Skip to content
Back to skills

Design Frontend Component

ASecurity

Use when creating React/Vue components or adding UI features. Enforces composition patterns and state management best practices.

  • 666 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added February 8, 2026
developmenttypescriptgobashreactvuenodetestingapifrontendperformance

Works with

  • claude code
  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned February 12, 2026

npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill design-frontend-component --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Design Frontend Component?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Design Frontend Component
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/majiayu000-design-frontend-component/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-design-frontend-component)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: design-frontend-component
description: "Use when creating React/Vue components or adding UI features. Enforces composition patterns and state management best practices."
author: "Claude Code Learning Flywheel Team"
allowed-tools: ["Read", "Write", "Edit", "Bash", "Grep", "Glob"]
version: 1.0.0
last_verified: "2026-01-01"
tags: ["frontend", "react", "vue", "components", "ui", "composition"]
related-skills: ["test-driven-workflow", "refactor-legacy-code"]
---

# Skill: Design Frontend Component

## Purpose
Prevent "Prop Drilling Hell" and monolithic components. Enforce composition patterns, proper state management, and the Atomic Design methodology to create maintainable, testable UI components.

## 1. Negative Knowledge (Anti-Patterns)

| Failure Pattern | Context | Why It Fails |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Prop Drilling | Passing data through 5+ layers | Tight coupling, hard to refactor |
| God Components | Files >300 lines with mixed concerns | Untestable, unmaintainable |
| Inline Styles | Hardcoded hex values and dimensions | Inconsistent design, no theming |
| Direct DOM Manipulation | `document.getElementById` in React/Vue | Breaks framework reactivity |
| Business Logic in Components | API calls and validation in render | Hard to test, violates SRP |
| Missing Key Props | List items without unique keys | Performance issues, bugs |
| Mutating Props | Changing props directly | Breaks one-way data flow |
| Excessive State | Everything in component state | Performance issues, complex logic |

## 2. Verified Component Design Procedure

### The Atomic Design Hierarchy

```
ATOMS       → Smallest units (Button, Input, Label)
  ↓
MOLECULES   → Simple groups (SearchBar = Input + Button)
  ↓
ORGANISMS   → Complex sections (Header = Logo + Nav + SearchBar)
  ↓
TEMPLATES   → Page layouts (wireframes)
  ↓
PAGES       → Actual instances with real data
```

### Phase 1: Component Planning

**Before writing code, answer these questions:**

1. **What is the single responsibility of this component?**
   - ❌ "It handles the user profile, settings, and notifications"
   - ✅ "It displays user profile information"

2. **What category is it? (Atom, Molecule, Organism)**
   - Atom: Basic building block (Button, Input, Icon)
   - Molecule: Combination of atoms (Form field with label and error)
   - Organism: Complex UI section (Navigation bar, Product card)

3. **What data does it need?**
   - Props (from parent)
   - Local state (UI-only)
   - Global state (context/store)

4. **What actions can users take?**
   - Events to emit/handle
   - Side effects (API calls, navigation)

### Phase 2: Component Structure

**File organization:**

```
components/
├── atoms/
│   ├── Button/
│   │   ├── Button.tsx
│   │   ├── Button.test.tsx
│   │   ├── Button.stories.tsx  (Storybook)
│   │   └── index.ts
│   └── Input/
│       ├── Input.tsx
│       └── ...
├── molecules/
│   └── SearchBar/
│       ├── SearchBar.tsx
│       └── ...
└── organisms/
    └── Header/
        ├── Header.tsx
        └── ...
```

**Component template:**

```typescript
// components/atoms/Button/Button.tsx
import { ReactNode } from 'react';
import styles from './Button.module.css';

export interface ButtonProps {
  /** The button's content */
  children: ReactNode;
  /** Visual variant */
  variant?: 'primary' | 'secondary' | 'danger';
  /** Size of the button */
  size?: 'small' | 'medium' | 'large';
  /** Disabled state */
  disabled?: boolean;
  /** Click handler */
  onClick?: () => void;
  /** Additional CSS classes */
  className?: string;
}

export function Button({
  children,
  variant = 'primary',
  size = 'medium',
  disabled = false,
  onClick,
  className = '',
}: ButtonProps) {
  return (
    <button
      className={`${styles.button} ${styles[variant]} ${styles[size]} ${className}`}
      disabled={disabled}
      onClick={onClick}
      type="button"
    >
      {children}
    </button>
  );
}
```

### Phase 3: Props Design

**Principles:**

1. **Keep props flat and simple**
   ```typescript
   // ❌ BAD: Nested props
   interface BadProps {
     user: {
       profile: {
         personal: {
           name: string;
         }
       }
     }
   }

   // ✅ GOOD: Flat props
   interface GoodProps {
     userName: string;
     userEmail: string;
     userAvatar: string;
   }
   ```

2. **Use discriminated unions for variants**
   ```typescript
   // ✅ Type-safe variants
   type ButtonProps =
     | { variant: 'link'; href: string }
     | { variant: 'button'; onClick: () => void };
   ```

3. **Provide sensible defaults**
   ```typescript
   function Card({
     variant = 'outlined',  // Default value
     elevation = 1,
     padding = 'medium'
   }: CardProps) {
     // ...
   }
   ```

### Phase 4: State Management

**Decision tree for state location:**

```
Is it server data (API)?
├─ YES → Use React Query / SWR / TanStack Query
└─ NO → Continue

Does more than one component need it?
├─ YES → Use Context / Redux / Zustand
└─ NO → Continue

Is it just UI state (open/closed, hover)?
├─ YES → Use local useState
└─ NO → Reconsider if state is needed
```

