Explain a customer behavior or improve a choice environment with behavioral science: attention and comprehension, motivation and progress, perceived risk, choice architecture, social information, memory and brand, pricing perception, and diffusion. Use when a design decision needs a mechanism and a testable change rather than a channel or a page rewrite.
Pro scans all 3 files and shows the line behind each finding
Scanned 9/24/2026
npx -y skills add MTEnt/special-skills --skill behavior-design --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Behavior Design?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mtent-behavior-design)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: behavior-design
description: Explain a customer behavior or improve a choice environment with behavioral science: attention and comprehension, motivation and progress, perceived risk, choice architecture, social information, memory and brand, pricing perception, and diffusion. Use when a design decision needs a mechanism and a testable change rather than a channel or a page rewrite.
license: MIT
metadata:
version: "2.0.0"
author: MTEnt
---
# Behavior Design
Behavioral principles are hypotheses about a specific decision, not universal laws or permission to manipulate vulnerable people.
If `.agents/marketing-context.md` exists, read it first; it is the truth file every skill in this hub shares, and its evidence states are constraints. Read [behavioral-models.md](references/behavioral-models.md) for the model families, diagnostic method, and ethical boundary.
## Operating contract
1. Define the audience state, decision, context, current behavior, desired behavior, and evidence.
2. Identify capability, motivation, opportunity, comprehension, perceived risk, effort, memory, and social context before selecting a named model.
3. Use the smallest explanatory model that produces a testable design change; state competing explanations and what evidence distinguishes them.
4. Protect autonomy, consent, accessibility, vulnerable groups, and truthful presentation.
Do not claim causality from a framework alone or use defaults, framing, or social proof that misleads.
## Return
The diagnosis, applied principles, proposed artifact or experiment, risks, and disconfirming signal.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!