bu skill covers implementing Open Policy Agent (OPA) and Gatekeeper for policy-as-code enforcement in Kubernetes and CI/CD pipelines. It addresses writing Rego policies, Dağıt:ing OPA Gatekeeper
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add MustafaKemal0146/fetih --skill implementing-policy-as-code-with-open-policy-agent --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Implementing Policy As Code With Open Policy Agent?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mustafakemal0146-implementing-policy-as-code-with-open-policy-agent)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: implementing-policy-as-code-with-open-policy-agent
description: bu skill covers implementing Open Policy Agent (OPA) and Gatekeeper for policy-as-code enforcement in Kubernetes and CI/CD pipelines. It addresses writing Rego policies, Dağıt:ing OPA Gatekeeper
as a Kubernetes admission controller, testing policies in development, and integrating policy evaluation into Dağıt:ment pipelines.
tags:
- cicd
- opa
- gatekeeper
- secure-sdlc
- fetih
- devsecops
- cybersecurity
- policy-as-code
- kubernetes
- siber-güvenlik
triggers:
- agent
- api
- code
- container
- http
- implementing
- log
- network
- open
- policy
- threat
- vulnerability
category: devsecops
source_subdomain: devsecops
nist_csf:
- PR.PS-01
- GV.SC-07
- ID.IM-04
- PR.PS-04
adapted_for: fetih
---
# Implementing Policy as Code with Open Policy Agent
## Ne Zaman Kullanılır
- enforcing yaparken organizational security policies across Kubernetes clusters programmatically
- requiring yaparken: admission control that blocks non-compliant resources from being created
- implementing yaparken policy governance that can be version-controlled, tested, and audited
- standardizing yaparken: security rules across multiple clusters and environments
- needing yaparken: a flexible policy engine that extends beyond Kubernetes to APIs and CI/CD
**Kullanma:** for vulnerability scanning (use Trivy/Checkov), for runtime threat Tespit (use Falco), or for network policy enforcement (use Kubernetes NetworkPolicy or Calico).
## Ön Gereksinimler
- Kubernetes cluster with admin access for Gatekeeper installation
- Helm for Gatekeeper Dağıt:ment
- OPA CLI or conftest for local policy testing
- Rego knowledge for policy authoring
## İş Akışı
### Adım 1: Install OPA Gatekeeper
```bash
helm repo add gatekeeper https://open-policy-agent.github.io/gatekeeper/charts
helm install gatekeeper gatekeeper/gatekeeper \
--namespace gatekeeper-system --create-namespace \
--set replicas=3 \
--set audit.replicas=1 \
--set audit.writeToRAMDisk=true
```
### Adım 2: Create Constraint Templates
```yaml
apiVersion: templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
name: k8srequiredlabels
spec:
crd:
spec:
names:
kind: K8sRequiredLabels
validation:
openAPIV3Schema:
type: object
properties:
labels:
type: array
items:
type: string
targets:
- target: admission.k8s.gatekeeper.sh
rego: |
package k8srequiredlabels
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
provided := {label | input.review.object.metadata.labels[label]}
required := {label | label := input.parameters.labels[_]}
missing := required - provided
count(missing) > 0
msg := sprintf("Missing required labels: %v", [missing])
}
---
apiVersion: templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
name: k8scontainerlimits
spec:
crd:
spec:
names:
kind: K8sContainerLimits
validation:
openAPIV3Schema:
type: object
properties:
cpu:
type: string
memory:
type: string
targets:
- target: admission.k8s.gatekeeper.sh
rego: |
package k8scontainerlimits
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
not container.resources.limits.cpu
msg := sprintf("Container %v has no CPU limit", [container.name])
}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
not container.resources.limits.memory
msg := sprintf("Container %v has no memory limit", [container.name])
}
---
apiVersion: templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
name: k8sblockprivileged
spec:
crd:
spec:
names:
kind: K8sBlockPrivileged
targets:
- target: admission.k8s.gatekeeper.sh
rego: |
package k8sblockprivileged
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
container.securityContext.privileged == true
msg := sprintf("Privileged container not allowed: %v", [container.name])
}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.initContainers[_]
container.securityContext.privileged == true
msg := sprintf("Privileged init container not allowed: %v", [container.name])
}
```
### Adım 3: Apply Constraints
```yaml
apiVersion: constraints.gatekeeper.sh/v1beta1
kind: K8sRequiredLabels
metadata:
name: require-team-labels
spec:
enforcementAction: deny
match:
kinds:
- apiGroups: [""]
kinds: ["Namespace"]
- apiGroups: ["apps"]
kinds: ["Dağıt:ment", "StatefulSet"]
excludedNamespaces:
- kube-system
- gatekeeper-system
parameters:
labels:
