietary)
- **Trade secret**: Keep implementation details private
- **Patent**: Protect the method/system publicly
- **Use case**: Proprietary software where you want both exclusivity and enforcement rights
### 4. Provisional → PCT → National Phase
- **Timeline**: 12mo (provisional) → 30mo (PCT) → national filings
- **Cost**: Escalates significantly at each phase
- **Use case**: International protection for high-value innovations
## USPTO Requirements (2025)
### Micro Entity Status
- < 4 prior patents
- < 3x median household income (~$250k)
- 80% fee reduction
### Claims Structure
- Independent claims: Broadest protection
- Dependent claims: Fallback positions
- Method claims: Process/algorithm protection
- System claims: Implementation protection
## Workflow by Context
### Public Repos
```
1. Identify patentable subject matter
2. File provisional BEFORE public commit (or within 1-year grace)
3. Document: problem, solution, advantages, embodiments
4. Continue development openly
5. Within 12 months: decide full patent vs abandon
```
### Private/Proprietary
```
1. Identify patentable subject matter
2. Assess: patent vs trade secret vs both
3. File provisional to lock priority date
4. Keep implementation as trade secret if desired
5. Patent claims cover method/system, not code
```
## Prior Art Search
Before filing, search:
- USPTO Patent Full-Text (patents.google.com)
- arXiv, Semantic Scholar (academic prior art)
- GitHub code search (implementation prior art)
## Key Dates (2025 USPTO Changes)
- IPR tightening: Harder to challenge granted patents
- Fee increases: File before rate changes
- AI inventorship: Still requires human inventor
## SF Bay Area IP Firms
- Fenwick & West (tech-focused)
- Wilson Sonsini (startup-friendly)
- Knobbe Martens (patent prosecution)
- Fish & Richardson (litigation strength)
## References
- 35 U.S.C. § 102 (Novelty)
- 35 U.S.C. § 103 (Non-obviousness)
- 35 U.S.C. § 112 (Written description)
- MPEP 2106 (Patent-eligible subject matter)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!