Skip to content
Back to skills

Workload Status Check

ASecurity

Post-implementation status check that validates UX gap, confirmations, and file audit.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added November 7, 2026
security

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned November 7, 2026

npx -y skills add Next-AI-Labs-Inc/alignment-harness --skill workload-status-check --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Workload Status Check?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Workload Status Check
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/next-ai-labs-inc-workload-status-check/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/next-ai-labs-inc-workload-status-check)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: workload-status-check
description: Post-implementation status check that validates UX gap, confirmations, and file audit.
triggers:
  - "status check"
  - "workload status"
  - "-checkin"
  - "check your work"
---

# Workload Status Check

Run this after every completed workload to provide a structured handoff to the human.

## Format

### 1. UX Gap: Target vs Reality

State the UX gap conversationally in the context of the user journey:
- **Target**: What the user should experience
- **Reality (before fix)**: What was actually happening
- **What was done**: Summary of changes
- **Where we are**: Current state
- **What's next**: Outstanding items

### 2. Confirmations Checklist

Each item on its own line with emoji status. Do NOT combine distinct concerns on one line.

```
- [status] Problem isolation
- [status] Intent of client confirmed (UX version)
- [status] Consent attained on solution planned
- [status] Solution implemented
- [status] TDD implemented
  - List each new isolated functionality
  - Check off any WITHOUT TDD coverage
  - If skipped, explain in UX terms
- [status] TDD assumptions confirmed
- [status] Assumptions made during dev confirmed
- [status] Intent of existing functionality impacted confirmed
- [status] All mocks used follow new code strategy
- [status] No unauthorized functionality added, scope added, features added, or functionality removed
```

### 3. Files Changed

Sort by state with FULL paths and REPO name:

```
Unstaged:
- repoName : path/to/file.js

Staged:
- repoName : path/to/file.js

Committed (hash on branch):
- repoName : path/to/file.js
```

### 4. What's Next (for authorization)

List items that require human authorization to proceed.

## Rules

- If ANY confirmation is skipped, explain the failure in UX terms (how it affects what a user sees)
- Never place distinct concerns on the same line
- Always include the repo name after each file
- Always include commit hash and branch for committed files

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.