'Deep analysis of a GitHub repository for tool spotlight inclusion in
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill analyze-github-repo --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Analyze Github Repo?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-analyze-github-repo)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: analyze-github-repo
description: 'Deep analysis of a GitHub repository for tool spotlight inclusion in
news digests. Evaluates the project''s purpose, quality, popularity trajectory,
and usefulness for AI practitioners.
'
license: MIT
compatibility: Requires OpenAI-compatible LLM API access and GitHub API access
metadata:
domain: news
category: diagnostic
requires-approval: false
confidence: 0.8
mcp-servers: []
input:
- name: repo
type: GithubRepo
description: Repository metadata from fetch-github-trending
- name: include_readme
type: bool
default: true
description: Whether to fetch and analyze the README for deeper insights
output:
- name: analysis
type: RepoAnalysis
description: Comprehensive repository analysis with summary and recommendations
- name: spotlight_worthy
type: bool
description: Whether repo deserves a featured tool spotlight
- name: spotlight_summary
type: str
description: Ready-to-use summary for digest if spotlight-worthy
---
# Analyze GitHub Repo
Evaluate a GitHub repository for potential inclusion as a tool spotlight in the news digest.
## When to Use
- Evaluating trending repos for digest tool spotlight section
- Assessing quality and usefulness of new AI tools
- Creating tool recommendation summaries
- Keywords: github, repository, tool, library, spotlight, analysis
## Prerequisites
- Repository metadata available (from fetch-github-trending)
- Network access to GitHub for README fetch (optional)
## Input Schema
```json
{
"repo": {
"full_name": "owner/repo-name",
"name": "repo-name",
"description": "Repository description",
"url": "https://github.com/owner/repo-name",
"stars": 5000,
"forks": 300,
"language": "Python",
"topics": ["llm", "machine-learning"],
"created_at": "2025-06-15",
"pushed_at": "2026-01-26",
"open_issues": 42
},
"include_readme": true
}
```
## Actions
### Step 1: Assess Project Category
Classify the repository:
- **Framework**: Full framework for building applications (e.g., LangChain)
- **Library**: Focused library for specific task (e.g., sentence-transformers)
- **Tool**: Standalone tool or CLI (e.g., ollama)
- **Model**: Model weights or implementation (e.g., Llama)
- **Dataset**: Dataset or data processing
- **Application**: Complete application (e.g., chat UI)
- **Tutorial/Demo**: Educational content
### Step 2: Evaluate Quality Signals
Assess quality based on:
1. **Documentation**: Is there a README? Is it comprehensive?
2. **Activity**: Recent commits? Active maintenance?
3. **Community**: Issues being addressed? PRs reviewed?
4. **Code Quality**: Based on language, structure visible from description
5. **Dependencies**: Are dependencies reasonable and maintained?
### Step 3: Analyze Popularity Trajectory
Calculate growth indicators:
- **Star velocity**: Stars gained recently (estimate from trending status)
- **Fork ratio**: Forks/Stars indicates adoption
- **Issue health**: Open issues vs total activity
- **Maturity**: Age vs popularity
### Step 4: Determine Use Cases
Identify who would benefit:
- **Researchers**: Academic use cases
- **Practitioners**: Production deployment
- **Hobbyists**: Personal projects
- **Enterprise**: Business applications
### Step 5: Identify Differentiators
What makes this repo special:
- **Novel approach**: Does something new
- **Better performance**: Faster/cheaper than alternatives
- **Ease of use**: Lower barrier than alternatives
- **Integration**: Works well with popular tools
- **Active community**: Good support and updates
### Step 6: Fetch and Analyze README (if enabled)
If `include_readme` is true:
1. Fetch README.md from GitHub
2. Extract:
- Installation instructions
- Quick start example
- Feature list
- Comparison with alternatives (if mentioned)
### Step 7: Generate Spotlight Summary
If spotlight-worthy, create a 2-3 sentence summary:
1. What the tool does
2. Why it's noteworthy now
3. Who should check it out
### Step 8: Determine Spotlight Worthiness
A repo is spotlight-worthy if:
- Stars >= 1000 OR growing rapidly (>500 in last week)
- Active maintenance (pushed within 7 days)
- Clear, useful purpose for AI practitioners
- Good documentation
- NOT primarily educational/tutorial content
## Output Schema
```json
{
"analysis": {
"full_name": "owner/repo-name",
"category": "library",
"quality_scores": {
"documentation": 8,
"activity": 9,
"community": 7,
"overall": 8
},
"popularity_metrics": {
"star_count": 5000,
"fork_count": 300,
"fork_ratio": 0.06,
"estimated_weekly_stars": 500,
"growth_status": "rapid"
},
"use_cases": ["practitioners", "enterprise"],
"differentiators": [
"2x faster than alternative X",
"Simple API with good defaults",
"Active Discord community"
],
"target_audience": "ML engineers building LLM applications",
"maturity": "stable",
"risk_factors": [
"Single maintainer",
"No enterprise support"
]
},
"spotlight_worthy": true,
"spotlight_summary": "**repo-name** is a new Python library that makes LLM inference 2x faster with a simple API. It's gained 500 stars this week as developers discover its drop-in compatibility with popular frameworks. Worth checking out if you're running inference workloads."