**Example: Proper state management**

```typescript
// ❌ BAD: Everything in component state
function UserProfile() {
  const [user, setUser] = useState(null);
  const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false);
  const [error, setError] = useState(null);
  const [isEditing, setIsEditing] = useState(false);  // UI state
  const [theme, setTheme] = useState('light');         // Global state

  useEffect(() => {
    setLoading(true);
    fetch('/api/user')
      .then(res => res.json())
      .then(setUser)
      .catch(setError)
      .finally(() => setLoading(false));
  }, []);

  // ... rest of component
}

// ✅ GOOD: Separate concerns
function UserProfile() {
  // Server state (React Query)
  const { data: user, isLoading, error } = useQuery({
    queryKey: ['user'],
    queryFn: fetchUser
  });

  // Global state (Context)
  const { theme } = useTheme();

  // Local UI state
  const [isEditing, setIsEditing] = useState(false);

  // ... rest of component
}
```

### Phase 5: Composition Over Prop Drilling

**Avoid prop drilling:**

```typescript
// ❌ BAD: Prop drilling
function App() {
  const user = useUser();
  return <Dashboard user={user} />;
}

function Dashboard({ user }) {
  return <Sidebar user={user} />;
}

function Sidebar({ user }) {
  return <UserMenu user={user} />;
}

function UserMenu({ user }) {
  return <div>{user.name}</div>;
}

// ✅ GOOD: Use context for deeply nested data
const UserContext = createContext<User | null>(null);

function App() {
  const user = useUser();
  return (
    <UserContext.Provider value={user}>
      <Dashboard />
    </UserContext.Provider>
  );
}

function UserMenu() {
  const user = useContext(UserContext);
  return <div>{user.name}</div>;
}
```

**Composition patterns:**

```typescript
// ✅ Render props pattern
function DataFetcher({ url, children }) {
  const { data, loading } = useFetch(url);
  return children({ data, loading });
}

<DataFetcher url="/api/users">
  {({ data, loading }) => loading ? <Spinner /> : <UserList users={data} />}
</DataFetcher>

// ✅ Compound components pattern
function Tabs({ children }) {
  const [activeTab, setActiveTab] = useState(0);
  return (
    <TabsContext.Provider value={{ activeTab, setActiveTab }}>
      {children}
    </TabsContext.Provider>
  );
}

Tabs.List = function TabsList({ children }) { /* ... */ };
Tabs.Tab = function Tab({ children, index }) { /* ... */ };
Tabs.Panel = function TabPanel({ children, index }) { /* ... */ };

// Usage
<Tabs>
  <Tabs.List>
    <Tabs.Tab index={0}>Profile</Tabs.Tab>
    <Tabs.Tab index={1}>Settings</Tabs.Tab>
  </Tabs.List>
  <Tabs.Panel index={0}><ProfileContent /></Tabs.Panel>
  <Tabs.Panel index={1}><SettingsContent /></Tabs.Panel>
</Tabs>
```

### Phase 6: Performance Optimization

**Only optimize when needed, but follow these patterns:**

```typescript
// ✅ Memoize expensive calculations
function ProductList({ products, filters }) {
  const filteredProducts = useMemo(() => {
    return products.filter(p => matchesFilters(p, filters));
  }, [products, filters]);

  return <div>{filteredProducts.map(p => <ProductCard key={p.id} {...p} />)}</div>;
}

// ✅ Memoize callbacks passed to children
function ParentComponent() {
  const handleClick = useCallback(() => {
    console.log('Clicked');
  }, []);

  return <ChildComponent onClick={handleClick} />;
}

// ✅ Memoize components that render often
const ExpensiveComponent = memo(function ExpensiveComponent({ data }) {
  // Complex rendering logic
  return <div>{/* ... */}</div>;
});

// ❌ DON'T memoize everything (premature optimization)
const SimpleComponent = memo(function SimpleComponent({ text }) {
  return <div>{text}</div>;  // Too simple to benefit from memo
});
```

## 3. Extended Patterns and Examples

**For detailed code examples, see [reference.md](./reference.md):**

- **Component Design Patterns**: Container/Presenter, Custom Hooks, Error Boundaries
- **Styling Best Practices**: CSS Modules, Styled Components, Design Tokens
- **Testing Patterns**: Behavior-driven testing with Testing Library
- **Advanced Patterns**: HOCs, Slots, Reducers, Accessibility, Performance

**Quick reference summary:**

| Pattern | Use Case | See Reference |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Container/Presenter | Separate logic from UI | reference.md §1 |
| Custom Hooks | Extract reusable logic | reference.md §2 |
| Error Boundaries | Graceful error handling | reference.md §3 |
| CSS Modules | Scoped styling | reference.md §Styling |
| Testing Library | User behavior tests | reference.md §Testing |

## 4. Failed Attempts (Negative Knowledge Evolution)

| Attempt | Context | Learning |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Premature abstraction | Created reusable component after first use | Wait for 3 instances before abstracting |
| Global state for everything | Put all state in Redux store | Use local state by default, global only when needed |
| Index as key in lists | Used array index as React key | Always use unique, stable IDs as keys |
| Fetching data in components | Used useEffect for API calls | Use React Query/SWR for server state |

## 5. Component Design Checklist

Before committing: Single Responsibility ✓ | Size <300 lines ✓ | Props Typed ✓ | No Prop Drilling ✓ | Accessible ✓ | Tested ✓ | Documented ✓ | Styled with tokens ✓ | Unique keys in lists ✓

## 6. Governance
- **Token Budget:** ~390 lines (within 400 recommended limit)
- **Extended Reference:** See reference.md for detailed patterns and examples
- **Dependencies:** React 18+, TypeScript 5+, Testing Library
- **Pattern Origin:** Atomic Design (Brad Frost), React Best Practices
- **Verification Date:** 2026-01-01

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.