Skip to content
Back to skills

Writing Skills

ASecurity

TDD for process documentation - write test cases (pressure scenarios), watch baseline fail, write skill, iterate until bulletproof against rationalization.

  • 215 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added May 27, 2026
developmenttestingapidocumentation

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 5 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add LerianStudio/ring --skill writing-skills --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Writing Skills?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Writing Skills
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/lerianstudio-writing-skills/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/lerianstudio-writing-skills)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: ring:writing-skills
description: |
  TDD for process documentation - write test cases (pressure scenarios), watch
  baseline fail, write skill, iterate until bulletproof against rationalization.
---

# Writing Skills

## When to use
- Creating a new skill
- Editing an existing skill
- Skill needs to resist rationalization under pressure

## Skip when
- Writing pure reference skill (API docs) → no rules to test
- Skill has no compliance costs → no rationalization risk

## Related
**Complementary:** ring:testing-skills-with-subagents

**Writing skills IS TDD applied to process documentation.**

Same Iron Law: No skill without failing test first.  
Same cycle: RED (baseline) → GREEN (write skill) → REFACTOR (close loopholes).

**REQUIRED BACKGROUND:** Understand ring:test-driven-development before using this skill.

## What is a Skill?

A reusable reference guide for proven techniques, patterns, or tools. **Not** a narrative about how you solved something once.

**Create when:** technique wasn't obvious, you'd reference it again, applies broadly.  
**Skip when:** one-off solution, project-specific convention (put in CLAUDE.md).

## Skill Types

| Type | Examples |
|------|---------|
| Technique (steps to follow) | condition-based-waiting, root-cause-tracing |
| Pattern (way of thinking) | flatten-with-flags, test-invariants |
| Reference (docs/API) | API reference, command syntax |

## SKILL.md Structure

```
---
name: ring:skill-name-with-hyphens
description: Use when [triggers/symptoms] — [what it does, third person]
---
# Skill Name
## Overview (1-2 sentences)
## When to Use (symptoms + skip conditions)
## Core Pattern (before/after examples)
## Quick Reference (table for scanning)
## Implementation (inline or linked)
## Common Mistakes
```

**Frontmatter rules:** Only `name` and `description`. Max 1024 chars total. `name`: letters, numbers, hyphens only. `description`: third-person, starts "Use when...", <500 chars if possible.

## Agent Search Optimization (ASO)

**Agents read description to decide which skills to load.** Make it answer: "Should I read this skill right now?"

- Use concrete triggers and symptoms (problem-focused, not language-specific)
- Use keywords agents would search: error messages, symptoms, tool names
- Active voice, verb-first names: `creating-skills` not `skill-creation`
- Reference skills by name only: `ring:test-driven-development`, no `@` links (force-loads context)

## Token Efficiency

| Skill Type | Target |
|------------|--------|
| Bootstrap/getting-started | <150 words (loads in every session) |
| Simple technique | <500 words |
| Discipline-enforcing | <2,000 words (need rationalization tables) |
| Process/workflow | <4,000 words (multi-phase workflows) |

## RED-GREEN-REFACTOR for Skills

| Phase | Action |
|-------|--------|
| **RED** | Run pressure scenario WITHOUT skill → document agent choices/rationalizations verbatim |
| **GREEN** | Write skill addressing specific failures → verify agent now complies |
| **REFACTOR** | Find new rationalizations → add counters → re-test until bulletproof |

**REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use ring:testing-skills-with-subagents for pressure scenarios and hole-plugging.

## The Iron Law

```
NO SKILL WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST
```

Applies to new skills AND edits. Delete untested skills and start over. No exceptions.

## Bulletproofing Against Rationalization

For discipline-enforcing skills:

1. **Forbid specific workarounds explicitly** — don't just state the rule, list prohibited alternatives
2. **Address "spirit vs letter" early:** `"Violating the letter is violating the spirit."`
3. **Build rationalization table** from baseline testing — capture every excuse agents make
4. **Create Red Flags list** — make self-checking easy

```markdown
## Red Flags — STOP
- [symptom 1]
- [symptom 2]
All of these mean: [required action].
```

## Skill Creation Checklist

| Phase | Requirements |
|-------|--------------|
| RED | 3+ pressure scenarios, run WITHOUT skill, document rationalizations verbatim |
| GREEN | Valid frontmatter, description starts "Use when...", addresses baseline failures, one excellent example, verify compliance |
| REFACTOR | Rationalization table, Red Flags list, re-test against new loopholes |
| Quality | Flowchart only if non-obvious, quick ref table, no narrative |
| Deploy | Commit and push |

**STOP after each skill — do NOT batch-create without testing each.**

## File Organization

| Type | Structure |
|------|-----------|
| Self-contained | `skill/SKILL.md` only |
| With tool | `SKILL.md` + reusable script |
| Heavy reference | `SKILL.md` + `*.md` refs + `scripts/` |

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB
  • anthropic-best-practices.md44.4 KB
  • anthropic-building-skills-guide.md15.9 KB
  • graphviz-conventions.dot5.8 KB
  • persuasion-principles.md5.8 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.