Skip to content
Back to skills

Cpp Coding Standards

ASecurity

C++ coding standards based on the C++ Core Guidelines (isocpp.github.io). Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring C++ code to enforce modern, safe, and idiomatic practices.

  • 4 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 6 views
  • Added June 4, 2026
code-qualitygoc++expressrefactoringgitperformance

Works with

  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned June 4, 2026

npx -y skills add lidge-jun/cli-jaw-skills --skill cpp-coding-standards --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Cpp Coding Standards?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Cpp Coding Standards
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/lidge-jun-cpp-coding-standards/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/lidge-jun-cpp-coding-standards)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: cpp-coding-standards
description: C++ coding standards based on the C++ Core Guidelines (isocpp.github.io). Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring C++ code to enforce modern, safe, and idiomatic practices.
---

# C++ Coding Standards (C++ Core Guidelines)

Coding standards for modern C++ (C++17/20/23) derived from the [C++ Core Guidelines](https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines). Enforces type safety, resource safety, immutability, and clarity.

## When to Use

- Writing new C++ code (classes, functions, templates)
- Reviewing or refactoring existing C++ code
- Making architectural decisions in C++ projects
- Enforcing consistent style across a C++ codebase
- Choosing between language features (e.g., `enum` vs `enum class`, raw pointer vs smart pointer)

### When Not to Use

- Non-C++ projects
- Legacy C codebases that cannot adopt modern C++ features
- Embedded/bare-metal contexts where specific guidelines conflict with hardware constraints (adapt selectively)

## Cross-Cutting Principles

1. **RAII everywhere** (P.8, R.1, E.6, CP.20): Bind resource lifetime to object lifetime
2. **Immutability by default** (P.10, Con.1-5, ES.25): Start with `const`/`constexpr`; mutability is the exception
3. **Type safety** (P.4, I.4, ES.46-49, Enum.3): Use the type system to prevent errors at compile time
4. **Express intent** (P.3, F.1, NL.1-2, T.10): Names, types, and concepts should communicate purpose
5. **Minimize complexity** (F.2-3, ES.5, Per.4-5): Simple code is correct code
6. **Value semantics over pointer semantics** (C.10, R.3-5, F.20, CP.31): Prefer returning by value and scoped objects

## Philosophy & Interfaces (P.*, I.*)

| Rule | Summary |
|------|---------|
| **P.1** | Express ideas directly in code |
| **P.3** | Express intent |
| **P.4** | Ideally, a program should be statically type safe |
| **P.5** | Prefer compile-time checking to run-time checking |
| **P.8** | Avoid leaking any resources |
| **P.10** | Prefer immutable data to mutable data |
| **I.1** | Make interfaces explicit |
| **I.2** | Avoid non-const global variables |
| **I.4** | Make interfaces precisely and strongly typed |
| **I.11** | Transfer ownership via smart pointers, not raw pointers or references |
| **I.23** | Keep the number of function arguments low |

See `references/code-examples.md` § Philosophy & Interfaces for examples.

## Functions (F.*)

| Rule | Summary |
|------|---------|
| **F.1** | Package meaningful operations as carefully named functions |
| **F.2** | A function should perform a single logical operation |
| **F.3** | Keep functions short and simple |
| **F.4** | If a function might be evaluated at compile time, declare it `constexpr` |
| **F.6** | If your function must not throw, declare it `noexcept` |
| **F.8** | Prefer pure functions |
| **F.16** | For "in" parameters, pass cheaply-copied types by value and others by `const&` |
| **F.20** | For "out" values, prefer return values to output parameters |
| **F.21** | To return multiple "out" values, prefer returning a struct |
| **F.43** | Avoid returning a pointer or reference to a local object |

Anti-patterns to avoid:
- Returning `T&&` from functions (F.45)
- Using `va_arg` / C-style variadics (F.55)
- Capturing by reference in lambdas passed to other threads (F.53)
- Returning `const T` which inhibits move semantics (F.49)

See `references/code-examples.md` § Functions for parameter passing and constexpr examples.

## Classes & Class Hierarchies (C.*)

| Rule | Summary |
|------|---------|
| **C.2** | Use `class` if invariant exists; `struct` if data members vary independently |
| **C.9** | Minimize exposure of members |
| **C.20** | If you can avoid defining default operations, do (Rule of Zero) |
| **C.21** | If you define or `=delete` any copy/move/destructor, handle them all (Rule of Five) |
| **C.35** | Base class destructor: public virtual or protected non-virtual |
| **C.41** | A constructor should create a fully initialized object |
| **C.46** | Declare single-argument constructors `explicit` |
| **C.67** | A polymorphic class should suppress public copy/move |
| **C.128** | Virtual functions: specify exactly one of `virtual`, `override`, or `final` |

Anti-patterns to avoid:
- Calling virtual functions in constructors/destructors (C.82)
- Using `memset`/`memcpy` on non-trivial types (C.90)
- Providing different default arguments for virtual function and overrider (C.140)
- Making data members `const` or references, which suppresses move/copy (C.12)

See `references/code-examples.md` § Classes for Rule of Zero, Rule of Five, and class hierarchy examples.

