Skip to content
Back to skills

Issue

ASecurity

Creates issues from a natural language description — single or batch — and auto-updates related planning and design docs.

  • 11 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added October 9, 2026
developmentpythongobashgitapi

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 9, 2026

npx -y skills add pillip/claude-dev-kit --skill issue --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Issue?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Issue
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/pillip-issue/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/pillip-issue)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: issue
description: Creates issues from a natural language description — single or batch — and auto-updates related planning and design docs.
argument-hint: '[issue description]'
disable-model-invocation: false
allowed-tools: Task, Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Edit, Bash
---
<!-- AUTO-GENERATED by scripts/gen_skills.py — DO NOT EDIT. Edit SKILL.md.tmpl instead. -->

## Kit Preamble — issue

### Kit Script Root
Kit root: `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}`
- Absolute path above → plugin install (substituted at load time; no project
  `scripts/` dir): prefix every kit script command with it, e.g.
  `bash <kit-root>/scripts/checkpoint.sh …`. Absolute paths also work from worktrees.
- Literal `${…}` placeholder above → standalone layout: run commands as written.

### Project Context Detection
Run these checks silently at the start. Use results to adapt behavior:
- `[ -f issues.md ]` — if true, this project uses the sprint system. Respect issue numbering and STATUS.md.
- `[ -f docs/sprint_state.md ]` — if true and Status shows `running`, a sprint is active. Be aware of parallel work in worktrees.
- `[ -f docs/prd_digest.md ]` — if true, read it for quick project context before starting.

### Kit Rules
- Verify `gh auth status` before any GitHub operation.
## Algorithm

### Phase 1 — Context Gathering

1) Read `$ARGUMENTS`. If empty, ask the user for a description and stop.
2) Read `issues.md`. If not found, tell the user to run `/kickoff` first and stop.
3) Parse the highest issue number from `issues.md` using `### ISSUE-(\d+):` regex. Next issue number = max + 1.
4) Read the following docs in **parallel** (skip any that don't exist):
   - `docs/prd_digest.md`
   - `docs/requirements.md`
   - `docs/ux_spec.md`
   - `docs/architecture.md`
   - `docs/data_model.md`
   - `docs/test_plan.md`
   - `docs/design_philosophy.md`
   - `docs/design_system.md`
   - `docs/wireframes.md`
   - `docs/interactions.md`
   - `docs/copy_guide.md`

If none of the planning docs exist, warn the user but proceed with `issues.md` + `STATUS.md` only.

4.5) Set design context flag:
   - `has_design_docs` = `true` if **both** `docs/design_philosophy.md` and `docs/wireframes.md` exist; `false` otherwise.
   - This flag controls whether design doc updates are offered in Phase 2.

### Phase 2 — Doc Update Detection & Scope Estimation

5) Analyze the natural-language description against existing planning docs to determine which docs need updating:

   **Planning docs** (always evaluated):
   - `issues.md` — always
   - `STATUS.md` — always
   - `docs/requirements.md` — when the description introduces requirements not covered by existing FRs/NFRs
   - `docs/ux_spec.md` — when the description involves UI elements, screens, user flows, or interactions
   - `docs/architecture.md` — when the description involves new modules, services, APIs, or infrastructure changes
   - `docs/data_model.md` — when the description involves new entities, fields, or schema changes
   - `docs/test_plan.md` — when the description introduces new test flows or critical paths

   **Design docs** (only when `has_design_docs` is true):
   - `docs/design_system.md` — when the description requires new UI components not in the existing system
   - `docs/wireframes.md` — when the description introduces new screens or significantly modifies existing screen layouts
   - `docs/interactions.md` — when the description introduces new user flows, transitions, or interaction states
   - `docs/copy_guide.md` — when new screens or states need UI copy definitions
   - `docs/design_philosophy.md` — **read-only reference**. If the new feature conflicts with the existing design philosophy (e.g., gamification in a minimalist product), FLAG this as a warning and suggest running `/uiux` to revisit the design direction. Do NOT modify this file.

6) **Estimate issue count**:
   - If the description maps to a single task (one module, one screen, one endpoint) → **single-issue mode**
   - If the description spans multiple modules, screens, or endpoints → **batch mode**
   - Batch mode heuristics: count distinct screens, API endpoints, data entities, and infrastructure tasks mentioned. Each maps roughly to 1 issue.

