Back to skills
SKILL.md
Coderabbit Reviewer
ASecurityIntegrates CodeRabbit for automated PR code review. Use after PR creation to get AI-powered review feedback before human review.
- 666 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 6 views
- Added February 8, 2026
Security analysis
100/100npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill coderabbit-reviewer --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Coderabbit Reviewer?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-coderabbit-reviewer)---
name: coderabbit-reviewer
description: Integrates CodeRabbit for automated PR code review. Use after PR creation to get AI-powered review feedback before human review.
---
# CodeRabbit Reviewer
Processes CodeRabbit automated review feedback and helps address issues. Assumes CodeRabbit is already installed on the repository.
## Prerequisites
- PR created and pushed to GitHub
- CodeRabbit installed on Comfy-Org/ComfyUI_frontend (it is)
## Workflow
### 1. Verify PR Exists
```bash
PR_NUMBER=$(gh pr view --json number -q '.number')
echo "PR #$PR_NUMBER"
```
### 2. Wait for CodeRabbit Review
CodeRabbit reviews automatically on PR creation. Check for review comment:
```bash
# Check for CodeRabbit review comment
gh pr view $PR_NUMBER --json comments --jq '.comments[] | select(.author.login == "coderabbitai")'
```
Typical wait time: 2-5 minutes for small PRs.
To manually trigger a re-review:
```bash
gh pr comment $PR_NUMBER --body "@coderabbitai review"
```
### 3. Parse Review Feedback
Extract actionable items from CodeRabbit's review:
```markdown
## CodeRabbit Review Summary
### Critical Issues
- [ ] {file:line} - {issue description}
### Suggestions
- [ ] {file:line} - {suggestion}
### Nitpicks
- [ ] {file:line} - {minor improvement}
```
### 4. Categorize by Severity
| Category | Action Required | Auto-fixable |
| ---------- | --------------------- | ------------ |
| Critical | Must fix before merge | Sometimes |
| Suggestion | Should consider | Often |
| Nitpick | Nice to have | Usually |
### 5. Present to User
```
CodeRabbit Review Complete
## Summary
- Critical: 2 issues
- Suggestions: 5 items
- Nitpicks: 3 items
## Critical Issues (must fix)
1. src/components/Feature.vue:45 - Potential null reference
2. src/stores/data.ts:23 - Missing error handling
Options:
1. Auto-fix critical issues
2. Show all feedback details
3. Dismiss and proceed to human review
Your choice:
```
### 6. Fix Issues
For fixable issues, apply changes directly or dispatch subagents:
```
Fix CodeRabbit critical issue:
File: {file}
Line: {line}
Issue: {description}
Suggestion: {CodeRabbit's suggestion}
Apply fix and verify with `pnpm typecheck`.
```
### 7. Request Re-Review
After fixes:
```bash
git add -A
git commit -m "fix: address CodeRabbit review feedback"
git push
# Request re-review
gh pr comment $PR_NUMBER --body "@coderabbitai review"
```
### 8. Update Status
```bash
jq '.coderabbitReview = {
"reviewedAt": now,
"critical": N,
"suggestions": N,
"fixed": N
}' "$RUN_DIR/status.json" > tmp && mv tmp "$RUN_DIR/status.json"
```
## CodeRabbit Commands
Trigger via PR comments:
| Command | Purpose |
| ----------------------- | --------------------- |
| `@coderabbitai review` | Full review |
| `@coderabbitai summary` | Generate PR summary |
| `@coderabbitai resolve` | Mark threads resolved |
## Integration with Pipeline
**Before:** pr-creator (PR exists)
**After:** review-orchestrator (human review)
Recommended flow:
1. PR created → CodeRabbit auto-reviews
2. Fix critical issues
3. Human review with CodeRabbit context
4. Merge
Attribution
Comments
Loading comments…
Newsletter
Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.