Verify skills work under pressure and resist rationalization using the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle. Critical for discipline-enforcing skills. - Purpose - Test skill effectiveness with pressure scenarios - Output - Verification report with rationalization table ```bash /test-skill ["skill path or name"] ```
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill customaize-agent --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Customaize Agent?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/neolabhq-customaize-agent-context-engineering-kit)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
# /test-skill - Skill Pressure Testing
Verify skills work under pressure and resist rationalization using the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle. Critical for discipline-enforcing skills.
- Purpose - Test skill effectiveness with pressure scenarios
- Output - Verification report with rationalization table
```bash
/test-skill ["skill path or name"]
```
## Usage Examples
```bash
# Test a TDD enforcement skill
> /test-skill tdd
# Test a custom skill by path
> /test-skill ~/.claude/skills/code-review/
# Start testing workflow
> /test-skill
```
## Arguments
Optional path to skill being tested or skill name.
## How It Works
1. **RED Phase - Baseline Testing**: Run scenarios WITHOUT the skill
- Create pressure scenarios (3+ combined pressures)
- Document agent behavior and rationalizations verbatim
- Identify patterns in failures
2. **GREEN Phase - Write Minimal Skill**: Address baseline failures
- Write skill addressing specific observed rationalizations
- Run same scenarios WITH skill
- Verify agent now complies
3. **REFACTOR Phase - Close Loopholes**: Iterate until bulletproof
- Identify NEW rationalizations from testing
- Add explicit counters for each loophole
- Build rationalization table
- Create red flags list
- Re-test until bulletproof
## Pressure Types
| Pressure | Example |
|----------|---------|
| **Time** | Emergency, deadline, deploy window closing |
| **Sunk cost** | Hours of work, "waste" to delete |
| **Authority** | Senior says skip it, manager overrides |
| **Economic** | Job, promotion, company survival at stake |
| **Exhaustion** | End of day, already tired, want to go home |
| **Social** | Looking dogmatic, seeming inflexible |
| **Pragmatic** | "Being pragmatic vs dogmatic" |
## Best Practices
- Combine 3+ pressures - Single pressure tests are too weak
- Document verbatim - Capture exact rationalizations, not summaries
- Iterate completely - Continue REFACTOR until no new rationalizations
- Use meta-testing - Ask agents how skill could have been clearer
- Test all skill types - Discipline-enforcing, technique, pattern, and reference skills need different tests
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!