7) Present the analysis to the user:
   - **Single-issue mode**: Assigned issue number (e.g., ISSUE-NNN), list of docs to update with rationale for each
   - **Batch mode**: Estimated issue count (3–8 range), scope summary, list of docs to update with rationale for each, message: "This feature spans multiple areas and will be decomposed into ~N issues. Proceed?"
   - If design philosophy conflict was detected: include warning and `/uiux` suggestion
   - Wait for user confirmation before proceeding. User may: approve, modify scope, switch to single-issue mode, skip design doc updates, or abort.

### Phase 3 — Issue Creation & Doc Updates

**Single-issue mode:**

7a) Invoke the `issue-writer` agent via a single Task tool call. Include the following in the prompt:
   - The natural-language description
   - The assigned issue number
   - The list of docs to update (with rationale for each) — including design docs if applicable
   - Full content of `issues.md` (for existing issue context)
   - Full content of each planning doc marked for update
   - Full content of each design doc marked for update (if `has_design_docs` and user approved)
   - Full content of `docs/prd_digest.md` (for PRD-Ref mapping)
   - Instruction: use `flock_edit.sh` for `issues.md` and `STATUS.md`

**Batch mode:**

7b) Invoke the `planner` agent in **append mode** via a single Task tool call. Include the following in the prompt:
   - Explicit instruction: "You are operating in APPEND MODE. Read the Append Mode section of your guidelines."
   - The natural-language feature description
   - The confirmed scope (which docs to update, estimated issue count)
   - Starting issue number (max existing + 1)
   - Starting FR/NFR numbers (max existing + 1, parsed from `docs/requirements.md`)
   - Full content of `issues.md` (for existing issue context and dependency awareness)
   - Full content of each planning doc marked for update
   - Full content of each design doc marked for update (if `has_design_docs` and user approved)
   - Full content of `docs/prd_digest.md` (for PRD-Ref mapping)
   - Instruction: use `flock_edit.sh` for `issues.md` and `STATUS.md`
   - Instruction: create 3–8 issues sized 0.5d–1.5d, with dependencies, following the standard issue template
   - Instruction: update all specified docs incrementally (append-only, never modify existing entries)

### Phase 4 — Validation & Report

8) Run `python3 scripts/validate_issues.py issues.md`.
   - If violations are found: re-invoke the agent (issue-writer or planner, matching Phase 3) once with the violation list to fix them. Then re-validate.
   - If violations remain after retry: log warnings and proceed.

9) **Cross-document validation** (when design docs were updated):
   - New wireframe screens (`### Screen:` in `wireframes.md`) have matching entries in `docs/ux_spec.md`
   - New components referenced in wireframes are defined in `docs/design_system.md`
   - New screens in wireframes have copy entries in `docs/copy_guide.md`
   - New issues' PRD-Ref fields reference valid FR/NFR entries in `docs/requirements.md`
   - Log any mismatches as warnings — they do NOT block the pipeline.

10) Report to the user:

   **Single-issue mode:**
   - Issue number and title
   - List of updated docs (including design docs if applicable)
   - Validation result (pass/warnings)
   - Suggest next step: `/implement ISSUE-NNN`

   **Batch mode:**
   - List of created issues (number, title, estimate, depends-on)
   - Total estimated effort (sum of estimates)
   - List of updated docs (including design docs if applicable)
   - Cross-validation results (pass/warnings)
   - Suggest next steps:
     - `/implement ISSUE-NNN` to start with the first issue
     - `/sprint` to auto-implement all new issues
     - `/uiux` if design philosophy warning was raised or prototype needs updating

## Error Handling

- `$ARGUMENTS` is empty → ask the user for a description, stop.
- `issues.md` does not exist → instruct user to run `/kickoff` first, stop.
- All planning docs missing → update only `issues.md` + `STATUS.md`, warn the user.
- Design docs missing (`has_design_docs` is false) → skip design doc updates silently, process planning docs only.
- Design philosophy conflict detected → warn user, suggest `/uiux`, continue if user approves.
- issue-writer agent fails (single-issue mode) → retry once. If it fails again, report the error and stop.
- planner agent fails (batch mode) → retry once. If it fails again, report the error and stop.

## Rollback

- This skill is additive (appends to existing files). If partially completed, the user can manually remove the last issue block from `issues.md` and revert doc changes via git.

## Shared Registry Files
**IMPORTANT**: Never commit `issues.md`, `STATUS.md`, or `CHANGELOG.md` to the feature branch.
These are registry files managed only on main. Always use `$ROOT/` path with `flock_edit.sh`.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md9 KB
  • SKILL.md.tmpl8 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.