Claude Skills by NeoLabHQ

Reconcile the project's FPF state with recent repository changes

creates draft task file in .specs/tasks/draft/ with original user intent

Evaluate and improve Claude Code commands, skills, and agents. Use when testing prompt effectiveness, validating context engineering choices, or measuring improvement quality.

Comprehensive A3 one-page problem analysis with root cause and action plan

Auto-selects best Kaizen method (Gemba Walk, Value Stream, or Muda) for target

Analyze a GitHub issue and create a detailed technical specification

Comprehensive guide for skill development based on Anthropic's official best practices - use for complex skills requiring detailed structure

Add line-specific review comments to pull requests using GitHub CLI API

Use when creating or developing, before writing code or implementation plans - refines rough ideas into fully-formed designs through collaborative questioning, alternative exploration, and incremental validation. Don't use during clear 'mechanical' processes

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

Systematic Fishbone analysis exploring problem causes across six categories

Create well-formatted commits with conventional commit messages and emoji

Understand the components, mechanics, and constraints of context in agent systems. Use when writing, editing, or optimizing commands, skills, or sub-agents prompts.

Comprehensive guide for creating Claude Code agents with proper structure, triggering conditions, system prompts, and validation - combines official Anthropic best practices with proven patterns

Interactive assistant for creating new Claude commands with proper structure, patterns, and MCP tool integration

Create and configure git hooks with intelligent project analysis, suggestions, and automated testing

Generate ideas in one shot using creative sampling

Create pull requests using GitHub CLI with proper templates and formatting

Use when found gap or repetative issue, that produced by you or implemenataion agent. Esentially use it each time when you say "You absolutly right, I should have done it differently." -> need create rule for this issue so it not appears again.

Guide for creating effective skills. This command should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends Claude's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations. Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment - applies TDD to process documentation by testing with subagents before writing, iterating until bulletproof against rationalization

Create a workflow command that orchestrates multi-step execution through sub-agents with file-based task prompts

Comprehensive multi-perspective review using specialized judges with debate and consensus building

Manage evidence freshness by identifying stale decisions and providing governance actions

Use before writing any type of tests. Distills 14 industry sources into deterministic decision gates, schemas, and worked test examples.

Execute a task with sub-agent implementation and LLM-as-a-judge verification with automatic retry loop

Execute tasks through competitive multi-agent generation, meta-judge evaluation specification, multi-judge evaluation, and evidence-based synthesis

Run independent tasks concurrently across multiple files or targets using parallel sub-agents, with per-task model selection and LLM-as-a-judge verification. Use when tasks do not depend on each other and can run side by side.

Execute one complex task as ordered, dependent steps run sequentially, passing context from each step to the next, with per-step LLM-as-a-judge verification. Use when later steps depend on the results of earlier ones.

Systematically fix all failing tests after business logic changes or refactoring

Use when adding metadata to commits without changing history, tracking review status, test results, code quality annotations, or supplementing commit messages post-hoc - provides git notes commands and patterns for attaching non-invasive metadata to Git objects.

Use when working on multiple branches simultaneously, context switching without stashing, reviewing PRs while developing, testing in isolation, or comparing implementations across branches - provides git worktree commands and workflow patterns for parallel development with multiple working directories.

Implement a task step by step with automated LLM-as-Judge verification at the end of each phase

Evaluate solutions through multi-round debate between independent judges until consensus

Launch a meta-judge then a judge sub-agent to evaluate results produced in the current conversation

Launch an intelligent sub-agent with automatic model selection based on task complexity, specialized agent matching, Zero-shot CoT reasoning, and mandatory self-critique verification

Load all open issues from GitHub and save them as markdown files

Use to load open/unresolved PR review comments then aggregate them as tasks in .specs/comments/*.md for parallel agents to fix.

Curates insights from reflections and critiques into CLAUDE.md using Agentic Context Engineering

Design multi-agent architectures for complex tasks. Use when single-agent context limits are exceeded, when tasks decompose naturally into subtasks, or when specializing agents improves quality.

Iterative PDCA cycle for systematic experimentation and continuous improvement

Refine a draft task specification into a fully planned, implementation-ready task with acceptance criteria, architecture, per-step sub-task files and verifiable phases

Use this skill when you writing commands, hooks, skills for Agent, or prompts for sub agents or any other LLM interaction, including optimizing prompts, improving LLM outputs, or designing production prompt templates.

Execute complete FPF cycle from hypothesis generation to decision

Search the FPF knowledge base and display hypothesis details with assurance information

Reflect on previus response and output, based on Self-refinement framework for iterative improvement with complexity triage and verification

Reset the FPF reasoning cycle to start fresh

Verify what PR review comments have been addressed (committed/pushed OR uncommitted local changes) and resolve the threads that are genuinely fixed or no longer relevant.

Review your local uncommitted working-tree changes (git diff plus untracked files) and return actionable improvement suggestions. Use before committing, when nothing has been pushed yet.

Review an existing GitHub pull request and post inline review comments on its diff. Use when the changes are on an opened PR rather than your local working tree.

Use when errors occur deep in execution and you need to trace back to find the original trigger - systematically traces bugs backward through call stack, adding instrumentation when needed, to identify source of invalid data or incorrect behavior