Skip to content
Back to skills

Comment Cleanup

ASecurity

Clean up code comments. Use when: improving comment quality, removing redundant comments. Triggers on: 'clean up comments', 'comment cleanup'.

  • 666 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 5 copies
  • 35 views
  • Added February 8, 2026
developmentgoexpressdocumentation

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned February 12, 2026

npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill comment-cleanup --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Comment Cleanup?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Comment Cleanup
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/majiayu000-comment-cleanup/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-comment-cleanup)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: comment-cleanup
description: "Clean up code comments. Use when: improving comment quality, removing redundant comments. Triggers on: 'clean up comments', 'comment cleanup'."
allowed-tools: Read, Edit, Glob, Grep
disable-model-invocation: true
argument-hint: <file_path>
---

# Comment Cleanup

I'll analyze and improve the documentation in the specified file following strategic documentation principles.

## Target File

$ARGUMENTS

## Documentation Philosophy

### Core Principles

1. **Self-documenting code first** - Improve naming and structure before adding comments
2. **Comments capture design intent** - Document WHY, not WHAT (when WHAT is obvious)
3. **Reduce cognitive load** - Make implicit knowledge explicit
4. **Eliminate redundancy** - Never restate what code already makes clear

### What Makes GOOD Comments

- **Design decisions** - Why this approach over alternatives
- **Non-obvious behavior** - Complex logic that isn't immediately clear
- **Interface contracts** - What a function/module does, parameters, returns
- **Important context** - Background information needed to understand
- **Gotchas and edge cases** - Subtle behaviors that could cause issues
- **Dependencies** - How components relate to each other

### What to AVOID

- Redundant comments restating obvious code
- Comments duplicating well-named variables/functions
- Implementation details that are self-evident
- Comments that would become outdated easily

## Analysis Process

1. **Read the file** to understand its purpose and structure
2. **Identify naming improvements** that could make code more self-documenting
3. **Find complex logic** that needs explanation
4. **Locate design decisions** that should be documented
5. **Remove harmful comments** that add noise or are outdated
6. **Add strategic comments** where they reduce cognitive load

## Execution

I will:

1. First read and analyze the target file
2. Suggest and apply naming improvements if needed
3. Remove redundant or misleading comments
4. Add comments only where they:
   - Explain non-obvious behavior
   - Document design decisions
   - Clarify complex algorithms
   - Provide essential interface documentation
5. Ensure all changes follow the "campsite rule" - leave code cleaner than found

The goal is **minimal, high-value documentation** - make code so clear it needs few comments, then add comments only where they capture essential information not expressible in code.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.