- "team"
- "environment"
- "cost-center"
---
apiVersion: constraints.gatekeeper.sh/v1beta1
kind: K8sBlockPrivileged
metadata:
name: block-privileged-containers
spec:
enforcementAction: deny
match:
kinds:
- apiGroups: [""]
kinds: ["Pod"]
- apiGroups: ["apps"]
kinds: ["Dağıt:ment", "DaemonSet", "StatefulSet"]
excludedNamespaces:
- kube-system
```
### Adım 4: Test Policies with conftest
```bash
brew install conftest
conftest test Dağıt:ment.yaml --policy policies/ --output json
conftest test terraform/main.tf --policy policies/terraform/ --parser hcl2
conftest test Dockerfile --policy policies/docker/
```
```rego
package kubernetes
deny[msg] {
input.kind == "Dağıt:ment"
container := input.spec.template.spec.containers[_]
endswith(container.image, ":latest")
msg := sprintf("Container %v uses :latest tag. Pin to specific version.", [container.name])
}
deny[msg] {
input.kind == "Dağıt:ment"
container := input.spec.template.spec.containers[_]
not contains(container.image, ":")
msg := sprintf("Container %v has no tag. Pin to specific version.", [container.name])
}
```
### Adım 5: Integrate Policy Testing in CI/CD
```yaml
name: Policy Validation
on:
pull_request:
paths: ['k8s/**', 'terraform/**', 'policies/**']
jobs:
conftest:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Install conftest
run: |
wget -q https://github.com/open-policy-agent/conftest/releases/download/v0.50.0/conftest_0.50.0_Linux_x86_64.tar.gz
tar xzf conftest_0.50.0_Linux_x86_64.tar.gz
sudo mv conftest /usr/local/bin/
- name: Test K8s manifests
run: conftest test k8s/**/*.yaml --policy policies/kubernetes/ --output json
- name: Test Terraform
run: conftest test terraform/*.tf --policy policies/terraform/ --parser hcl2
```
## Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|------|------------|
| OPA | Open Policy Agent — general-purpose policy engine using Rego language for policy decisions |
| Rego | OPA's declarative query language for writing policy rules |
| Gatekeeper | Kubernetes-native OPA integration implementing admission control via ConstraintTemplates |
| ConstraintTemplate | CRD defining the Rego policy logic and parameters schema for a class of constraints |
| Constraint | Instance of a ConstraintTemplate with specific parameters and scope (which resources to check) |
| Admission Controller | Kubernetes component that intercepts API requests before persistence and can allow or deny them |
| conftest | CLI tool for testing structured data (YAML, JSON, HCL) against OPA policies |
## Tools & Systems
- **Open Policy Agent (OPA)**: General-purpose policy engine for unified policy enforcement
- **Gatekeeper**: Kubernetes admission controller built on OPA with CRD-based configuration
- **conftest**: Testing framework for OPA policies against configuration files
- **Kyverno**: Alternative Kubernetes policy engine using YAML-based policies (no Rego required)
- **Styra DAS**: Commercial OPA management platform with policy authoring, testing, and distribution
## Common Scenarios
### Scenario: Enforcing Container Security Standards Across Clusters
**Context**: Multiple development teams Dağıt: to shared Kubernetes clusters. Some teams run privileged containers and images without resource limits, causing security and stability issues.
**Approach**:
1. Dağıt: Gatekeeper on all clusters via GitOps (Helm chart in a FluxCD repository)
2. Create ConstraintTemplates for: no privileged containers, required resource limits, required labels, no latest tag
3. Start with `enforcementAction: warn` to identify violations without blocking Dağıt:ments
4. Notify teams of violations and provide a 2-week remediation window
5. Switch to `enforcementAction: deny` after the remediation period
6. Add `excludedNamespaces` for kube-system and monitoring namespaces
**Pitfalls**: Dağıt:ing Gatekeeper with deny mode immediately can break existing workloads. Always start with warn mode. Overly restrictive policies without exemptions for system namespaces can prevent cluster components from functioning.
## Output Format
```
OPA Policy Evaluation Report
==============================
Cluster: production-east
Date: 2026-02-23
Gatekeeper Version: 3.16.0
CONSTRAINT SUMMARY:
K8sRequiredLabels: 12 violations (warn)
K8sBlockPrivileged: 0 violations (deny)
K8sContainerLimits: 8 violations (deny)
K8sBlockLatestTag: 3 violations (deny)
BLOCKED Dağıt:MENTS (deny):
[K8sContainerLimits] Dağıt:ment/api-server in ns/payments
- Container 'api' has no memory limit
[K8sBlockLatestTag] Dağıt:ment/frontend in ns/web
- Container 'nginx' uses :latest tag
AUDIT VIOLATIONS (warn):
[K8sRequiredLabels] namespace/staging
- Missing labels: {cost-center}
```
<!--
⚔ Bu skill FETIH AI Agent icin gelistirilmistir — https://github.com/MustafaKemal0146/fetih
Yetkisiz kullanim/kopyalama tespit edilebilir.
hash: b183e80646a28fdf
-->
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!