Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Alterlab Tubitak Proposal

ASecurity

Scaffolds TÜBİTAK ARDEB national research proposals (1001 Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Projeleri and 1002-A Hızlı Destek Modülü) against the official .doc form trees: 1. ÖZGÜN DEĞER (konunun önemi/özgün değer, araştırma sorusu/hipotezi, amaç ve hedefler), 2. YÖNTEM, 3. PROJE YÖNETİMİ (iş-zaman çizelgesi/iş paketleri + B-Planı, araştırma olanakları), 4. YAYGIN ETKİ, EK-1 Kaynaklar, EK-2 Bütçe ve Gerekçesi. Enforces the 600-word TR/EN özet (abstract) caps, program caps (1001 <=36 months/3,0...

158 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 10/6/2026
researchpythongobashapi

Works with

api

Security Analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 7 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned 10/6/2026

$npx -y skills add NVlabs/Skill2Env --skill alterlab-tubitak-proposal --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Alterlab Tubitak Proposal?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Alterlab Tubitak Proposal
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/nvlabs-alterlab-tubitak-proposal/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nvlabs-alterlab-tubitak-proposal)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: alterlab-tubitak-proposal
description: "Scaffolds TÜBİTAK ARDEB national research proposals (1001 Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Projeleri and 1002-A Hızlı Destek Modülü) against the official .doc form trees: 1. ÖZGÜN DEĞER (konunun önemi/özgün değer, araştırma sorusu/hipotezi, amaç ve hedefler), 2. YÖNTEM, 3. PROJE YÖNETİMİ (iş-zaman çizelgesi/iş paketleri + B-Planı, araştırma olanakları), 4. YAYGIN ETKİ, EK-1 Kaynaklar, EK-2 Bütçe ve Gerekçesi. Enforces the 600-word TR/EN özet (abstract) caps, program caps (1001 <=36 months/3,000,000 TRY for 2026-1; 1002-A <=12 months/150,000 TRY, rolling), and the four panel review dimensions; submission via PBS (ardeb-pbs.tubitak.gov.tr) with ARBİS prerequisite. Delegates generic grant craft to alterlab-research-grants. Use when the user wants to write a TÜBİTAK 1001 or 1002-A proposal, draft özgün değer or yaygın etki sections, scaffold a Turkish national grant, or map broader-impacts framing to TÜBİTAK terms. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite."
license: MIT
allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash(python:*) WebFetch
compatibility: No API key required — generates proposal scaffolds offline; the structure checker runs via `uv run python` on stdlib only. Program caps/forms change each call period; WebFetch the live PBS/guide pages to confirm before submission.
metadata:
  skill-author: AlterLab
  version: "1.0.0"
  last_updated: "2026-06-06"
  depends_on: "alterlab-research-grants (generic grant-craft this skill delegates to)"
---

# TÜBİTAK ARDEB Proposal Scaffolder — 1001 & 1002-A

Scaffolds a TÜBİTAK ARDEB (Araştırma Destek Programları Başkanlığı — the Research
Support Programmes directorate) proposal against the **verified official form tree**,
in the directorate's own Turkish section order, then maps the researcher's content into
each heading and checks the hard caps the panel rejects on. It owns the **Turkish-specific
form structure, terminology, and program rules** only — generic grant-craft (broader-impacts
argumentation, feasibility narrative, Gantt aesthetics) is delegated to
`alterlab-research-grants`.

Two variants:

- **1001** — *Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Projelerini Destekleme Programı* (Support
  Programme for Scientific and Technological Research Projects). The heavy, full-form program.
- **1002-A** — *Hızlı Destek Modülü* (Fast Support Module). The light, short-form, low-budget,
  rolling-application variant.

## Quick Start

```
Write me a TÜBİTAK 1001 proposal outline for <topic>
Draft the özgün değer (original value) section for my ARDEB 1001
Scaffold a 1002-A Hızlı Destek başvurusu
Turn my NSF broader-impacts paragraph into a TÜBİTAK yaygın etki section
```

→ Pick the variant, generate the section tree (`scripts/scaffold_proposal.py`), draft each
heading from the user's material, then run the cap/structure check
(`scripts/scaffold_proposal.py --check`) before reporting. Always print the
**verify-current-call** disclaimer — caps and forms change every application period.

## When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when the request is to **author, outline, or section-map a TÜBİTAK ARDEB
1001 or 1002-A proposal**, draft a specific Turkish section (özgün değer = original value;
yaygın etki = broader impact/dissemination; yöntem = method; iş paketi = work package), or
translate international broader-impacts framing into TÜBİTAK terminology.