}
```
## Success Criteria
- [ ] Category correctly identified
- [ ] Quality assessment reasonable
- [ ] Spotlight decision justified by metrics
- [ ] Summary is concise and informative
- [ ] Target audience identified
## Failure Handling
| Error Type | Handling Strategy |
|------------|-------------------|
| README fetch fails | Continue without README analysis |
| Minimal description | Use topics and repo name for analysis |
| Private/deleted repo | Return error with explanation |
## Examples
### Example 1: High-Quality New Library
**Input:**
```json
{
"repo": {
"full_name": "example/llm-accelerator",
"name": "llm-accelerator",
"description": "Fast LLM inference with automatic batching and caching",
"url": "https://github.com/example/llm-accelerator",
"stars": 3500,
"forks": 180,
"language": "Python",
"topics": ["llm", "inference", "optimization"],
"created_at": "2025-11-01",
"pushed_at": "2026-01-26",
"open_issues": 25
},
"include_readme": true
}
```
**Output:**
```json
{
"analysis": {
"full_name": "example/llm-accelerator",
"category": "library",
"quality_scores": {
"documentation": 9,
"activity": 10,
"community": 8,
"overall": 9
},
"popularity_metrics": {
"star_count": 3500,
"fork_count": 180,
"fork_ratio": 0.05,
"estimated_weekly_stars": 400,
"growth_status": "rapid"
},
"use_cases": ["practitioners", "enterprise"],
"differentiators": [
"Automatic request batching",
"Built-in caching layer",
"Drop-in replacement for common APIs"
],
"target_audience": "ML engineers and backend developers",
"maturity": "growing",
"risk_factors": []
},
"spotlight_worthy": true,
"spotlight_summary": "**llm-accelerator** automatically batches and caches LLM requests, cutting inference costs without code changes. With 3,500 stars and 400 gained this week, it's becoming a go-to for teams looking to optimize their LLM deployments. Check it out if you're serving LLM requests at scale."
}
```
### Example 2: Tutorial Repository (Not Spotlight Worthy)
**Input:**
```json
{
"repo": {
"full_name": "someone/llm-tutorial",
"name": "llm-tutorial",
"description": "Learn how to build with LLMs - step by step tutorials",
"url": "https://github.com/someone/llm-tutorial",
"stars": 800,
"forks": 150,
"language": "Jupyter Notebook",
"topics": ["tutorial", "llm", "learning"],
"created_at": "2025-08-01",
"pushed_at": "2026-01-20",
"open_issues": 5
},
"include_readme": false
}
```
**Output:**
```json
{
"analysis": {
"full_name": "someone/llm-tutorial",
"category": "tutorial",
"quality_scores": {
"documentation": 7,
"activity": 6,
"community": 5,
"overall": 6
},
"popularity_metrics": {
"star_count": 800,
"fork_count": 150,
"fork_ratio": 0.19,
"estimated_weekly_stars": 20,
"growth_status": "steady"
},
"use_cases": ["hobbyists", "researchers"],
"differentiators": [
"Comprehensive tutorial collection"
],
"target_audience": "Beginners learning LLM development",
"maturity": "stable",
"risk_factors": [
"Educational content, not production tool"
]
},
"spotlight_worthy": false,
"spotlight_summary": ""
}
```
### Example 3: Popular But Stale Repository
**Input:**
```json
{
"repo": {
"full_name": "old/legacy-tool",
"name": "legacy-tool",
"description": "ML toolkit from 2023",
"url": "https://github.com/old/legacy-tool",
"stars": 15000,
"forks": 2000,
"language": "Python",
"topics": ["machine-learning"],
"created_at": "2022-01-01",
"pushed_at": "2025-06-01",
"open_issues": 500
},
"include_readme": false
}
```
**Output:**
```json
{
"analysis": {
"full_name": "old/legacy-tool",
"category": "framework",
"quality_scores": {
"documentation": 7,
"activity": 2,
"community": 3,
"overall": 4
},
"popularity_metrics": {
"star_count": 15000,
"fork_count": 2000,
"fork_ratio": 0.13,
"estimated_weekly_stars": 5,
"growth_status": "declining"
},
"use_cases": ["practitioners"],
"differentiators": [],
"target_audience": "Legacy users",
"maturity": "legacy",
"risk_factors": [
"No recent updates",
"High open issue count",
"Likely abandoned"
]
},
"spotlight_worthy": false,
"spotlight_summary": ""
}
```
## Related Skills
- [fetch-github-trending](../../collection/fetch-github-trending/SKILL.md) - Fetch repos for analysis
- [compose-executive-digest](../../action/compose-executive-digest/SKILL.md) - Include in tool spotlight
## Changelog
| Version | Date | Changes |
|---------|------|---------|
| 1.0.0 | 2026-01-27 | Initial version |
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!