## Resource Management (R.*)

| Rule | Summary |
|------|---------|
| **R.1** | Manage resources automatically using RAII |
| **R.3** | A raw pointer (`T*`) is non-owning |
| **R.5** | Prefer scoped objects; avoid heap-allocating unnecessarily |
| **R.10** | Avoid `malloc()`/`free()` |
| **R.11** | Avoid calling `new` and `delete` explicitly |
| **R.20** | Use `unique_ptr` or `shared_ptr` to represent ownership |
| **R.21** | Prefer `unique_ptr` over `shared_ptr` unless sharing ownership |
| **R.22** | Use `make_shared()` to make `shared_ptr`s |

Anti-patterns to avoid:
- Naked `new`/`delete` (R.11)
- `malloc()`/`free()` in C++ code (R.10)
- Multiple resource allocations in a single expression (R.13 — exception safety hazard)
- `shared_ptr` where `unique_ptr` suffices (R.21)

See `references/code-examples.md` § Resource Management for smart pointer and RAII examples.

## Expressions & Statements (ES.*)

| Rule | Summary |
|------|---------|
| **ES.5** | Keep scopes small |
| **ES.20** | Always initialize an object |
| **ES.23** | Prefer `{}` initializer syntax |
| **ES.25** | Declare objects `const` or `constexpr` unless modification is intended |
| **ES.28** | Use lambdas for complex initialization of `const` variables |
| **ES.45** | Avoid magic constants; use symbolic constants |
| **ES.46** | Avoid narrowing/lossy arithmetic conversions |
| **ES.47** | Use `nullptr` rather than `0` or `NULL` |
| **ES.48** | Avoid casts |
| **ES.50** | Avoid casting away `const` |

Anti-patterns to avoid:
- Uninitialized variables (ES.20)
- Using `0` or `NULL` as pointer (ES.47 — use `nullptr`)
- C-style casts (ES.48 — use `static_cast`, `const_cast`, etc.)
- Casting away `const` (ES.50)
- Magic numbers without named constants (ES.45)
- Mixing signed and unsigned arithmetic (ES.100)
- Reusing names in nested scopes (ES.12)

See `references/code-examples.md` § Expressions & Statements for initialization examples.

## Error Handling (E.*)

| Rule | Summary |
|------|---------|
| **E.1** | Develop an error-handling strategy early in a design |
| **E.2** | Throw an exception to signal that a function can't perform its assigned task |
| **E.6** | Use RAII to prevent leaks |
| **E.12** | Use `noexcept` when throwing is impossible or unacceptable |
| **E.14** | Use purpose-designed user-defined types as exceptions |
| **E.15** | Throw by value, catch by reference |
| **E.16** | Destructors, deallocation, and swap must not fail |
| **E.17** | Avoid trying to catch every exception in every function |

Anti-patterns to avoid:
- Throwing built-in types like `int` or string literals (E.14)
- Catching by value (slicing risk) (E.15)
- Empty catch blocks that silently swallow errors
- Using exceptions for flow control (E.3)
- Error handling based on global state like `errno` (E.28)

See `references/code-examples.md` § Error Handling for exception hierarchy examples.

## Constants & Immutability (Con.*)

| Rule | Summary |
|------|---------|
| **Con.1** | By default, make objects immutable |
| **Con.2** | By default, make member functions `const` |
| **Con.3** | By default, pass pointers and references to `const` |
| **Con.4** | Use `const` for values that don't change after construction |
| **Con.5** | Use `constexpr` for values computable at compile time |

See `references/code-examples.md` § Constants & Immutability for examples.

## Concurrency & Parallelism (CP.*)

| Rule | Summary |
|------|---------|
| **CP.2** | Avoid data races |
| **CP.3** | Minimize explicit sharing of writable data |
| **CP.4** | Think in terms of tasks, rather than threads |
| **CP.8** | Avoid using `volatile` for synchronization |
| **CP.20** | Use RAII, not plain `lock()`/`unlock()` |
| **CP.21** | Use `std::scoped_lock` to acquire multiple mutexes |
| **CP.22** | Avoid calling unknown code while holding a lock |
| **CP.42** | Wait with a condition, not unconditionally |
| **CP.44** | Name your `lock_guard`s and `unique_lock`s |
| **CP.100** | Prefer higher-level concurrency over lock-free programming unless profiling demands it |

Anti-patterns to avoid:
- `volatile` for synchronization (CP.8 — it's for hardware I/O only)
- Detaching threads (CP.26 — lifetime management becomes nearly impossible)
- Unnamed lock guards: `std::lock_guard<std::mutex>(m);` destroys immediately (CP.44)
- Holding locks while calling callbacks (CP.22 — deadlock risk)
- Lock-free programming without deep expertise (CP.100)

See `references/code-examples.md` § Concurrency for thread-safe queue and scoped_lock examples.

