Design a single AI-powered feature end-to-end — model selection, prompt
Scanned 5/28/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add peterbamuhigire/skills-web-dev --skill ai-feature-spec --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ai Feature Spec?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/peterbamuhigire-ai-feature-spec)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ai-feature-spec
description: Design a single AI-powered feature end-to-end — model selection, prompt
engineering, context window, output schema, fallback behaviour, human oversight,
and UX integration. Invoke for each opportunity identified in ai-opportunity-canvas.
metadata:
portable: true
compatible_with:
- Codex
- codex
---
# AI Feature Specification
Acknowledgement: Shared by Peter Bamuhigire, techguypeter.com, +256 784 464178.
<!-- dual-compat-start -->
## Use When
- Design a single AI-powered feature end-to-end — model selection, prompt engineering, context window, output schema, fallback behaviour, human oversight, and UX integration. Invoke for each opportunity identified in ai-opportunity-canvas.
- The task needs reusable judgment, domain constraints, or a proven workflow rather than ad hoc advice.
## Do Not Use When
- The task is unrelated to `ai-feature-spec` or would be better handled by a more specific companion skill.
- The request only needs a trivial answer and none of this skill's constraints or references materially help.
## Required Inputs
- Gather relevant project context, constraints, and the concrete problem to solve.
- Confirm the desired deliverable: design, code, review, migration plan, audit, or documentation.
## Workflow
- Read this `SKILL.md` first, then load only the referenced deep-dive files that are necessary for the task.
- Apply the ordered guidance, checklists, and decision rules in this skill instead of cherry-picking isolated snippets.
- Produce the deliverable with assumptions, risks, and follow-up work made explicit when they matter.
## Quality Standards
- Keep outputs execution-oriented, concise, and aligned with the repository's baseline engineering standards.
- Preserve compatibility with existing project conventions unless the skill explicitly requires a stronger standard.
- Prefer deterministic, reviewable steps over vague advice or tool-specific magic.
## Anti-Patterns
- Treating examples as copy-paste truth without checking fit, constraints, or failure modes.
- Loading every reference file by default instead of using progressive disclosure.
## Outputs
- A concrete result that fits the task: implementation guidance, review findings, architecture decisions, templates, or generated artifacts.
- Clear assumptions, tradeoffs, or unresolved gaps when the task cannot be completed from available context alone.
- References used, companion skills, or follow-up actions when they materially improve execution.
## Evidence Produced
| Category | Artifact | Format | Example |
|----------|----------|--------|---------|
| Release evidence | AI feature spec | Markdown doc covering model, prompt, output schema, fallback, and unit-economics decisions | `docs/ai/feature-spec-assistant.md` |
| Correctness | AI feature evaluation report | Markdown doc covering pre-release evaluation against acceptance criteria | `docs/ai/feature-eval-assistant.md` |
## References
- Use the links and companion skills already referenced in this file when deeper context is needed.
<!-- dual-compat-end -->
## Purpose
Produce a complete, implementation-ready blueprint for one AI-powered feature. This is the specification artifact that drives both development and the AI Integration Section of the SRS/HLD.
**Invoke this skill:** Once per AI opportunity, after `ai-opportunity-canvas` has ranked it.
---
## Feature Blueprint Template
```
## AI Feature Blueprint: [Feature Name]
**Feature ID:** AI-[NNN]
**Module:** [Parent module]
**Pattern:** [From the 10 patterns in ai-opportunity-canvas]
**AI Module Tier:** Starter / Growth / Enterprise
**Status:** Draft / Approved
### 1. Business Goal
[One sentence: what user problem this solves and the measurable outcome]
### 2. Trigger
[What event or user action initiates the AI call]
- User-initiated: [button click / form submit / page load]
- System-initiated: [scheduled job / data change event]
### 3. Model Selection
[Selected model and rationale — see Model Selection Guide below]
### 4. Input Context
[Exactly what data is assembled and sent to the model]
- System prompt: [purpose and persona]
- Data injected: [table names, field names, row limits]
- Max input tokens: [number]
### 5. Output Schema
[Exact structure the model must return]
- Format: JSON / Markdown / Plain text
- Schema: [field names, types, constraints]
- Validation: [how output is checked before showing to user]
### 6. Prompt Design
[The system prompt text — production-ready]
### 7. Fallback Behaviour
[What the system does if the AI call fails, times out, or returns invalid output]
### 8. Human Oversight
[When a human must review before action is taken]
### 9. Token Estimate
[Input tokens per call, output tokens per call — feeds ai-cost-modeling]
### 10. UX Integration
[Where result appears, loading state, streaming vs batch, feedback mechanism]
```
---
## Model Selection Guide
Choose the cheapest model that reliably handles the task.
