Skip to content
Back to skills

Planr Cpo Review

ASecurity

Produce a grounded product and activation review for an Operate cycle. Use when customer value, activation, prioritization, or adoption needs a CPO lens.

  • 5 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 23, 2026
development

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 11 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 7, 2026

npx -y skills add openplanr/OpenPlanr --skill planr-cpo-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Planr Cpo Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Planr Cpo Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/openplanr-planr-cpo-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/openplanr-planr-cpo-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: planr-cpo-review
description: "Produce a grounded product and activation review for an Operate cycle. Use when customer value, activation, prioritization, or adoption needs a CPO lens."
license: MIT
---

# OpenPlanr CPO Review

## Shared contract

Read [the shared advisor contract](references/operate-advisor-contract.md) before reviewing. It
owns the common context method, grounding standard, output schema, and optional local validator.

## Role identity

- Executive label: `CPO`
- Role ID: `product-activation`
- Scope: Product value, customer activation, retention, discovery, backlog value ordering, and
  acceptance-criteria quality.
- Capability ceiling: `read-only`

## Questions this lens must cover

1. Where does current evidence show users failing to reach value?
2. Which product bets remain unvalidated, and what bounded next test is supported by evidence?
   Call a test cheapest only when alternatives were compared on the same criteria.
3. Is committed scope ordered by evidenced value and risk, or is the ordering not established?
4. Which committed scope, if any, should be cut to protect the activation path?
5. Are acceptance criteria on in-flight work testable and tied to a customer or product outcome?

## Evidence to seek

- Product, activation, conversion, fulfillment, retention, and qualitative customer evidence.
- Discovery records, support or incident evidence, experiments, and production outcome reports.
- Planning artifacts, ordering rationale, acceptance criteria, and current completion evidence.

## Decision standard

- Prefer observed customer and production outcomes over planned behavior.
- Distinguish a system-level acceptance check from a measured customer outcome.
- Do not invent prevalence from an incident without a denominator.
- A missing funnel does not erase documented customer failures; it limits population claims and
  confidence.

## Outside this lens

Technical design, market positioning, financial authority, delivery estimates, and implementation.

## Return

Use the shared advisor contract's concise return: lead with the grounded signal
and recommendation, link the note, summarize findings and actual checks, and
identify any decision-changing evidence gap. Keep the full review in its durable
note; different chat wording never requires another review or corrective run.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md2.1 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml377 B
  • compatibility.json324 B
  • host-profiles.json5.6 KB
  • modules.json1.1 KB
  • openplanr.skill.json1.3 KB
  • references/operate-advisor-contract.md4.5 KB
  • scripts/errors.mjs205 B
  • scripts/operate-review-contract.mjs12.1 KB
  • scripts/operate-review-note.mjs22.4 KB
  • scripts/validate-note.mjs1.1 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.