Use when implementing causal inference methods in ML.
Scanned 9/10/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add LoopyLuci/Skills --skill causal-inference-ml --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Causal Inference Ml?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/loopyluci-causal-inference-ml)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: causal-inference-ml
description: "Use when implementing causal inference methods in ML."
version: 1.0.0
author: Hermes Agent
license: MIT
metadata:
hermes:
tags: [causal-inference, do-calculus, treatment-effects, DAG, counterfactual]
related_skills: [ab-testing-experimentation, deep-reinforcement-learning, ml-pipeline-design, agent-reasoning-patterns]
---
# Causal Inference in ML
Applying causal inference methods to machine learning — from causal graphs through treatment effect estimation, counterfactual reasoning, and decision-making.
## When to Use
- Determining whether X causes Y (not just correlates)
- Estimating treatment effects from observational data
- Removing confounding bias from ML models
- Answering "what if" counterfactual questions
## Causal Concepts
```python
CAUSAL_CONCEPTS = {
'association': 'P(Y|X) — statistical correlation',
'intervention': 'P(Y|do(X)) — causal effect of intervening',
'counterfactual': 'P(Y_{X=x} | X=x\') — what if X had been different',
}
```
## Causal Graph (DAG)
```python
class CausalGraph:
def __init__(self):
self.nodes = set(); self.edges = []
def add_edge(self, cause: str, effect: str):
self.nodes.update([cause, effect]); self.edges.append((cause, effect))
def get_confounders(self, x: str, y: str) -> list:
x_parents = set(p for p, c in self.edges if c == x)
y_parents = set(p for p, c in self.edges if c == y)
return list(x_parents & y_parents)
```
## Treatment Effect Estimation
```python
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
def propensity_score_matching(treatment, outcome, features):
ps_model = LogisticRegression().fit(features, treatment)
propensity = ps_model.predict_proba(features)[:, 1]
treated = treatment == 1; control = treatment == 0
effects = []
for i in np.where(treated)[0]:
nearest = np.where(control)[0][np.argmin(np.abs(propensity[control] - propensity[i]))]
effects.append(outcome[i] - outcome[nearest])
return {'ate': np.mean(effects), 'matched_pairs': len(effects)}
```
## Common Pitfalls
1. **Correlation ≠ causation** — always consider confounders
2. **Conditioning on colliders** — opens spurious paths
3. **Selection bias** — non-random treatment assignment; use matching
4. **Hidden confounders** — unmeasured variables bias estimates
## Verification Checklist
- [ ] Causal DAG drawn and reviewed
- [ ] Confounders identified and adjusted for
- [ ] Backdoor criterion satisfied
- [ ] Sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding
## See Also
- ab-testing-experimentation — randomized experiments
- deep-reinforcement-learning — causal effects in RL
- ml-pipeline-design — causal inference in pipelines

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!