Skip to content
Back to skills

Nightgauge Integration Audit

BSecurity

Cross-repository integration audit. Validates that client API calls match

  • 8 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added November 5, 2026
developmentgobashangularnodedockergitapidocumentation

Works with

  • vscode
  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

B88/100
  • criticalExfiltrates credentials via HTTP — exact pattern from Snyk ToxicSkills study

Pro shows the line behind each finding and how to fix it

Scanned November 5, 2026

npx -y skills add nightgauge/nightgauge --skill nightgauge-integration-audit --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Nightgauge Integration Audit?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Nightgauge Integration Audit
[![Security: B — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/nightgauge-nightgauge-integration-audit/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nightgauge-nightgauge-integration-audit)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: nightgauge-integration-audit
description: Cross-repository integration audit. Validates that client API calls match
  platform endpoints, auth flows are aligned, docs are current, and cross-repo
  dependencies are tracked. Run before major epic creation or after platform
  changes.
license: Apache-2.0
metadata:
  author: nightgauge
  version: "1.2.0"
  source: https://github.com/nightgauge/nightgauge
allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Glob Grep Bash Task Agent AskUserQuestion
orchestration:
  mode: fanout
  phase: client-extraction
  ceiling: fanout
  units:
    - id: dashboard
      role: client-worker
      promptRef: SKILL.md#angular-acme-dashboard
    - id: flutter
      role: client-worker
      promptRef: SKILL.md#flutter-acme-mobile
    - id: extension
      role: client-worker
      promptRef: SKILL.md#extension-nightgauge
  judge:
    mode: merge
    quorum: 1
    promptRef: SKILL.md#phase-4-gap-analysis
---

# Integration Audit

Validate cross-repository integration health across the Nightgauge product
family. This skill catches the class of problems where client apps call API
endpoints that don't exist, auth flows are mismatched, or docs have drifted from
reality.

## When to Use

- **Before creating epics** that span multiple repositories
- **After major platform changes** (new endpoints, auth changes, schema updates)
- **Periodically** (weekly or before sprint planning) to catch drift
- **When a client app reports unexpected 404/401 errors** against the platform

## Outcomes

- Structured gap report: which client API calls have no matching platform
  endpoint
- Auth flow alignment matrix across all clients
- Stale documentation inventory
- Missing cross-repo dependency links
- Actionable issue suggestions for discovered gaps

## Prerequisites

- Docker containers running (`docker ps` shows nightgauge-api healthy)
- All 4 repos cloned in the workspace (`../acme-platform`,
  `../acme-dashboard`, `../acme-mobile`)
- `gh` CLI authenticated

## Orchestration

This skill declares an `orchestration:` frontmatter block (`mode: fanout`) that
fans the Phase 3 client API-call extraction out as one worker unit per client
surface (dashboard/Angular, Flutter, extension), then a merge judge reconciles
their findings against the platform endpoint truth (Phase 4 gap analysis). The
block is consumed by the capability-routed `WorkflowEngine` (epic #3899); see
[docs/WORKFLOW_ORCHESTRATION.md](../../docs/WORKFLOW_ORCHESTRATION.md). Each
unit's `promptRef` points at the SAME extraction section the prose **Workflow**
below walks, so providers without an orchestration capability extract the three
surfaces sequentially in one agent — the prose stays the portability floor.

## Workflow

### Phase 0: Environment Preflight

<!-- include: ../_shared/PREFLIGHT.md -->

---

### Phase 1: Discover Workspace

1. Identify all repositories in the workspace:
   - `nightgauge` (VSCode extension)
   - `acme-platform` (Cloud API)
   - `acme-dashboard` (Web dashboard)
   - `acme-mobile` (Mobile app)
2. Verify each repo exists at the expected path relative to the workspace root.
3. Skip any repo not found — report it but continue with available repos.

### Phase 2: Platform API Reality Check

Probe the running platform API to determine exactly what endpoints exist.