## Templates & Generic Programming (T.*)

| Rule | Summary |
|------|---------|
| **T.1** | Use templates to raise the level of abstraction |
| **T.2** | Use templates to express algorithms for many argument types |
| **T.10** | Specify concepts for all template arguments |
| **T.11** | Use standard concepts whenever possible |
| **T.13** | Prefer shorthand notation for simple concepts |
| **T.43** | Prefer `using` over `typedef` |
| **T.120** | Use template metaprogramming only when you really need to |
| **T.144** | Overload function templates instead of specializing them |

Anti-patterns to avoid:
- Unconstrained templates in visible namespaces (T.47)
- Specializing function templates instead of overloading (T.144)
- Template metaprogramming where `constexpr` suffices (T.120)
- `typedef` instead of `using` (T.43)

See `references/code-examples.md` § Templates for C++20 concepts examples.

## Standard Library (SL.*)

| Rule | Summary |
|------|---------|
| **SL.1** | Use libraries wherever possible |
| **SL.2** | Prefer the standard library to other libraries |
| **SL.con.1** | Prefer `std::array` or `std::vector` over C arrays |
| **SL.con.2** | Prefer `std::vector` by default |
| **SL.str.1** | Use `std::string` to own character sequences |
| **SL.str.2** | Use `std::string_view` to refer to character sequences |
| **SL.io.50** | Avoid `endl` (use `'\n'` — `endl` forces a flush) |

## Enumerations (Enum.*)

| Rule | Summary |
|------|---------|
| **Enum.1** | Prefer enumerations over macros |
| **Enum.3** | Prefer `enum class` over plain `enum` |
| **Enum.5** | Avoid ALL_CAPS for enumerators |
| **Enum.6** | Avoid unnamed enumerations |

## Source Files & Naming (SF.*, NL.*)

| Rule | Summary |
|------|---------|
| **SF.1** | Use `.cpp` for code files and `.h` for interface files |
| **SF.7** | Avoid writing `using namespace` at global scope in a header |
| **SF.8** | Use `#include` guards for all `.h` files |
| **SF.11** | Header files should be self-contained |
| **NL.5** | Avoid encoding type information in names (no Hungarian notation) |
| **NL.8** | Use a consistent naming style |
| **NL.9** | Use ALL_CAPS for macro names only |
| **NL.10** | Prefer `underscore_style` names |

See `references/code-examples.md` § Source Files & Naming for header guard and naming convention examples.

## Performance (Per.*)

| Rule | Summary |
|------|---------|
| **Per.1** | Avoid optimizing without reason |
| **Per.2** | Avoid optimizing prematurely |
| **Per.6** | Avoid making claims about performance without measurements |
| **Per.7** | Design to enable optimization |
| **Per.10** | Rely on the static type system |
| **Per.11** | Move computation from run time to compile time |
| **Per.19** | Access memory predictably |

Anti-patterns to avoid:
- Optimizing without profiling data (Per.1, Per.6)
- Choosing "clever" low-level code over clear abstractions (Per.4, Per.5)
- Ignoring data layout and cache behavior (Per.19)

## Quick Reference Checklist

Before marking C++ work complete:

- [ ] No raw `new`/`delete` — use smart pointers or RAII (R.11)
- [ ] Objects initialized at declaration (ES.20)
- [ ] Variables are `const`/`constexpr` by default (Con.1, ES.25)
- [ ] Member functions are `const` where possible (Con.2)
- [ ] `enum class` instead of plain `enum` (Enum.3)
- [ ] `nullptr` instead of `0`/`NULL` (ES.47)
- [ ] No narrowing conversions (ES.46)
- [ ] No C-style casts (ES.48)
- [ ] Single-argument constructors are `explicit` (C.46)
- [ ] Rule of Zero or Rule of Five applied (C.20, C.21)
- [ ] Base class destructors are public virtual or protected non-virtual (C.35)
- [ ] Templates are constrained with concepts (T.10)
- [ ] No `using namespace` in headers at global scope (SF.7)
- [ ] Headers have include guards and are self-contained (SF.8, SF.11)
- [ ] Locks use RAII (`scoped_lock`/`lock_guard`) (CP.20)
- [ ] Exceptions are custom types, thrown by value, caught by reference (E.14, E.15)
- [ ] `'\n'` instead of `std::endl` (SL.io.50)
- [ ] No magic numbers (ES.45)

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md12.9 KB
  • references/code-examples.md8 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.