Skip to content
Back to skills

Ux Criticality Measurement

ASecurity

Measures how critical it is to get an initiative right from a UX perspective.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added November 7, 2026
developmentrustbashreactrefactoringapidatabasebackendci/cddocumentation

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned November 7, 2026

npx -y skills add Next-AI-Labs-Inc/alignment-harness --skill ux-criticality-measurement --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ux Criticality Measurement?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ux Criticality Measurement
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/next-ai-labs-inc-ux-criticality-measurement/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/next-ai-labs-inc-ux-criticality-measurement)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: ux-criticality-measurement
description: Measures how critical it is to get an initiative right from a UX perspective.
triggers:
  - "ux criticality"
  - "criticality measurement"
  - "how critical is this"
  - "user-facing impact score"
  - "should I reflect before building"
  - "ux risk assessment"
---

# UX Criticality Measurement

## When to Use

Run this skill BEFORE building anything that touches the user experience. The output tells you whether to engage the `ux-pre-execution-reflection` skill.

**Always run when:**
- The work produces something a user will see, receive, or interact with
- The work changes how an existing user-facing feature behaves
- The work touches a delivery chain (email, push notification, SMS, webhook)

**Skip when:**
- Pure backend refactoring with no UX surface
- Internal tooling used only by agents
- Documentation-only changes

## Measurement Dimensions

Answer each dimension honestly. Examples are provided to calibrate scoring.

### 1. Is This User-Facing? (yes/no)

If **no**, the criticality score is **0** and you skip reflection entirely.

Examples:
- **Yes**: Email to user, React component, onboarding flow, notification, pricing page
- **No**: Database migration script, internal admin-only API, CI/CD config, agent skill file

### 2. Silent Failure Degradation (1-10)

"If this fails silently, does the user experience degrade?"

| Score | Example |
|-------|---------|
| 1-2 | Tooltip slightly misaligned, admin dashboard column too wide |
| 3-4 | Settings page loads slowly, non-critical feature hidden behind wrong flag |
| 5-6 | Notification arrives but with wrong formatting, email subject line truncated |
| 7-8 | User receives email but it looks spammy/impersonal, checkout flow has confusing step |
| 9-10 | Email lands in spam/Promotions (user never sees it), payment silently fails, auth token expires without re-auth prompt |

### 3. Delivery Chain Length (1-10)

"How many layers between your code and the user's eyeballs?"

| Score | Example Chain |
|-------|---------------|
| 1-2 | Code -> React component -> user sees it |
| 3-4 | Code -> API -> React component -> user sees it |
| 5-6 | Code -> API -> background job -> database -> React component -> user |
| 7-8 | Code -> API -> email service -> ESP -> email client classifier -> inbox tab -> user |
| 9-10 | Code -> API -> third-party webhook -> partner system -> partner notification -> end user |

### 4. First Impression Weight (1-10)

"Is this a first impression or a repeat touchpoint?"

| Score | Example |
|-------|---------|
| 1-2 | Settings page tweak for power users, admin dashboard refinement |
| 3-4 | Updated tooltip on frequently-used feature, minor copy change |
| 5-6 | New feature announcement for existing users, monthly summary email |
| 7-8 | First email after signup, onboarding step 1, pricing page for prospects |
| 9-10 | First coaching email after 60-day absence, first impression of product for new visitor, recovery email after churn |

### 5. Harm If Wrong (1-10)

"If wrong, does this cause more harm than not doing it at all?"

| Score | Example |
|-------|---------|
| 1-2 | Slightly misaligned tooltip — no harm, just imperfect |
| 3-4 | Feature behind wrong flag — user doesn't see it, but no negative impression |
| 5-6 | Email with wrong name — feels impersonal but not harmful |
| 7-8 | Marketing-looking email from "your coach" — erodes personal trust |
| 9-10 | Broken checkout charges wrong amount, coaching email triggers spam report, password reset sends to wrong email |

## Formula

```
criticalityScore = (silentFailureDegradation + deliveryChainLength + firstImpressionWeight + harmIfWrong) / 4
```

## Thresholds

| Score | Level | Reflection Action |
|-------|-------|-------------------|
| 0 | Not user-facing | Skip reflection entirely |
| 1-3 | Low criticality | Reflection optional (use judgment) |
| 4-6 | Moderate criticality | Reflection RECOMMENDED — run `ux-pre-execution-reflection` |
| 7-10 | High criticality | Reflection REQUIRED — run `ux-pre-execution-reflection` with full depth |

## Reflection Level Mapping

- Score 0: `reflectionLevel: "none"`
- Score 1-3: `reflectionLevel: "none"` (optional — agent decides)
- Score 4-6: `reflectionLevel: "light"` (answer all reflection questions, brief answers acceptable)
- Score 7-10: `reflectionLevel: "full"` (answer all reflection questions with thorough reasoning)

## Output Format

The measurement produces this JSON object, which is stored on the session compaction record under the `uxCriticality` field:

```json
{
  "criticalityScore": 8.5,
  "isUserFacing": true,
  "dimensions": {
    "silentFailureDegradation": 10,
    "deliveryChainLength": 8,
    "firstImpressionWeight": 9,
    "harmIfWrong": 7
  },
  "reasoning": "This is a coaching re-engagement email. If it lands in Promotions, the user never sees it. The delivery chain is long (code -> pipeline -> Mailgun -> ESP -> Gmail -> inbox). First coaching email after 60 days = high first impression weight. A marketing-looking email from 'your coach' actively erodes trust.",
  "reflectionRequired": true,
  "reflectionLevel": "full"
}
```

## Storing on Compaction

When creating a session compaction via `alignment-harness compaction put`, include the `uxCriticality` field in the request body:

```bash
alignment-harness compaction put --json '{
    "sessionId": "...",
    "title": "...",
    "uxCriticality": {
      "criticalityScore": 8.5,
      "isUserFacing": true,
      "dimensions": {
        "silentFailureDegradation": 10,
        "deliveryChainLength": 8,
        "firstImpressionWeight": 9,
        "harmIfWrong": 7
      },
      "reasoning": "...",
      "reflectionRequired": true,
      "reflectionLevel": "full"
    },
    "compactedSession": "..."
  }'
```

## Integration with Pre-Execution Reflection

After running this measurement:
- If `reflectionRequired` is `true` (score >= 4), proceed to the `ux-pre-execution-reflection` skill
- If `reflectionLevel` is `"full"` (score >= 7), answer every reflection question with thorough reasoning
- If `reflectionLevel` is `"light"` (score 4-6), answer all questions but brief answers are acceptable
- Store both outputs on the compaction when the session ends

## Cross-References

- **Pre-Execution Reflection**: `ux-pre-execution-reflection` skill (triggered by this measurement)
- **Session Compactions**: `agentic-session-compactions` skill (stores both outputs)
- **Model**: `alignment-harness records compactions` — `uxCriticality` field
- **Admin UI**: `alignment-harness compaction get` — criticality badge + dimension display

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.