Skip to content
Back to skills

Feature Benefits

ASecurity

Systematic codebase scanning for features and evidence-based feature-to-benefit translation. Extracts what a project does from its code and translates it into what users gain — generates features and benefits sections, "Why [Project]?" content, and feature audit reports. Use when writing a features table for a README, extracting features from code, auditing feature coverage, or answering "why should someone use this project?".

  • 8 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added May 26, 2026
developmentjavascripttypescriptpythonrustgojavanodedockertestinggit

Works with

  • claude code
  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add littlebearapps/pitchdocs --skill feature-benefits --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Feature Benefits?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Feature Benefits
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/littlebearapps-feature-benefits/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/littlebearapps-feature-benefits)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: feature-benefits
description: Systematic codebase scanning for features and evidence-based feature-to-benefit translation. Extracts what a project does from its code and translates it into what users gain — generates features and benefits sections, "Why [Project]?" content, and feature audit reports. Use when writing a features table for a README, extracting features from code, auditing feature coverage, or answering "why should someone use this project?".
version: "1.0.0"
---

# Feature-Benefits Extraction

Scan a codebase systematically, extract concrete features with evidence, classify by impact, and translate into benefit-driven language for documentation.

## 7-Step Feature Extraction Workflow

### Step 1: Detect Project Type

Read the primary manifest to understand the ecosystem:

| File | Ecosystem | Key Fields |
|------|-----------|------------|
| `package.json` | Node.js / JavaScript / TypeScript | `dependencies`, `scripts`, `bin`, `exports`, `type` |
| `pyproject.toml` | Python | `[project.dependencies]`, `[project.scripts]`, `[tool.*]` |
| `Cargo.toml` | Rust | `[dependencies]`, `[features]`, `[[bin]]` |
| `go.mod` | Go | `require`, module path |
| `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` | Claude Code Plugin | `skills`, `commands`, `agents`, `hooks` |

Also check: `Makefile`, `Dockerfile`, `docker-compose.yml`, `.github/workflows/`, `wrangler.toml` for deployment signals.

### Step 2: Scan Signal Categories

Scan the 10 signal categories: CLI Commands, Public API, Configuration, Integrations, Performance, Security, TypeScript/DX, Testing, Middleware/Plugins, Documentation.

For each category, check file patterns, read matching files, and record what you find. For detailed file patterns and scan lists per category, load `SKILL-signals.md` from this skill directory.

### Step 3: Extract Concrete Features with Evidence

For each signal found, create a feature entry:

```
Feature: [What it does — concrete, specific]
Evidence: [File path, function name, or config that proves it]
Category: [Signal category from Step 2]
```

**Rules:**
- Every feature must have a file path or function as evidence
- No speculative features — if you can't point to code, it's not a feature
- Be specific: "Zero-config TypeScript support" not "Good developer experience"

### Step 3.5: Map to Jobs-to-be-Done (Hero features only)

For Hero features, frame the job: `When I am [situation], I want [capability], so I can [outcome]`. Classify as Functional, Emotional, or Social. Skip JTBD for Core/Supporting tiers and projects with fewer than 5 features. For full JTBD guidance, load `SKILL-signals.md`.

### Step 3.6: Persona Inference

Infer 1–2 target personas from code signals (integration surface, execution model, entry points, deploy artifacts). Map to archetypes: Solo builder, Team lead, Platform/ops engineer, Power user/automator, Compliance-aware org. Default to "Solo builder" if ambiguous. For the full persona inference table, load `SKILL-signals.md`.

### Step 4: User Benefits (the "Why?" Layer)

User benefits answer **"Why should I care?"** — the real-world reasons someone would choose this project.

**Two paths available — both produce the same output format:**

#### Path A: Auto-Scan (default)

Synthesise outcome-first benefits from Hero features + JTBD + persona:
1. Apply the **signal gate**: Standard (workflow benefits) by default; Elevated (experiential) only with mobile/async/remote/voice signals in code
2. Generate 3–7 draft benefits, tag claim strength: Strong (code directly enables), Medium (reasonable inference), Weak (discard)
3. Ship only Strong + Medium benefits

#### Path B: Conversational ("Talk it out")

Use 4 interactive questions to surface authentic use cases, then enrich with code evidence. For the full prompt sequence, load `SKILL-signals.md`.

#### Output Format

```
**[Bold user outcome]** — [mechanism/how it works]. [Constraint if needed].
```

Each benefit requires: a specific context, an enabling mechanism, and an evidence pointer.

### Step 5: Classify by Impact Tier

| Tier | Count | Criteria | README Placement |
|------|-------|----------|-----------------|
| **Hero** | 1–3 | Primary differentiators — why someone chooses THIS over alternatives | One-liner, Why section, first in features |
| **Core** | 4–8 | Expected by the target audience — missing these would be a deal-breaker | Features table, quick start examples |
| **Supporting** | 9+ | Nice-to-have — adds polish but isn't the reason someone adopts | Mentioned briefly or linked to docs |

### Step 6: Output Structured Feature Inventory

Output as a Markdown table with Feature, Evidence, Benefit Category, and optional JTBD columns, grouped by tier (Hero, Core, Supporting). Or use emoji+bold+em-dash bullets for direct README use.

---

## Feature-to-Benefit Translation Framework

### The Translation Pattern

```
[Technical feature] so you can [user outcome] — [evidence]
```

### 5 Benefit Categories

Use at least 3 different categories across your features table:

| Category | Pattern | Example Benefit |
|----------|---------|----------------|
| **Time saved** | "Do X in Y instead of Z" | "Generate a full README in under a minute — not an afternoon" |
| **Confidence gained** | "Know that X because Y" | "Every benefit traces to actual code — no marketing fluff" |
| **Pain avoided** | "Never worry about X" | "Never ship a repo with missing docs again" |
| **Capability unlocked** | "Now you can X" | "Scan any codebase and extract its selling points automatically" |
| **Cost reduced** | "Save X by Y" | "One plugin replaces five separate documentation tools" |

### Anti-Patterns

- **No "simple" or "easy"** — show simplicity through a short code example
- **No "powerful" without evidence** — what specifically makes it powerful?
- **No speculative benefits** — "could save you hours" requires evidence
- **No feature-as-benefit** — "Has caching" is a feature; "Responses in <50ms after first request" is the benefit
- **No benefit without context** — every user benefit needs a specific situation
- **No benefit without mechanism** — every user benefit needs an enabling mechanism
- **No ungrounded lifestyle claims** — elevated signal gate only when code proves the mechanism

For the full translation table by signal category, badge mapping, and common patterns library, load `SKILL-signals.md`.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL-signals.md8.4 KB
  • SKILL.md6.3 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.