| Task Complexity | Recommended Model | Fallback |
|----------------|-------------------|---------|
| Summarisation, classification, short extraction | Codex Haiku 4.5 / Gemini 2.0 Flash / GPT-4o mini | DeepSeek V3 |
| Multi-step reasoning, structured JSON output, analysis | Codex Sonnet 4.6 / GPT-4o | Codex Haiku 4.5 |
| Complex document analysis, long context (> 50K tokens) | Codex Sonnet 4.6 (200K context) | Gemini 1.5 Pro |
| Image / document OCR + extraction | Codex Sonnet 4.6 / GPT-4o Vision | Gemini 2.0 Flash |
| Cost-critical, high volume (> 1,000 calls/day) | DeepSeek V3 / Gemini 2.0 Flash | GPT-4o mini |
**Rule:** Always start with the cheapest adequate model. Upgrade only when output quality is demonstrably insufficient.
**Provider abstraction:** Always code against a provider-agnostic interface so the model can be swapped without rewriting feature logic. See `ai-architecture-patterns`.
---
## Prompt Engineering Standards
### System Prompt Structure
```
You are [role] for [system name].
Your task: [one precise sentence].
Output format: [JSON schema / markdown structure / plain text].
Constraints:
- [constraint 1]
- [constraint 2]
Language: [English / Luganda / Swahili — match user locale]
```
### Rules
1. **Role-first** — Open with a clear role statement. It anchors model behaviour.
2. **One task per prompt** — Do not ask the model to summarise AND classify in one call.
3. **Explicit output format** — Always specify format. For JSON, embed the schema in the prompt.
4. **Inject only relevant data** — Do not send entire tables. Pre-filter in SQL before sending.
5. **Set a token budget** — Tell the model its output limit: "Reply in under 200 words."
6. **Language instruction** — Specify the output language explicitly for African deployments.
7. **No PII in prompt unless necessary** — See `ai-security` for PII scrubbing rules.
### Few-Shot Pattern (for classification tasks)
```
Examples:
Input: "Paid via MoMo on 15 March" → Category: "Mobile Money Payment"
Input: "Returned goods, credit note issued" → Category: "Credit Note"
Input: [user_input] → Category:
```
---
## Output Schema Design
For structured outputs, always use JSON with a validation step before displaying to users.
**Example — Predictive Alert:**
```json
{
"alert_level": "high|medium|low",
"summary": "string (max 100 chars)",
"reason": "string (max 300 chars)",
"recommended_action": "string (max 200 chars)",
"confidence": "high|medium|low",
"data_points_used": ["string"]
}
```
**Validation rule:** If the model returns an unparseable response or a field fails its constraint, log the failure, return the fallback, and flag for review. Never display raw model output directly.
---
## Fallback Behaviour Patterns
| Failure Mode | Fallback Action |
|--------------|----------------|
| API timeout (> 10s) | Show cached last result with timestamp; offer retry |
| Invalid JSON output | Log error, show "Analysis unavailable — try again" |
| Budget exceeded (gate blocked) | Show "AI module limit reached — contact admin" |
| Model returns refusal | Show neutral placeholder; do not expose model refusal text to end user |
| API provider outage | Queue the request, process when restored; notify user |
---
## Human Oversight Patterns
Apply oversight based on action severity:
| Decision Type | Oversight Level |
|--------------|----------------|
| Display only (summary, report) | None — show directly |
| Suggestion (recommend reorder) | Soft — user can accept/dismiss |
| Action with cost (send alert, flag account) | Hard — require explicit confirm |
| Irreversible action (delete, blacklist, approve loan) | Mandatory human approval gate |
---
## Token Estimation Worksheet
```
Input tokens = system_prompt_tokens
+ injected_data_tokens
+ user_query_tokens
Output tokens = expected_response_tokens
Total per call = input + output
Calls per user per day = [estimate from use case]
Monthly tokens per user = total_per_call × calls/day × 30
```
Feed these numbers into `ai-cost-modeling` for cost and pricing calculations.
---
## Anti-Patterns
- Never send more data than the model needs — pre-filter in the application layer.
- Never display raw model output without validation and sanitisation.
- Never make irreversible actions AI-initiated without a human confirmation step.
- Never hardcode a specific model — use a configurable provider abstraction.
- Never skip the fallback — AI APIs have non-trivial failure rates.
---
**See also:**
- `ai-opportunity-canvas` — Source of AI features to spec
- `ai-cost-modeling` — Token cost and pricing from estimates here
- `ai-architecture-patterns` — Provider abstraction and gate implementation
- `ai-security` — PII rules and output sanitisation
- `ai-ux-patterns` — UX for loading, streaming, feedbackIs this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!