Skip to content
Back to skills

Check Pr Review

ASecurity

Perform an in-depth review of a pull request branch, comparing it to the base branch and pointing out issues.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 4 views
  • Added September 8, 2026
code-qualitybashsqlgitsecurityperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 8, 2026

npx -y skills add nobodyonlyc/skills --skill check-pr-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Check Pr Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Check Pr Review
[![Security: A β€” Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/nobodyonlyc-check-pr-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nobodyonlyc-check-pr-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: check-pr-review
description: Perform an in-depth review of a pull request branch, comparing it to the base branch and pointing out issues.
---

> **[Orchestrator Instructions]** Do NOT execute this skill yourself. You MUST use the invoke_subagent tool to spawn an independent subagent with the Role: **Tech Lead**.


Gather the PR diff to review. If $ARGUMENTS is a PR number, fetch it; otherwise review the current branch:

```bash
# If PR number provided, fetch it; otherwise use local diff
PR="${ARGUMENTS:-}"
if [ -n "$PR" ]; then
  gh pr diff "$PR"
  gh pr view "$PR" --json title,body,author,additions,deletions,changedFiles
else
  git diff main..HEAD 2>/dev/null || git diff master..HEAD
  git log main..HEAD --oneline 2>/dev/null || git log master..HEAD --oneline
fi
```

Review the diff thoroughly and write a structured report to `.harness/reports/pr-review.md`. Your chat response must ONLY be the path to this file (e.g. "Review complete. See .harness/reports/pr-review.md"). Do NOT output the report text in the chat.

## Correctness
- List logic bugs, off-by-one errors, null/undefined risks, race conditions
- Flag any data loss or destructive operations without guards

## Security
- SQL injection, XSS, command injection, hardcoded secrets
- Missing auth/authorization checks, insecure defaults

## Code Quality
- Dead code, duplicated logic, missing error handling
- Naming issues, overly complex functions

## Suggestions
- Quick wins for simplification or performance
- Patterns that could be extracted/reused

For each finding: file + line reference, severity (πŸ”΄ critical / 🟑 warning / πŸ”΅ suggestion), and a one-line fix hint.

End with: **Overall verdict** β€” Approve / Request changes / Needs discussion.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

View all in code-quality β†’

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.