**Preferred path — deterministic Go binary (binary-first):**

```bash
# Optional: get a test token if ENABLE_TEST_AUTH is set
TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST http://localhost:3000/v1/auth/test-token \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"githubLogin":"audit-user"}' | jq -r .token)

# Run the probe — emits a 6-category JSON ProbeReport
nightgauge integration probe-platform \
  --base-url http://localhost:3000 \
  --auth-mode jwt --token "$TOKEN" \
  --json > /tmp/integration-probe.json
```

The JSON ProbeReport (schema documented in `docs/GO_BINARY.md` →
`### Integration Operations`) is the input Phase 4 reads. Categorization is
deterministic: status code + body-shape rules below. No prose parsing needed.

**Categorization rules (the verb applies these — table is for reference):**

| HTTP status                  | Body shape                              | Category        |
| ---------------------------- | --------------------------------------- | --------------- |
| 2xx                          | non-empty, non-stub                     | `WORKING`       |
| 2xx                          | empty / `[]` / `{}` / `null` / length<4 | `STUB`          |
| 401                          | any                                     | `AUTH_REQUIRED` |
| 403                          | any                                     | `AUTH_MISMATCH` |
| 404                          | any                                     | `NOT_FOUND`     |
| 5xx                          | any                                     | `BROKEN`        |
| other (3xx, transport error) | any                                     | `BROKEN`        |

**Fallback — inline curl loop** (only if the binary is unavailable):

If `command -v nightgauge` returns nothing, fall back to probing each
endpoint manually with `curl` and recording `{method, path, status, category}`
into the same shape. The endpoint list is maintained in
`configs/integration-platform-endpoints.yaml` and embedded in the binary; if
both are unreachable, the canonical hand-curated list is:

```
AUTH:       GET /v1/auth/me, POST /v1/auth/web/github, POST /v1/auth/web/callback,
            POST /v1/auth/logout, POST /v1/auth/refresh, POST /v1/auth/signout,
            POST /v1/auth/token/refresh, POST /v1/auth/device-code,
            POST /v1/auth/device-token, POST /v1/auth/github
PIPELINES:  GET /v1/pipeline-runs, GET /v1/pipeline-runs/stats,
            GET /v1/pipeline-runs/:id, GET /v1/pipelines/commands/:id,
            GET /v1/pipelines/events/stream, GET /v1/sessions,
            POST /v1/pipelines/trigger, GET /v1/pipelines/slots
QUEUE:      GET /v1/queue, POST /v1/queue/add, DELETE /v1/queue/:id,
            POST /v1/queue/reorder
GITHUB:     GET /v1/github/issues, GET /v1/github/prs, GET /v1/github/epics,
            GET /v1/github/board/items
TEAM:       GET /v1/team/members, GET /v1/team/:id/members
ANALYTICS:  GET /v1/analytics/health, GET /v1/analytics/trends,
            GET /v1/analytics/cost, GET /v1/analytics/dashboard
ADMIN:      GET /v1/billing/subscription, GET /v1/billing/invoices,
            GET /v1/webhooks, GET /v1/api-keys, GET /v1/audit-log,
            GET /v1/events, GET /v1/users/me/notification-preferences
HEALTH:     GET /health, GET /v1/health, GET /ready, GET /v1/health/report
```

### Phase 3: Client API Call Extraction

For each client repository, extract every API call:

#### Angular (`acme-dashboard`)

```bash
# Search all service files, stores, and interceptors
grep -rn "this\.http\.\(get\|post\|put\|patch\|delete\)" src/app/ \
  --include="*.ts" | grep -oP "['\"]\K[^'\"]+(?=['\"])"
grep -rn "fetch\(" src/app/ --include="*.ts"
grep -rn "platformApiUrl" src/app/ --include="*.ts"
```

Record each call as: `{method, path, authType, file, line}`.

#### Flutter (`acme-mobile`)

```bash
# Search all API files and data sources
grep -rn "\.get\|\.post\|\.put\|\.patch\|\.delete" lib/ \
  --include="*.dart" | grep -oP "['\"]\K/[^'\"]+(?=['\"])"
```

Record each call as: `{method, path, authType, file, line}`.

#### Extension (`nightgauge`)

```bash
# Search IPC client and direct fetch calls
# EXT_SRC is the extension repository's source directory (e.g. src/).
EXT_SRC="${EXT_SRC:-src}"
grep -rn "platform\." "$EXT_SRC" \
  --include="*.ts" | grep -v "node_modules"
grep -rn "fetch\(" "$EXT_SRC" \
  --include="*.ts" | grep -v "node_modules"
```

### Phase 4: Gap Analysis

Compare client expectations against platform reality:

1. **Endpoint existence**: For each client API call, check if the platform
   endpoint exists (from Phase 2). Flag any `NOT_FOUND` or `STUB` matches.

