Converts free-text radiology narratives into structured findings and impression — with measurements, laterality, anatomy, and follow-up recommendations — after OpenMed NER. Use when the user has a CT/MRI/X-ray/ultrasound/mammography report and needs the sections split (technique, comparison, findings, impression), lesion measurements and laterality captured, BI-RADS / Lung-RADS assessment categories pulled, or incidental findings and recommended follow-up tracked. Trigger keywords: radiology ...
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add maziyarpanahi/openmed --skill structuring-radiology-reports --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Structuring Radiology Reports?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/maziyarpanahi-structuring-radiology-reports)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: structuring-radiology-reports
description: "Converts free-text radiology narratives into structured findings and impression — with measurements, laterality, anatomy, and follow-up recommendations — after OpenMed NER. Use when the user has a CT/MRI/X-ray/ultrasound/mammography report and needs the sections split (technique, comparison, findings, impression), lesion measurements and laterality captured, BI-RADS / Lung-RADS assessment categories pulled, or incidental findings and recommended follow-up tracked. Trigger keywords: radiology report, findings, impression, RadLex, DICOM-SR, BI-RADS, Lung-RADS, ACR, laterality, measurement, nodule, incidental finding, follow-up, structured reporting. Pairs after OpenMed: run openmed.analyze_text on the report (Anatomy/Disease/measurement entities), then assemble structured findings. De-identify the report first. Decision-support only — not a diagnostic medical device."
license: Apache-2.0
metadata:
project: OpenMed
category: imaging-ocr
pairs: after
version: "1.0"
---
# Structuring radiology reports
A radiology report is prose, but its *meaning* is structured: a **technique**, a
**comparison**, a list of **findings** (each with anatomy, laterality, and a
measurement), and an **impression** that may carry an **assessment category**
(BI-RADS, Lung-RADS) and a **follow-up recommendation**. This skill turns the
narrative into that structure so findings are trackable — especially
**incidental findings** that need downstream follow-up.
OpenMed extracts the anatomy, disease/finding, and measurement spans on-device;
this skill organizes them into sectioned, coded findings. It is
**decision-support, not a diagnostic device** — every structured finding must be
attributable back to its source sentence for radiologist review.
## When to use
- You have a CT/MRI/X-ray/US/mammography report and need
`{technique, comparison, findings[], impression}` with measurements and
laterality.
- You must capture **BI-RADS** (breast) or **Lung-RADS** (lung screening)
assessment categories and the recommended action.
- You need to **track incidental findings** and the follow-up interval/modality
the report recommends.
- You are mapping findings toward **RadLex** terms or a **DICOM-SR** structured
report.
## Quick start
```python
import openmed
report = (
"TECHNIQUE: CT chest without contrast.\n"
"COMPARISON: CT 2023-11-02.\n"
"FINDINGS: A 8 mm solid nodule is noted in the right upper lobe, "
"unchanged. No pleural effusion.\n"
"IMPRESSION: 8 mm right upper lobe nodule, stable. Lung-RADS 2. "
"Recommend annual low-dose CT screening."
)
# 1) De-identify the report on-device first (synthetic example shown).
deid = openmed.deidentify(report, policy="hipaa_safe_harbor")
text = deid.deidentified_text
# 2) Run NER for anatomy / finding / measurement spans.
ents = openmed.analyze_text(
text,
model_name="anatomy_detection_superclinical", # Anatomy category
output_format="dict",
)["entities"]
# 3) Split sections by header, then attach entities + measurements per finding.
import re
SECTION = re.compile(r"(?im)^(TECHNIQUE|COMPARISON|FINDINGS|IMPRESSION)\s*:")
sections, last, name = {}, 0, None
for m in SECTION.finditer(text):
if name: sections[name] = text[last:m.start()].strip()
name, last = m.group(1).upper(), m.end()
if name: sections[name] = text[last:].strip()
structured = {
"technique": sections.get("TECHNIQUE"),
"comparison": sections.get("COMPARISON"),
"findings": _split_findings(sections.get("FINDINGS", "")), # one per sentence
"impression": sections.get("IMPRESSION"),
"measurements": re.findall(r"\b\d+(?:\.\d+)?\s?(?:mm|cm)\b", text),
"laterality": sorted({w for w in ("right", "left", "bilateral")
if re.search(rf"\b{w}\b", text, re.I)}),
"assessment": (re.search(r"\b(?:BI-RADS|Lung-RADS)\s*\d[A-C]?\b", text, re.I)
or [None])[0] if re.search(r"RADS", text, re.I) else None,
"follow_up": _extract_followup(sections.get("IMPRESSION", "")),
}
```
`_split_findings` / `_extract_followup` are your sentence splitter and a
recommendation matcher ("recommend …", "follow-up in N months"); keep each
finding tied to its source sentence offsets.
