Skip to content
Back to skills

Ios Memgraph Leaks

ASecurity

Capture and inspect iOS leaks and memgraphs. Use when debugging leaked objects, retain cycles, memory growth, or before/after leak evidence.

  • 4 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 4 views
  • Added August 31, 2026
researchbashdebugging

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 4 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned August 31, 2026

npx -y skills add kvn8888/OpenFoodJournal --skill ios-memgraph-leaks --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ios Memgraph Leaks?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ios Memgraph Leaks
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/kvn8888-ios-memgraph-leaks/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/kvn8888-ios-memgraph-leaks)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: ios-memgraph-leaks
description: Capture and inspect iOS leaks and memgraphs. Use when debugging leaked objects, retain cycles, memory growth, or before/after leak evidence.
---

# iOS Memgraph Leaks

Use this skill to prove iOS leaks from a live simulator process or an existing `.memgraph`. Pair it with `../ios-debugger-agent/SKILL.md` when the task also needs simulator build, install, launch, UI driving, logs, or screenshots.

## Core Workflow

1. Build, launch, and drive the exact flow that should release objects.
2. Capture a memgraph from the running simulator process with `scripts/capture_sim_memgraph.sh`.
3. Summarize leaks with `scripts/summarize_memgraph_leaks.py`.
4. For each app-owned leaked type, inspect ownership with `leaks --traceTree=<address> <file.memgraph>` and grouped leak evidence.
5. Make the smallest root-cause patch, then recapture the same flow on the same simulator when possible.
6. Report proof: before/after leak counts, disappeared root types, remaining leaks, memgraph paths, and test/build results.

Do not claim a leak fix from a smaller memgraph alone. A credible fix explains the ownership path that kept the object alive and shows that the same path or type disappears after the patch.

## Capture

Prefer capturing from the simulator already used for the reproduction. Resolve the simulator UDID and app bundle identifier, then capture the running app:

```bash
SKILL_DIR="<absolute path to this loaded skill folder>"
SIM="<simulator-udid>"
BUNDLE_ID="<app.bundle.identifier>"
MEMGRAPH_DIR="$(mktemp -d "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/codex-ios-memgraph.XXXXXX")"

"$SKILL_DIR/scripts/capture_sim_memgraph.sh" \
  --udid "$SIM" \
  --bundle-id "$BUNDLE_ID" \
  --out-dir "$MEMGRAPH_DIR"
```

Do not derive `SKILL_DIR` from the target app repo's `pwd`; installed plugins usually live outside the app being debugged. Store captures in a run-specific temp or user-chosen folder, not under `SKILL_DIR`.

If the process cannot be found, confirm the bundle identifier and use `xcrun simctl spawn "$SIM" launchctl list` to inspect running labels.

## Summarize

Summarize an existing memgraph:

```bash
"$SKILL_DIR/scripts/summarize_memgraph_leaks.py" \
  /path/to/app.memgraph \
  --trace-limit 5 \
  --out /path/to/leak-summary.md
```

Use `--trace-limit` sparingly. Trace trees are useful root-cause evidence, but large memgraphs can produce noisy output. If a trace tree says `Found 0 roots referencing`, treat it as an unreachable/self-retained leak candidate and use the summary's grouped leak tree or `leaks --groupByType <file.memgraph>` to identify the retained fields and payload chain.

## Root Cause Rules

- Identify the first app-owned leaked type in the leak output or trace.
- Determine the intended lifetime: process, session, account, view, request, or task.
- Treat lazy or deferred allocation as a scope reduction, not a leak fix, unless the original eager allocation itself violated the intended lifetime.
- Prove retain-cycle claims with either a `traceTree` ownership path or an isolated reproduction.
- For unreachable/self-cycle leaks, `traceTree` may have no root path; use `leaks --groupByType` plus source verification to find the self-retaining edge.
- Do not claim success just because total leak count went down; prove the specific type or path disappeared.
- Separate real root-cause branches from candidate/noise branches.
- Prefer deleting the retaining edge over adding broad cleanup code.

## Report

A useful leak report includes:

- the exact flow and simulator/app build
- the memgraph and summary paths
- app-owned leaked types and counts
- at least one ownership path, or grouped leak tree evidence when the object is unreachable from roots
- the smallest proposed or applied retaining-edge fix
- before/after evidence when a fix was made

If the memgraph shows only framework/runtime noise, say that and recommend the next narrower capture rather than inventing an app leak.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml247 B
  • scripts/capture_sim_memgraph.sh3 KB
  • scripts/summarize_memgraph_leaks.py5.6 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.