2. **Auth method alignment**: For each client API call, verify the auth method
   matches what the platform expects:
   - Client sends JWT cookie → platform must accept cookie auth
   - Client sends Bearer token → platform must accept JWT Bearer
   - Client sends license key → platform must accept license key

3. **Path consistency**: Check for path mismatches where the client and platform
   use different paths for the same resource (e.g., `/pipelines/queue` vs
   `/queue`, `/teams/members` vs `/team/:teamId/members`).

4. **SSE endpoint alignment**: Verify each client's SSE connection URL matches
   an actual platform SSE endpoint.

5. **Response shape compatibility**: For working endpoints, verify the response
   JSON structure matches what the client expects (compare field names).

### Phase 5: Documentation Freshness

Check key documentation files for staleness:

1. **ECOSYSTEM.md** (`nightgauge/docs/ECOSYSTEM.md`):
   - Does the Development Maturity Matrix match reality?
   - Does the API Endpoint Coverage table match Phase 4 results?
   - Are auth flow diagrams accurate?

2. **ARCHITECTURE.md** (each client repo):
   - Does the Platform Integration Status section exist and is it current?
   - Does the tech stack table match actual dependencies?

3. **AGENTS.md** (each repo; `CLAUDE.md` only as its adapter):
   - Are companion repository references current?
   - Are epic references still valid (not closed/superseded)?

4. **OpenAPI spec** (`acme-platform/packages/api/openapi/`):
   - Does the spec include all implemented REST endpoints?
   - Are there spec entries for endpoints that don't exist?

### Phase 6: Cross-Repo Dependency Audit

Check that cross-repo dependencies are properly tracked:

1. **Open epics with cross-repo blockers**: For each open epic in Angular and
   Flutter, check if it has `blockedBy` relationships to platform epics when the
   sub-issues reference platform API endpoints.

2. **Orphaned platform epics**: Check if platform epics that block client work
   are actually open and progressing.

3. **Stale blocking relationships**: Check if any `blockedBy` relationships
   point to closed issues (dependency already satisfied but not unblocked).

### Phase 7: Generate Report

Produce a structured report with these sections:

```markdown
## Integration Audit Report — {date}

### Executive Summary

- X endpoints missing, Y auth mismatches, Z path inconsistencies
- N documentation files stale
- M cross-repo dependencies missing

### Endpoint Gap Matrix

| Client | Endpoint | Platform Status | Auth Match | Action Needed |
| ------ | -------- | --------------- | ---------- | ------------- |

### Auth Flow Alignment

| Flow | Extension | Flutter | Angular | Platform | Status |
| ---- | --------- | ------- | ------- | -------- | ------ |

### Path Mismatches

| Client Path | Platform Path | Affected Files | Fix |

### Stale Documentation

| File | Issue | Suggested Update |

### Missing Cross-Repo Dependencies

| Epic | Missing blockedBy | Suggested Link |

### Recommended Actions

1. [Prioritized list of issues to create or update]
```

### Phase 8: Optional — Create Issues

If the user approves, create GitHub issues for critical gaps discovered:

1. Use `/nightgauge:issue-create` for each gap
2. Link new issues to existing epics where appropriate
3. Set `blockedBy` relationships for cross-repo dependencies

## Decision Rules

- Do NOT create issues automatically — always present findings first and ask
- Prioritize gaps that block end-to-end functionality over cosmetic issues
- Skip probing endpoints if Docker containers are not running — report the skip
  and audit only client-side code and docs
- When a gap is already tracked by an existing open issue, note it rather than
  suggesting a duplicate

## Completion Checklist

- [ ] All 4 repos discovered and scanned
- [ ] Platform API probed (or skip noted if Docker not running)
- [ ] Client API calls extracted from all available repos
- [ ] Gap analysis complete with categorized findings
- [ ] Documentation freshness checked
- [ ] Cross-repo dependencies audited
- [ ] Report generated and presented to user
- [ ] User decision on issue creation recorded

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.