## Workflow
1. **De-identify first.** `openmed.deidentify(report, policy=...)`; structure
from `deidentified_text`. Patient name, MRN, accession, and dates go before
anything is stored or shared.
2. **Split sections** by the standard headers (TECHNIQUE, COMPARISON, FINDINGS,
IMPRESSION; also HISTORY/INDICATION). Reports vary — fall back to position if
headers are missing.
3. **Run `analyze_text`** for anatomy and finding entities; capture measurements
("8 mm", "1.2 cm") and laterality ("right", "left", "bilateral") near each
finding.
4. **Build one structured finding per observation**: `{anatomy, finding,
laterality, measurement, change_vs_prior, source_offsets}`. "Unchanged",
"stable", "increased", "new" capture temporal change against the comparison.
5. **Pull the assessment category** (BI-RADS 0-6, Lung-RADS 1-4X) from the
impression and the **recommended follow-up** (modality + interval).
6. **Flag incidental findings** — findings unrelated to the exam indication — and
route them to a follow-up tracker so they aren't lost.
7. **Map toward RadLex / DICOM-SR** if you need coded interoperability, and
surface the whole structure to a radiologist for verification.
## Hand-off to / from OpenMed
OpenMed's `analyze_text` returns a `dict`; `result["entities"]` items carry
`text`, `label`, `confidence`, `start`, `end`.
- **From** `extracting-clinical-entities`: Anatomy and Disease/finding entities
populate each structured finding; keep offsets so every field traces to a
source sentence.
- **From** `extracting-lab-tables` / OCR: if the report is a scan, OCR it first
(`openmed.multimodal.ocr.ocr`), then run NER on the recognized text.
- **From** `segmenting-clinical-sections`: reuse section detection if your reports
don't use canonical headers.
- **To** `building-patient-timelines`: dated findings + change-vs-prior feed a
longitudinal view (e.g. nodule size over time).
- **To** `extracting-dicom-metadata`: pair the structured findings with the
study's DICOM metadata when assembling a DICOM-SR object.
- **De-identify** with `deidentifying-clinical-text` (`openmed.deidentify`)
before any export. Everything runs **on-device**.
## Edge cases & gotchas
- **Negation and uncertainty change meaning.** "No pleural effusion" and "cannot
exclude metastasis" are findings *about* absence/uncertainty — don't record
them as positive findings. Use `resolving-clinical-context`
(`openmed.clinical`) for negation/hedging before asserting a finding.
- **Laterality errors are clinically dangerous.** "Right" vs "left" must bind to
the correct finding; a misattributed side can drive wrong-site decisions. Tie
laterality to the nearest anatomy span by offset, not document-wide.
- **Measurements need their unit and axis.** "8 mm" vs "0.8 cm" are equal; a
bare "8" is ambiguous. Capture the unit; for masses, capture all reported
dimensions ("2.1 x 1.4 cm"), not just the first.
- **Assessment categories have controlled value sets.** BI-RADS 0-6 and
Lung-RADS 1, 2, 3, 4A, 4B, 4X each map to a defined management action — don't
invent or round categories; pull the literal value from the impression.
- **Incidental findings get lost.** A renal cyst mentioned in a chest CT is the
classic missed follow-up. Explicitly separate incidental from
indication-related findings and push incidentals to a tracker.
- **The impression is the actionable summary**, but findings may contain detail
the impression omits — structure both, and prefer the impression for
follow-up/assessment.
- **Decision-support disclaimer.** This is not a diagnostic medical device; it
organizes text a radiologist authored. Every structured field must be reviewable
against its source. Do not auto-act on a derived category or follow-up without
clinician sign-off.
## Standards & references
- RadLex (RSNA radiology lexicon): https://radlex.org/
- DICOM Structured Reporting (PS3.16 templates): https://www.dicomstandard.org/
- ACR BI-RADS Atlas: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/Bi-Rads
- ACR Lung-RADS: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/Lung-Rads
- RSNA Radiology Reporting templates: https://www.rsna.org/practice-tools/data-tools-and-standards/radreport-template-library
- ACR Incidental Findings white papers: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Incidental-Findings
- HL7 FHIR R4 DiagnosticReport (imaging): https://hl7.org/fhir/R4/diagnosticreport.html
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!