### Does NOT Trigger

The route below sends adjacent requests to the correct sibling skill in the suite. This skill
does **not** check journal indexing, compute career points, or write a non-Turkish grant.

| The request is really about… | Route to |
|------------------------------|----------|
| Generic grant-craft / NSF / NIH / ERC narrative, broader-impacts argumentation in the abstract | `alterlab-research-grants` |
| Interim/final progress report (gelişme/sonuç raporu) for an **awarded** TÜBİTAK project | `alterlab-grant-reporting` |
| Is a target journal in **TR Dizin** (national index)? | `alterlab-trdizin` |
| Does a candidate clear **doçentlik** (associate-professor) point thresholds? | `alterlab-docentlik-eligibility` |
| Computing the **akademik teşvik** (academic-incentive) net score | `alterlab-akademik-tesvik` |
| The **etik kurul** (ethics-committee) application / informed-consent form | `alterlab-tr-research-ethics` |
| The KVKK-compliant data-management plan / TÜBİTAK Veri Yönetim Planı | `alterlab-kvkk-dmp` |
| Depositing the accepted manuscript on **Aperta** under the Open Science Policy | `alterlab-aperta` |
| Turkish APA-7 / TR Dizin manuscript style for the paper itself | `alterlab-tr-academic-style` |
| Searching DergiPark / YÖK theses for the literature review | `alterlab-dergipark`, `alterlab-yok-tez` |

---

## The Verified Form Tree

Both forms share the same backbone; 1002-A is the trimmed variant. Section names below are the
directorate's own headings (see `references/form_structure.md` for the full annotated tree and
the per-section drafting briefs).

| # | Section (TR) | English gloss | 1001 | 1002-A |
|---|--------------|---------------|------|--------|
| Özet | ÖZET (TR) + ABSTRACT (EN) | Abstract as **two separate blocks** (TR + EN), each with Anahtar Kelimeler / Keywords | ✅ | ✅ |
| 1 | **ÖZGÜN DEĞER** | Original value / significance | ✅ | ✅ |
| 1.1 | Konunun Önemi ve Özgün Değer | Importance & original value of the topic | ✅ | ✅ |
| 1.2 | Araştırma Sorusu / Hipotezi | Research question / hypothesis | ✅ | ✅ |
| 1.3 | Amaç ve Hedefler | Aim & objectives | ✅ | ✅ |
| 2 | **YÖNTEM** | Method | ✅ | ✅ |
| 3 | **PROJE YÖNETİMİ** | Project management | ✅ | (light) |
| 3.1 | İş-Zaman Çizelgesi ve İş Paketleri (+ **B-Planı**) | Work–time chart & work packages (+ contingency plan) | ✅ | ✅ |
| 3.2 | Araştırma Olanakları | Research facilities/resources | ✅ | ✅ |
| 4 | **YAYGIN ETKİ** | Broader impact / dissemination | ✅ | (light) |
| 4.1 | Öngörülen Çıktılar | Expected outputs | ✅ | ✅ |
| 4.2 | Öngörülen Etkiler / Bilim İletişimi | Expected impacts / science communication | ✅ | ✅ |
| EK-1 | Kaynaklar | References (cited literature) | ✅ | ✅ |
| EK-2 | Bütçe ve Gerekçesi | Budget & its justification | ✅ | ✅ |
| EK-3 | Diğer Projeler / TÜBİTAK Destekleri | Other projects & prior TÜBİTAK support | ✅ | (if applicable) |

**Map, don't invent.** The directorate evaluates against *these* headings; never silently
restructure them into an IMRaD paper. The özgün değer section is the single most weighted part
of a 1001 — it is where the panel decides novelty.

---

## The Hard Caps (panel rejects on these)

These are **administrative-eligibility** filters: a proposal that violates them can be returned
without scientific review. Pin them with `scripts/scaffold_proposal.py --check`; see
`references/program_profiles.md` for the full table with as-of dates.

| Item | 1001 | 1002-A |
|------|------|--------|
| Özet word cap (TR & EN each) | **600 words** | **600 words** |
| Project duration | **≤ 36 months** | **≤ 12 months** |
| Budget upper limit (PTİ/burs hariç) | **3,000,000 TRY** (2026-1 period) | **150,000 TRY/yr** (incl. burs, as of 2026-02-01) |
| Application window | Periodic call (çağrı) | **Rolling / year-round (sürekli)** |
| Form length | per current rehber (guide) | **≤ 12 pages** excl. annexes |
| PI (Yürütücü) requirement | Doctorate + eligible affiliation | per current rehber |

> **Verify-current-call disclaimer (always print).** Every TRY figure, page limit, and
> duration above is dated and *changes each application period*. Before the user submits,
> WebFetch the live program page and the current başvuru rehberi (application guide) listed in
> `references/program_profiles.md` and reconcile. Caps observed for the 2026-1 (1001) and
> 2026-02-01 (1002-A) periods; TÜBİTAK has announced major 1002 program changes, so treat
> 1002-A caps as especially volatile.

