Urban Planning Risk Assessment

---
name: urban-planning-risk-assessment
description: |
  Identify, score and control the risks in work for developers, councils and communities in planning departments and consultancy offices.
  TRIGGERS - Use when a town planner needs a risk assessment for developers, councils and communities in planning departments and consultancy offices.
category: Urban Planning
license: MIT
version: 1.0
---
# Risk Assessment — Urban Planning

Identify, score and control the risks in work for developers, councils and communities in planning departments and consultancy offices. The deliverable is a risk assessment with likelihood/impact scores, controls and owners.
This skill is written for a town planner working with developers, councils and communities in planning departments and consultancy offices.

## When to use
- You are a town planner preparing, delivering or reviewing this part of your work in planning departments and consultancy offices.
- You need a defensible, repeatable approach that produces a risk assessment with likelihood/impact scores, controls and owners.
- A colleague, auditor or client asks how this was done and what evidence supports it.

## Key Concepts
| Term | Meaning |
|------|---------|
| Local plan | the statutory document guiding development in an area |
| Determination | the formal decision on a planning application |
| Material consideration | a planning factor legally relevant to a decision |

## Workflow
1. **Step 1** - Map the activity step by step and list what could go wrong at each stage for developers, councils and communities and staff
2. **Step 2** - Score each risk for likelihood and impact, giving special weight to missed consultation deadlines
3. **Step 3** - For every high risk, define a control that removes, reduces or contains it, using GIS mapping where relevant
4. **Step 4** - Record the assessment in planning applications, assign an owner to each control, and set a review date
5. **Step 5** - Brief everyone involved before work starts; stop and reassess if conditions in planning departments and consultancy offices change

## Profession-Specific Components
| Component | Details for Urban Planning |
|-----------|-------------------------------|
| Core documentation | planning applications; policy documents; site appraisals; consultation reports |
| Core tools & equipment | GIS mapping; planning portals; modelling software; consultation platforms |
| People involved | developers, councils and communities; the town planner; colleagues and other services in planning departments and consultancy offices |
| Primary record | planning applications — keep it current, dated and attributable |

## Output Format
**Context:** [Situation in planning departments and consultancy offices] | **Objective:** [What this must achieve] | **Audience:** [developers, councils and communities and other stakeholders]

The finished output is a risk assessment with likelihood/impact scores, controls and owners, structured as:
1. Summary of position and evidence
2. Detail, following the workflow above
3. Decisions, actions, owners and dates
4. Review point and escalation route

### Action Plan
1. **Immediate:** Confirm scope, consent and the evidence available in planning applications.
2. **Short-term:** Complete the workflow steps and record outcomes against application determination times.
3. **Medium-term:** Review results, close actions, and update local procedures in planning departments and consultancy offices.

## Success Metrics
| Metric | Target | Method |
|--------|--------|--------|
| application determination times | Agree a local target and track the trend | Measured from planning applications and reviewed on a set cycle |
| appeal outcomes | Agree a local target and track the trend | Measured from planning applications and reviewed on a set cycle |
| consultation engagement | Agree a local target and track the trend | Measured from planning applications and reviewed on a set cycle |
| policy adoption | Agree a local target and track the trend | Measured from planning applications and reviewed on a set cycle |

## Guardrails & Quality Checks
- Never let this happen: missed consultation deadlines.
- Never let this happen: policy conflicts.
- Never let this happen: appeals lost on process.
- Work only within the competence and authority of a town planner; escalate or refer anything beyond it.
- Record facts and observations, not speculation, and keep records confidential to planning departments and consultancy offices's rules.
- Verify names, dates, figures and measurements twice before anything is issued or signed off.
- Use only real, verified information from the case in hand — never invent results, credentials or evidence.

## Example (illustrative)
A town planner in planning departments and consultancy offices applies this workflow for developers, councils and communities: they open
planning applications, work through the five steps using GIS mapping, and close by recording
the outcome against application determination times and agreeing the next review date. (Illustrative example only —
replace with the real details of the case in hand.)