Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Measure Experiment Design

ASecurity

Designs an A/B test or experiment with variants, success metrics, sample size, and duration for an existing hypothesis. Use when planning an experiment to validate a product change or test an assumption you have already framed. To articulate the hypothesis itself first, use define-hypothesis.

36 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/22/2026
researchgotestinggit

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/22/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add NVlabs/Skill2Env --skill measure-experiment-design --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Measure Experiment Design?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Measure Experiment Design
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/nvlabs-measure-experiment-design/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nvlabs-measure-experiment-design)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: measure-experiment-design
description: Designs an A/B test or experiment with variants, success metrics, sample size, and duration for an existing hypothesis. Use when planning an experiment to validate a product change or test an assumption you have already framed. To articulate the hypothesis itself first, use define-hypothesis.
license: Apache-2.0
metadata:
  phase: measure
  version: "2.1.0"
  updated: 2026-06-10
  category: validation
  frameworks: [triple-diamond, lean-startup, design-thinking]
  author: product-on-purpose
---
<!-- PM-Skills | https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills | Apache 2.0 -->
# Experiment Design

An experiment design document defines all parameters needed to run a rigorous A/B test or controlled experiment. It ensures the team aligns on what you're testing, how you'll measure success, and how long to run the test before drawing conclusions. Good experiment design prevents common pitfalls: underpowered tests, unclear success criteria, and decisions based on noise rather than signal.

## When to Use

- Before launching an A/B test to validate a product change
- When testing a hypothesis that requires quantitative validation
- After solution design to validate assumptions before full rollout
- When stakeholders want data-driven evidence for a decision
- To establish a culture of experimentation and learning

## When NOT to Use

- The hypothesis itself is not yet articulated -> use `define-hypothesis` first; this skill designs the test for a claim you already have
- You are analyzing a completed experiment -> use `measure-experiment-results`
- You need the event tracking that will measure the experiment -> use `measure-instrumentation-spec`
- You are gathering opinions rather than running a controlled test -> use `measure-survey-analysis`

## Instructions

When asked to design an experiment, follow these steps:

1. **Articulate the Hypothesis**
   Write a clear, testable hypothesis in the format: "We believe [change] for [users] will [outcome] as measured by [metric]." One hypothesis per experiment - if you're testing multiple things, run multiple experiments.

2. **Define the Variants**
   Describe the control (current experience) and treatment (new experience) in sufficient detail. Include screenshots, mockups, or precise descriptions so anyone can understand what users will see.

3. **Choose Primary and Secondary Metrics**
   Select one primary metric that will determine success or failure. Add 2-3 secondary metrics to understand the broader impact. Include guardrail metrics to catch unintended negative effects.

4. **Calculate Sample Size**
   Determine how many users you need per variant to detect your minimum detectable effect (MDE) with statistical significance. Specify your significance level (typically 0.05) and power (typically 0.80).

5. **Estimate Duration**
   Based on sample size and available traffic, calculate how long the experiment needs to run. Account for weekly patterns - avoid ending mid-week if behavior varies by day.

6. **Define Targeting and Allocation**
   Specify which users are eligible for the experiment and how traffic is split between variants. Document any exclusions (e.g., employees, specific segments).

7. **Set Success Criteria**
   Define upfront what constitutes a win, a loss, or an inconclusive result. This prevents post-hoc rationalization and moving goalposts.

8. **Document Risks and Mitigations**
   Identify what could go wrong and how you'll detect/address it. Include monitoring plans and rollback criteria.

## Output Format

Use the template in `references/TEMPLATE.md` to structure the output. A complete design fills every template section: Overview; Hypothesis; Background; Variants; Metrics; Sample Size & Duration; Audience Targeting; Success Criteria; Risks & Mitigations; Implementation Notes; and References.

## Quality Checklist

Before finalizing, verify:

- [ ] Hypothesis is falsifiable and specific
- [ ] Only one primary metric is defined
- [ ] Sample size calculation is documented with assumptions
- [ ] Duration accounts for traffic patterns and statistical requirements
- [ ] Success criteria are defined before the experiment starts
- [ ] Guardrail metrics protect against unintended harm

## Examples

See `references/EXAMPLE.md` for a completed example.

Attribution

NVlabsNVlabs
View sourceMore from NVlabs →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report co...

492472 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

813271 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end p...

492471 votes

Exa Search

Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API

304951 votes
View all in research →