---

## The Four Review Dimensions

ARDEB panels score against four axes. Draft each section *to* its axis; the mapping below is
the lens the panelist (hakem) uses. Full criteria in `references/review_criteria.md`.

| Dimension (TR) | English | Carried mainly by |
|----------------|---------|-------------------|
| **Bilimsel/Teknolojik Nitelik ve Özgün Değer** | Scientific quality & original value | Özet, §1 ÖZGÜN DEĞER, EK-1 |
| **Yöntem** | Method & feasibility (yapılabilirlik) | §2 YÖNTEM |
| **Proje Yönetimi ve Araştırma Olanakları** | Project management & resources | §3 (iş paketleri, B-Planı, §3.2) |
| **Yaygın Etki** | Broader impact & dissemination | §4 YAYGIN ETKİ, EK-2 |

---

## Terminology Bridge (international ↔ TÜBİTAK)

When the user arrives with NSF/NIH/ERC material, translate the *concept*, not word-for-word.
Full glossary in `references/terminology_bridge.md`.

| International term | TÜBİTAK term | Note |
|-------------------|--------------|------|
| Significance / innovation / intellectual merit | **Özgün değer** | The most weighted axis; lead with what is genuinely new |
| Broader impacts | **Yaygın etki** | Split into çıktılar (outputs), etkiler (impacts), bilim iletişimi (sci-comm) |
| Feasibility | **Yapılabilirlik** | Lives inside §2 YÖNTEM + §3 management |
| Contingency / risk plan | **B-Planı** | A *required* sub-element of the work-package section, not optional |
| Work package / Gantt | **İş paketi / İş-Zaman Çizelgesi** | Gantt aesthetics → delegate to `alterlab-research-grants` |
| Aims & objectives | **Amaç ve Hedefler** | Hedefler should be measurable, tied to work packages |

---

## Pipeline (how to run it)

### 1. Choose the variant and generate the scaffold

```bash
uv run python skills/turkish-academia/alterlab-tubitak-proposal/scripts/scaffold_proposal.py \
    --program 1001 \
    --title "<project title>" \
    --out proposal_scaffold.md
```

`--program` accepts `1001` or `1002a`. The script emits the full Markdown section tree with the
TR heading, its English gloss, the panel dimension each section serves, and a short drafting
brief per heading. Use `--lang tr` (default) or `--lang both` for bilingual headings.

### 2. Draft each section from the user's material

Fill the scaffold from what the user provides. Keep the directorate's ordering. For özgün değer,
state the *gap* and the *new contribution* explicitly. For yaygın etki, populate all three
sub-parts (çıktılar / etkiler / bilim iletişimi). Pull literature into EK-1 Kaynaklar — and have
`alterlab-citation-verifier` existence-check the bibliography before submission.

### 3. Check the caps and structure

```bash
uv run python skills/turkish-academia/alterlab-tubitak-proposal/scripts/scaffold_proposal.py \
    --check proposal_scaffold.md --program 1001
```

The checker reports: missing required sections, TR/EN özet word counts vs the 600-word cap,
whether duration/budget statements (if present) exceed the program ceilings, and whether a
B-Planı sub-section exists. It is **advisory** — it never edits the proposal and it always
restates the verify-current-call disclaimer because the ceilings are period-specific.

### 4. Hand off and disclaim

- Budget detail / VYP-style data plan → name the sibling (`alterlab-kvkk-dmp`,
  `alterlab-aperta`); do not draft compliance text here.
- Always tell the user to confirm the live caps in the current rehberi before submission.

---

## Submission Surface (read-only facts)

- **PBS** — Proje Başvuru Sistemi at `ardeb-pbs.tubitak.gov.tr`. Proposals are entered and
  submitted here.
- **ARBİS** — Araştırmacı Bilgi Sistemi at `arbis.tubitak.gov.tr`. A current ARBİS record is a
  prerequisite; the PI/personnel CVs flow from it. Tell the user to refresh ARBİS *before*
  starting the PBS entry.

This skill does **not** automate or log into either system — it produces the document content
the researcher pastes/uploads.

---

## Self-Check Before Reporting

- Did you use the **directorate's section order and Turkish headings**, not an IMRaD remap?
- Is the **özet within 600 words in BOTH** Turkish and English?
- Did you state duration/budget **only with the verify-current-call disclaimer**, never as a
  guaranteed cap?
- Does §3 contain a **B-Planı**, and §4 all three yaygın-etki sub-parts?
- Did you **route** budget-compliance, ethics, indexing, and reporting asks to the correct
  siblings rather than answering them here?

---

## References

- `references/form_structure.md` — the full annotated 1001 & 1002-A section tree with a drafting
  brief per heading and the 1001-vs-1002-A delta.
- `references/program_profiles.md` — per-program caps (duration, budget, window, form length)
  with as-of dates and the live verification URLs.
- `references/review_criteria.md` — the four panel dimensions and how each section is scored.
- `references/terminology_bridge.md` — international ↔ TÜBİTAK concept glossary.

Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Attribution

NVlabsNVlabs
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from NVlabs →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report co...

502942 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

953191 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end p...

502941 votes

Literature Review

Assistance with writing literature reviews by searching for academic sources via Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref and PubMed APIs. Use when the user needs to find papers on a topic, get details for specific DOIs, or draft sections of a literature review with proper citations.

6511 votes
View all in research →