Pre-execution governance for IAM and permission escalation changes. Use when an agent or workflow proposes granting, expanding, or assuming higher privileges and you need deterministic ALLOW/BLOCK/REQUIRE_REWRITE decisions with strict schema validation, idempotency, and board-native audit artifacts.
Scanned 9/7/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add modbender/skill-library-mcp --skill consensus-permission-escalation-guard --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Consensus Permission Escalation Guard?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/modbender-consensus-permission-escalation-guard)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: consensus-permission-escalation-guard
description: Pre-execution governance for IAM and permission escalation changes. Use when an agent or workflow proposes granting, expanding, or assuming higher privileges and you need deterministic ALLOW/BLOCK/REQUIRE_REWRITE decisions with strict schema validation, idempotency, and board-native audit artifacts.
version: 0.1.12
homepage: https://github.com/kaicianflone/consensus-permission-escalation-guard
source: https://github.com/kaicianflone/consensus-permission-escalation-guard
upstream:
consensus-guard-core: https://github.com/kaicianflone/consensus-guard-core
metadata:
openclaw:
requires:
bins:
- node
- tsx
env:
- CONSENSUS_STATE_FILE
- CONSENSUS_STATE_ROOT
install:
- kind: node
package: consensus-permission-escalation-guard
bins:
- node
- tsx
---
# consensus-permission-escalation-guard
`consensus-permission-escalation-guard` is the final safety gate before privilege elevation is applied.
## What this skill does
- validates escalation requests against a strict input schema (reject unknown fields)
- evaluates hard-block and rewrite policy flags for IAM risk patterns
- runs persona-weighted voting (or aggregates external votes)
- returns one of: `ALLOW | BLOCK | REQUIRE_REWRITE`
- writes decision artifacts for replay/audit
## Decision policy shape
Hard-block examples:
- wildcard permissions (`*`, `: *`, broad owner/admin jumps)
- missing ticket reference when required
- break-glass escalation without incident reference
- separation-of-duties conflicts (e.g., create + approve authority)
Rewrite examples:
- weak or non-actionable justification
- temporary duration exceeds policy limit
- production escalation requires explicit human confirmation gate
## Runtime and safety model
- runtime binaries: `node`, `tsx`
- network behavior: none in deterministic guard logic
- environment config read by this package: `CONSENSUS_STATE_FILE`, `CONSENSUS_STATE_ROOT`
- filesystem writes: consensus board/state artifacts under configured state path
## Invoke contract
- `invoke(input, opts?) -> Promise<OutputJson | ErrorJson>`
Modes:
- `mode="persona"` (default): uses local deterministic persona defaults for internal voting
- `mode="external_agent"`: consume `external_votes[]`, then aggregate and enforce policy deterministically
## Install
```bash
npm i consensus-permission-escalation-guard
```
## Quick start
```bash
node --import tsx run.js --input ./examples/input.json
```
## Tests
```bash
npm test
```
Test coverage includes schema rejection, hard-block paths, rewrite paths, allow paths, idempotent retries, and external-agent aggregation behavior.
Note: this skill depends on `consensus-guard-core` for aggregation/state helpers; review that package alongside this one for full runtime auditability.
See also: `SECURITY-ASSURANCE.md` for threat model, runtime boundaries, and deployment hardening guidance.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!