Generate lean, actionable Product Requirements Documents from upstream design thinking artifacts or raw input. Use when a user needs to define what they're building with enough structure to guide development but without enterprise bloat. Outputs a PRD that feeds directly into UX specs and development prompts.
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add NeverSight/skills_feed --skill prd-generation --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Prd Generation?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/neversight-prd-generation)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: prd-generation
description: Generate lean, actionable Product Requirements Documents from upstream design thinking artifacts or raw input. Use when a user needs to define what they're building with enough structure to guide development but without enterprise bloat. Outputs a PRD that feeds directly into UX specs and development prompts.
---
# PRD Generator
Create right-sized Product Requirements Documents that solo devs and small teams can actually use.
## Why This Exists
Generates lean PRDs with enough structure to guide development without enterprise bloat.
## Input Requirements
This skill works best with upstream context from:
- `problem-framing` output (problem statement, target user, JTBD, assumptions)
- `user-modeling` output (personas, scenarios)
- `solution-scoping` output (feature priorities, MVP boundaries)
Can also work from scratch if user provides enough context about their idea.
## Workflow
### Step 1: Gather Context
If upstream artifacts exist, ingest them. If not, ask for:
- What are you building?
- Who is it for?
- What problem does it solve?
- What's the MVP scope?
### Step 2: Fill Gaps
Check for missing elements and ask targeted questions:
| Missing Element | Question |
|-----------------|----------|
| Success metrics | "How will you know this worked? What would you measure?" |
| Feature priorities | "If you could only ship one thing, what would it be?" |
| Constraints | "Any technical constraints? Timeline? Budget?" |
| Non-goals | "What are you explicitly NOT building?" |
Keep it conversational—don't interrogate.
### Step 3: Generate PRD
Use the output format below. Adapt sections based on project complexity.
## Output Format
**Automatically save the output to `design/05-prd.md` using the Write tool** while presenting it to the user.
```markdown
# PRD: [Project Name]
## Overview
[2-3 sentences: what this is and why it matters]
## Problem Statement
[One clear sentence: WHO has WHAT problem WHEN]
## Target User
[Specific description of primary user]
**Characteristics:**
- [Key trait 1]
- [Key trait 2]
- [Key trait 3]
## Goals & Success Metrics
| Goal | Metric | Target |
|------|--------|--------|
| [Goal 1] | [How measured] | [Success threshold] |
| [Goal 2] | [How measured] | [Success threshold] |
## User Stories
### Must Have (MVP)
- As a [user], I want to [action] so that [outcome]
- As a [user], I want to [action] so that [outcome]
- As a [user], I want to [action] so that [outcome]
### Should Have (v1.1)
- As a [user], I want to [action] so that [outcome]
- As a [user], I want to [action] so that [outcome]
### Could Have (Future)
- As a [user], I want to [action] so that [outcome]
## Features
### [Feature 1 Name]
**Priority:** Must Have
**Description:** [What it does]
**User value:** [Why it matters]
**Acceptance criteria:**
- [ ] [Criterion 1]
- [ ] [Criterion 2]
- [ ] [Criterion 3]
### [Feature 2 Name]
**Priority:** Must Have
**Description:** [What it does]
**User value:** [Why it matters]
**Acceptance criteria:**
- [ ] [Criterion 1]
- [ ] [Criterion 2]
### [Feature 3 Name]
**Priority:** Should Have
[Same structure]
## Scope
### In Scope (MVP)
- [What you're building]
- [What you're building]
### Out of Scope
- [What you're NOT building]
- [What you're NOT building]
### Future Considerations
- [What might come later]
## Assumptions & Risks
### Assumptions
- [Assumption 1]
- [Assumption 2]
### Risks
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|--------|------------|
| [Risk 1] | [High/Med/Low] | [How to address] |
| [Risk 2] | [High/Med/Low] | [How to address] |
## Technical Considerations
[Optional — include only if relevant]
- **Platform:** [Web/mobile/desktop]
- **Key integrations:** [APIs, services]
- **Data:** [Storage, persistence needs]
- **Constraints:** [Performance, security, compliance]
## Open Questions
- [Anything still unresolved]
- [Decisions needed before development]
## Appendix
[Optional — link to research, competitive analysis, wireframes]
```
## Adaptation Guidelines
**For simple projects (weekend build):**
- Skip Technical Considerations
- Collapse User Stories into Features
- Minimal Risks section
- 1-2 pages total
**For medium projects (side project, MVP):**
- Full structure as shown
- 2-4 pages total
**For complex projects (startup MVP, team project):**
- Add more detail to Features
- Expand Technical Considerations
- Include Appendix with research
- 4-6 pages total
## Writing Guidelines
- **Be specific, not generic** — "Users can filter tasks by due date" not "Users can filter tasks"
- **Acceptance criteria are testable** — Can you verify yes/no if it's done?
- **Priorities are honest** — If everything is "Must Have," nothing is
- **Out of Scope is explicit** — Prevents scope creep later
## Handoff
After presenting the PRD, ask:
> "Want to move to `/ux-specification` for detailed flows and screens, or go straight to `/prompt-export`?"
**Note:** File is automatically saved to `design/05-prd.md` for context preservation.Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!