Skip to content
Back to skills

Analyze

ASecurity

Deep analysis and investigation

  • 28 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added May 28, 2026
code-qualitydebugginggitsecurityperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 28, 2026

npx -y skills add MeroZemory/oh-my-droid --skill analyze --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Analyze?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Analyze
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/merozemory-analyze/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/merozemory-analyze)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: analyze
description: Deep analysis and investigation
---

# Deep Analysis Mode

[ANALYSIS MODE ACTIVATED]

## Objective

Conduct thorough analysis of the specified target (code, architecture, issue, bug, performance bottleneck, security concern).

## Approach

1. **Gather Context**
   - Read relevant files
   - Check git history if relevant
   - Review related issues/PRs if applicable

2. **Analyze Systematically**
   - Identify patterns and antipatterns
   - Trace execution flows
   - Map dependencies and relationships
   - Check for edge cases

   **For Debugging/Bug Analysis (4-Phase Protocol)**

   When analyzing bugs or issues, follow systematic debugging:

   - **Root Cause First** - Never skip to fixes
     - Read ALL error messages
     - Reproduce consistently
     - Document hypothesis before looking at code

   - **Pattern Analysis** - Find working vs broken
     - Compare with working similar code
     - Identify the specific delta

   - **3-Failure Circuit Breaker** - If stuck:
     - After 3 failed hypotheses, question the architecture
     - The bug may be elsewhere entirely

3. **Synthesize Findings**
   - Root cause (for bugs)
   - Design decisions and tradeoffs (for architecture)
   - Bottlenecks and hotspots (for performance)
   - Vulnerabilities and risks (for security)

4. **Provide Recommendations**
   - Concrete, actionable next steps
   - Prioritized by impact
   - Consider maintainability and technical debt

## Output Format

Present findings clearly:
- **Summary** (2-3 sentences)
- **Key Findings** (bulleted list)
- **Analysis** (detailed explanation)
- **Recommendations** (prioritized)

Stay objective. Cite file paths and line numbers. No speculation without evidence.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…