Quality assurance review for implementations. Use when reviewing code quality, checking implementation standards, performing QA cycles, or validating feature quality.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill ac-qa-reviewer --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ac Qa Reviewer?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-ac-qa-reviewer-claude-skill-registry)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ac-qa-reviewer
description: Quality assurance review for implementations. Use when reviewing code quality, checking implementation standards, performing QA cycles, or validating feature quality.
---
# AC QA Reviewer
Perform quality assurance reviews on feature implementations.
## Purpose
Reviews completed features for code quality, adherence to standards, security issues, and best practices before marking features as complete.
## Quick Start
```python
from scripts.qa_reviewer import QAReviewer
reviewer = QAReviewer(project_dir)
result = await reviewer.review_feature("auth-001")
```
## Review Dimensions
### Code Quality
- Clean code principles
- DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself)
- SOLID principles
- Code complexity metrics
### Security
- Input validation
- SQL injection prevention
- XSS prevention
- Secure authentication
### Performance
- Algorithm efficiency
- Database query optimization
- Memory usage
- Caching opportunities
### Testing
- Test coverage
- Test quality
- Edge case coverage
- Integration tests
### Documentation
- Code comments
- API documentation
- README updates
- Type annotations
## Review Result
```json
{
"feature_id": "auth-001",
"approved": true,
"score": 85,
"dimensions": {
"code_quality": {"score": 90, "issues": []},
"security": {"score": 85, "issues": ["Consider rate limiting"]},
"performance": {"score": 80, "issues": []},
"testing": {"score": 88, "issues": []},
"documentation": {"score": 82, "issues": ["Add docstring to validate_token"]}
},
"blocking_issues": [],
"suggestions": [
"Consider extracting authentication middleware",
"Add rate limiting for login endpoint"
],
"auto_fixable": ["missing_docstring"]
}
```
## QA Workflow
```
1. SCAN → Static analysis of changed files
2. ANALYZE → Check against quality rules
3. SECURITY → Security-specific checks
4. REVIEW → Contextual code review
5. REPORT → Generate review report
6. FIX → Auto-fix simple issues (optional)
7. APPROVE → Mark as QA passed or request changes
```
## Quality Gates
```yaml
gates:
minimum_score: 70
blocking_categories:
- security_critical
- test_failures
required_checks:
- linting_passes
- type_checks_pass
- tests_pass
- coverage_minimum
```
## Auto-Fix Capabilities
The reviewer can automatically fix:
- Missing type hints
- Formatting issues
- Simple code style violations
- Missing docstrings (basic)
## Integration
- Input: Completed features from `ac-task-executor`
- Uses: `ac-code-validator` for static analysis
- Reports to: `ac-state-tracker`
## API Reference
See `scripts/qa_reviewer.py` for full implementation.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!