Political Philosophy

---
name: political-philosophy
description: "Master political philosophy - justice, rights, liberty, democracy, state legitimacy. Use for: justice, political authority, rights, freedom, social contract. Triggers: 'justice', 'political', 'rights', 'liberty', 'freedom', 'democracy', 'Rawls', 'social contract', 'state', 'legitimacy', 'authority', 'equality', 'libertarianism', 'distributive justice', 'liberalism', 'communitarianism', 'republicanism'."
---

# Political Philosophy Skill

Master the fundamental questions of political life: What justifies the state? What is justice? What are our rights?

## Core Questions

| Question | Issue |
|----------|-------|
| Why obey the state? | Political obligation |
| What is justice? | Distributive principles |
| What are rights? | Nature and basis of rights |
| What is freedom? | Liberty, positive/negative |
| Who should rule? | Democratic theory |

---

## State Legitimacy

### Social Contract Theories

```
SOCIAL CONTRACT TRADITION
═════════════════════════

HOBBES (1588-1679)
├── State of nature: War of all against all
├── Life: "Solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, short"
├── Contract: Give up freedom for security
└── Result: Absolute sovereign (Leviathan)

LOCKE (1632-1704)
├── State of nature: Peace with inconveniences
├── Natural rights: Life, liberty, property
├── Contract: Limited government to protect rights
└── Result: Liberal constitutional state

ROUSSEAU (1712-1778)
├── State of nature: Noble savage, corrupted by society
├── Problem: How to be free yet bound by law?
├── Solution: General will (not will of all)
└── Result: Direct democracy, civic virtue
```

### Contemporary Social Contract

**Rawls**: Hypothetical contract behind veil of ignorance
**Gauthier**: Bargaining among rational self-interested agents
**Scanlon**: Principles no one could reasonably reject

---

## Justice

### Rawls's Theory

```
RAWLSIAN JUSTICE
════════════════

ORIGINAL POSITION
├── Hypothetical choice situation
├── Veil of ignorance: Don't know your place
├── Rational, self-interested choosers
└── What principles would you choose?

TWO PRINCIPLES
1. LIBERTY PRINCIPLE
   └── Equal basic liberties for all
   └── Speech, conscience, association, etc.

2. DIFFERENCE PRINCIPLE
   └── Inequalities only if they benefit worst-off
   └── With fair equality of opportunity

PRIORITY:
Liberty > Fair opportunity > Difference principle
```

### Alternative Theories

| Theory | Key Thinker | Principle |
|--------|-------------|-----------|
| Utilitarianism | Mill | Maximize total welfare |
| Libertarianism | Nozick | Minimal state, property rights |
| Communitarianism | Sandel, MacIntyre | Community shapes justice |
| Capabilities | Sen, Nussbaum | Ensure capabilities for all |

### Nozick's Entitlement Theory

```
LIBERTARIAN JUSTICE
═══════════════════

JUSTICE IN ACQUISITION
├── How did you originally get it?
└── Must be legitimate

JUSTICE IN TRANSFER
├── Voluntary exchange
└── Gift, sale, etc.

RECTIFICATION
├── Correct past injustices
└── Compensation, restitution

MINIMAL STATE
├── Only protection services
├── No redistribution
└── "Taxation is forced labor"
```

---

## Liberty

### Negative vs. Positive Freedom

**Negative** (Berlin): Freedom FROM interference
- You're free if no one stops you
- Liberal tradition

**Positive**: Freedom TO achieve goals
- You're free if you can realize your potential
- May require resources, support

### Republican Liberty

**Non-Domination** (Pettit):
- Freedom as absence of arbitrary power over you
- Not just non-interference
- Slave with kind master is still unfree

---

## Rights

### Nature of Rights

**Natural Rights**: Pre-political, inherent in persons
**Legal Rights**: Created by law, conventional
**Moral Rights**: May or may not be legal

### Rights as Trumps (Dworkin)

Rights override utilitarian calculations
Individual rights > Collective good

### Will Theory vs. Interest Theory

**Will Theory**: Rights protect choices
**Interest Theory**: Rights protect interests

---

## Democracy

### Justifications

| Justification | Claim |
|---------------|-------|
| Intrinsic | Democratic participation is valuable in itself |
| Instrumental | Democracy produces best outcomes |
| Epistemic | Collective wisdom (Condorcet) |
| Procedural | Fair procedure regardless of outcome |

### Problems

- Tyranny of majority
- Voter ignorance
- Special interests
- Minority rights

---

## Key Debates

### Liberty vs. Equality

- Trade-off or compatible?
- Economic liberty vs. economic equality
- Formal vs. substantive equality

### Individual vs. Community

- Liberal: Individual prior to community
- Communitarian: Community shapes individuals
- Identity, tradition, solidarity

### Multiculturalism

- Cultural rights
- Recognition
- Integration vs. assimilation

---

## Key Vocabulary

| Term | Meaning |
|------|---------|
| Legitimacy | Rightful authority |
| Sovereignty | Supreme power |
| Social contract | Agreement creating state |
| General will | Common good (Rousseau) |
| Veil of ignorance | Not knowing one's place |
| Difference principle | Benefit worst-off |
| Negative liberty | Freedom from interference |
| Positive liberty | Freedom to achieve |
| Natural rights | Pre-political rights |
| Distributive justice | Fair distribution |

---

## Integration with Repository

### Related Themes
- `thoughts/morality/`: Justice, rights
- `thoughts/free_will/`: Political freedom