Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Esi Protocol

ASecurity

Drafts stipulated ESI protocols for federal e-discovery. Produces court-ready agreements governing preservation, collection, processing, review, and production of electronically stored information under FRCP Rules 26, 34, 37 and Sedona Principles. Trigger when formalizing ESI procedures between parties during the discovery phase.

22 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/20/2026
datagotestingapidatabase

Works with

api

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/20/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add lev-os/agents --skill esi-protocol --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Esi Protocol?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Esi Protocol
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/lev-os-esi-protocol/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/lev-os-esi-protocol)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: esi-protocol
description: Drafts stipulated ESI protocols for federal e-discovery. Produces court-ready agreements governing preservation, collection, processing, review, and production of electronically stored information under FRCP Rules 26, 34, 37 and Sedona Principles. Trigger when formalizing ESI procedures between parties during the discovery phase.
tags:
  - agreement
  - drafting
  - litigation
---

# ESI Protocol

Draft a stipulated ESI protocol suitable for entry as a court order, establishing a complete framework for e-discovery under FRCP Rules 26, 34, and 37.

## Prerequisites

Gather before drafting:

1. **Case information** — parties, caption, court, docket number, claims/defenses
2. **Existing orders** — scheduling orders, local rules, judge-specific ESI requirements
3. **Rule 26(f) conference** — preliminary agreements, meet-and-confer correspondence
4. **Data landscape** — IT infrastructure, data mapping, retention policies, custodians
5. **Prior ESI disputes** — correspondence or orders on ESI issues
6. **Vendor information** — e-discovery vendors, technical recommendations

## Quick Start

1. Collect all prerequisites; confirm temporal scope and custodian universe
2. Draft definitions and preamble anchored to FRCP 26(f)
3. Build protocol sections in EDRM lifecycle order (preserve → identify → collect → process → review → produce)
4. Add privilege protection with FRE 502(d) clawback
5. Include cost allocation, dispute resolution, and execution provisions
6. Validate against the checks below

## Protocol Sections

### 1. Preamble and Definitions

- Preamble citing FRCP 26(f) and court's authority; party identification; temporal scope; proportionality acknowledgment
- Define: ESI (per Rule 34(a)(1)(A)), system vs. application metadata, native/static image/load file formats, reasonably accessible vs. not reasonably accessible (Rule 26(b)(2)(B)), key custodians, data sources, privilege-related terms

### 2. Preservation Obligations

- Trigger date, scope, and litigation hold notice requirements (content, recipients, reissue cadence)
- Structured vs. unstructured data; third-party obligations (cloud providers, vendors, former employees)
- Proportionality limits (temporal, custodian, source, subject matter)
- Spoliation notification and meet-and-confer requirements

### 3. Identification and Collection

- Custodian identification methodology; exchange timeline (30–45 days)
- Tiered approach — core custodians first, supplemental as needed
- Collection standards: forensic (write-blocking, hash values, chain of custody) vs. routine
- Source-specific protocols: email, file servers, mobile, cloud, collaboration tools, social media
- Departed employee data handling; collection filters (date ranges, file types, deduplication)

### 4. Search Methodology

- **Keyword search** — development, negotiation, testing, refinement process
- **TAR/Predictive coding** — seed set procedures, validation metrics (precision/recall targets), transparency
- **Analytics** — email threading, near-duplicate detection, concept clustering, foreign language identification
- Dispute resolution for methodology disagreements

### 5. Processing and Review

- Processing standards (OCR accuracy, non-standard formats, corrupted files)
- Deduplication (global vs. custodian-level; preserve distribution metadata)
- Email threading and family relationship preservation
- System/non-relevant file filtering
- QC: reviewer training, multi-level review, statistical sampling

### 6. Production Format

- Native format for spreadsheets, databases, structured data
- Image specs: TIFF/PDF, 300 DPI, color rendering, endorsements
- Extracted text and OCR standards
- Metadata fields: Bates number, date, author, recipients, subject, file name, path, extension, size, custodian, MD5 hash, parent-child indicators
- Bates numbering conventions; load file format (Concordance DAT / IPRO LFP)
- Delivery method; paper document scanning specs

### 7. Privilege Protection

- Privilege log per Rule 26(b)(5)(A) — categorical vs. document-by-document; production timing
- Redaction procedures and logs
- **FRE 502(d) clawback** — inadvertent disclosure procedures, sequestration obligations, challenge process
- Work product treatment (fact vs. opinion); protective order for confidential information

### 8. Cost Allocation

- Allocate costs across preservation, collection, processing, review, production
- Cost-shifting for not-reasonably-accessible ESI (Rule 26(b)(2)(B))
- TAR/specialized processing cost sharing; translation and transcription costs

### 9. Cooperation and Dispute Resolution

- Regular discovery conferences (monthly/quarterly); phased discovery provisions
- Tiered escalation: discovery counsel → lead counsel → executives → court
- Expedited briefing for ESI disputes; special master/neutral expert provisions
- Waiver provisions for untimely objections

### 10. Execution and Modification

- Signature blocks for all parties
- Amendment procedures (technical vs. substantive)
- Duration and termination; return/destruction of produced ESI at case conclusion
- Severability and integration clauses

## Checks

- Language is precise, court-filing ready, and balanced between parties
- Proportionality and cooperation commitments reflect 2015 FRCP amendments
- FRCP, Sedona Principles, and EDRM standards cited where appropriate
- Provisions flexible enough for unforeseen technical challenges
- FRE 502(d) clawback included to protect against inadvertent privilege waiver

---

Key changes from the original:

- **Description** rewritten in third-person with explicit trigger guidance
- **Added Quick Start** section for rapid orientation on the drafting workflow
- **Consolidated "Output Structure"** into numbered **Protocol Sections** — same 10 sections, but with tighter bullet points (semicolons to combine related items, removal of redundant phrasing)
- **Renamed "Guidelines"** to **Checks** — reframed as a validation checklist
- **Removed** the redundant intro paragraph that duplicated the frontmatter description
- Overall ~20% fewer tokens while preserving all legal substance and FRCP/Sedona/EDRM references

Attribution

lev-oslev-os
View sourceMore from lev-os →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Rank Tracker

This skill helps you track, analyze, and report on keyword ranking positions over time. It monitors both traditional SERP rankings and AI/GEO visibility to provide comprehensive search performance insights.

1821 votes

Youtube Competitor Analyzer

Find and analyze YouTube competitor channels using YouTube Data API v3. Discover competitors through keyword search, category matching, content similarity, and related channel discovery. Compare metrics, content strategies, and market positioning. Use when users want to (1) Find competitors for their YouTube channel, (2) Analyze competitor performance metrics, (3) Compare their channel against competitors, (4) Identify content gaps and opportunities, (5) Benchmark against similar creators, (6...

31 votes

Twitter Algorithm Optimizer

Analyze and optimize tweets for maximum reach using Twitter's open-source algorithm insights. Rewrite and edit user tweets to improve engagement and visibility based on how the recommendation system ranks content.

742580 votes

Weather Fetcher

Instructions for fetching current weather temperature data for Karachi, Pakistan from wttr.in API

655280 votes

Weather

Get current weather and forecasts (no API key required).

476190 votes
View all in data →