Cross-validate decisions using multiple AI models (Codex, Gemini, Grok). Use when "get a second opinion", evaluating approaches, or high-stakes decisions.
Scanned 9/20/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add lev-os/agents --skill multi-model-triangulation --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Multi Model Triangulation?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/lev-os-multi-model-triangulation)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: multi-model-triangulation
description: >-
Cross-validate decisions using multiple AI models (Codex, Gemini, Grok).
Use when "get a second opinion", evaluating approaches, or high-stakes decisions.
---
<!-- TOC: Core | Workflow | Quick Prompts | Synthesis | Model Strengths | Anti-Patterns | References -->
# Multi-Model Triangulation
> **Core Insight:** Different models have different blind spots. Consensus = confidence.
## How It Works
You can't directly call other models. Instead:
1. **I generate** copy-paste prompts for you
2. **You paste** into Codex/Gemini/Grok/etc
3. **You return** their responses to me
4. **I synthesize** into unified recommendation
```
Claude → generates prompt → You → paste to Model B → You → paste response back → Claude synthesizes
```
---
## Quick Start
Tell me what you want triangulated:
```
Triangulate: [topic]
Context: [relevant details]
Models to use: [Codex, Gemini, Grok, or "all available"]
```
I'll generate the prompt(s). You copy-paste and return results.
---
## Ready-to-Copy Prompts
### Idea Evaluation
```
# COPY TO [Model Name]:
Evaluate these ideas. Score 1-10 on Quality/Utility/Feasibility/Risk:
1. [IDEA 1]
2. [IDEA 2]
3. [IDEA 3]
For each: scores, one-sentence rationale, final ranking.
Be critical—don't just agree.
```
### Code Review
```
# COPY TO [Model Name]:
Review for bugs/security/improvements:
```[lang]
[CODE]
```
Categorize: Critical (must fix), Important (should fix), Suggestions.
Overall score: X/10. Be thorough.
```
### Architecture Decision
```
# COPY TO [Model Name]:
Choosing between:
A: [Option A]
B: [Option B]
C: [Option C]
Evaluate: complexity, maintainability, performance, scalability.
Recommend ONE with reasoning. Be opinionated.
```
More prompts: [PROMPTS.md](references/PROMPTS.md)
---
## Synthesis Template
After I receive responses from multiple models:
```markdown
## Triangulation: [Topic]
### Consensus (High Confidence)
- [Points ALL models agree on]
### Divergence (Investigate)
| Topic | Claude | Model B | Model C |
|-------|--------|---------|---------|
| [X] | [view] | [view] | [view] |
### Unique Insights
- **Claude:** [unique point]
- **Model B:** [unique point]
### Recommendation
[Synthesized recommendation]
### Confidence: [High/Medium/Low]
```
---
## Model Strengths
| Model | Strengths | Best For |
|-------|-----------|----------|
| Claude | Nuance, safety, writing | Complex reasoning, docs |
| GPT/Codex | Code generation, breadth | Implementation details |
| Gemini | Multimodal, current data | Visual, recent events |
| Grok | Unconventional takes | Creative alternatives |
**Tip:** For security reviews, use ALL models. For routine code review, 2 is enough.
---
## When to Triangulate
| Decision Type | Triangulate? | Why |
|---------------|--------------|-----|
| High-stakes architecture | Yes | Hard to reverse |
| Security review | Yes | Blind spots are dangerous |
| Code review (routine) | Maybe | 1-2 models sufficient |
| Quick question | No | Overhead not worth it |
| Creative brainstorming | Yes | Different perspectives |
**Rule:** If hard to reverse or high-impact, triangulate.
---
## Anti-Patterns
| Don't | Do |
|-------|-----|
| Ask vague questions | Specific, structured prompts |
| Accept first answer | Get 2-3 perspectives |
| Ignore disagreements | Investigate WHY models differ |
| Weight all equally | Consider model strengths |
| Skip synthesis | Always produce unified view |
---
## Integration
### Script Helper
```bash
# Generate formatted prompt for ideas
./scripts/format-prompt.py idea "Idea 1" "Idea 2" "Idea 3"
# For code (reads from stdin)
cat code.py | ./scripts/format-prompt.py code
# For architecture
./scripts/format-prompt.py arch "Use Redis" "Use PostgreSQL"
```
### With Other Skills
| Combine with... | For... |
|-----------------|--------|
| ux-audit | Get multiple UX perspectives |
| multi-pass-bug-hunting | Cross-validate bug findings |
| idea-wizard | Score generated ideas |
---
## References
| Topic | File |
|-------|------|
| Full prompt library | [PROMPTS.md](references/PROMPTS.md) |
| Real examples | [EXAMPLES.md](references/EXAMPLES.md) |
## Scripts
| Script | Purpose |
|--------|---------|
| `scripts/format-prompt.py` | Generate copy-paste ready prompts |
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!