SQL reasoning, validation, reconciliation, transformation, diagnostics, and anti-pattern knowledge layer for Seshat BI agents. Use when a task involves reasoning about source SQL: source profiling, table grain, keys & uniqueness, joins & fan-out amplification, aggregation correctness, COUNT/NULL semantics, deduplication, validation queries, reconciliation queries, silver/gold transformation logic, window/date-time analytics, SQL anti-patterns, or basic SQL performance reasoning, or interpreta...
Pro scans all 20 files and shows the line behind each finding
Scanned 9/29/2026
npx -y skills add Kemetra/Seshat-BI --skill bi-sql-knowledge --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Bi Sql Knowledge?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/kemetra-bi-sql-knowledge-seshat-bi)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: bi-sql-knowledge
description: >-
SQL reasoning, validation, reconciliation, transformation, diagnostics, and anti-pattern
knowledge layer for Seshat BI agents. Use when a task involves reasoning about source SQL:
source profiling, table grain, keys & uniqueness, joins & fan-out amplification, aggregation
correctness, COUNT/NULL semantics, deduplication, validation queries, reconciliation queries,
silver/gold transformation logic, window/date-time analytics, SQL anti-patterns, or basic SQL
performance reasoning, or interpretation of a supplied sanitized PostgreSQL JSON execution
plan. The SQL counterpart to bi-dax-knowledge. It is a thinking & validation layer, not a
database executor, runtime validator, dbt/Dagster project, or automatic tuning service.
---
# BI SQL Knowledge (Seshat BI)
A navigational interface to a SQL **reasoning and validation** knowledge base. It teaches an
agent to reason about SQL correctly -- with table **grain** and **aggregation correctness** as
its foundation, the way filter context is the foundation of `bi-dax-knowledge`.
This file is short by design. **It does not contain the knowledge base.** Do not read every
file in this skill. Follow the flow below.
## Mandatory flow (do not skip a step, do not lose the compass)
```text
Router -> this SKILL.md -> INDEX.md -> ONLY the relevant file(s) -> output contract / checklist
```
1. **Open `INDEX.md` first.** It routes by task and by symptom to the specific file(s) you need.
2. **Read only what the route names** -- one or two knowledge files, one JSON, one checklist.
Reading the whole base is an anti-pattern; it wastes context and dilutes the answer.
3. **Ground the grain before anything else.** State what one row of the input/result means
(`knowledge/sql-core-concepts.md`, SC-003). Most SQL bugs are grain errors.
4. **End on an artifact:** a validation gate (`patterns/sql-validation-patterns.json`, VP-*),
a checklist (`checklists/`), or a diagnostic verdict (`knowledge/sql-diagnostics-playbook.md`,
PB-SQL-*). Never end on prose alone.
## What this skill is for
Reasoning about, reviewing, and validating SQL used in BI pipelines: profiling a source;
grain / keys / uniqueness; joins and **fan-out amplification**; aggregation correctness
(`COUNT` / `SUM` / `AVG`, `GROUP BY`); `COUNT` and `NULL` semantics; deduplication; **validation**
and **reconciliation** queries; silver/gold transformation logic (DML, reshaping, cleaning,
set operations, date recipes, gaps/islands, hierarchy, metadata-driven profiling); window and
date/time analytics; SQL anti-patterns (including shell/encoding pitfalls like matching a
non-ASCII/RTL literal on a command line); basic performance reasoning; and evidence-gated,
read-only interpretation of supplied PostgreSQL JSON execution plans.
## What this skill is NOT for
Not a SQL tutorial; not a chapter-by-chapter book summary; not a replacement for any book;
not a database execution tool; not a runtime validator; not a dbt/Dagster project; not an
automatic PostgreSQL tuning service; not the Power BI dashboard or DAX layer. It reasons about
SQL and supplied plans; it never runs them.
## Routing boundaries (pick the right skill before working)
| The task is about... | Route to |
|---|---|
| Source mapping / retail pipeline readiness | `source-mapping` / `retail-onboard-table` (the readiness spine) |
| SQL reasoning / profiling / validation / reconciliation / transformation logic | **`bi-sql-knowledge`** (this skill) |
| DAX generation / review / performance / model prerequisites | `bi-dax-knowledge` |
| Dashboard / visual / page design | `powerbi-dashboard-design` |
Where it sits in the pipeline:
```text
source -> [source-mapping / retail-onboard-table: mapping / readiness]
-> [bi-sql-knowledge: profile / validate / reconcile / transform -> silver/gold]
-> [bi-dax-knowledge: measures / model]
-> [powerbi-dashboard-design: visuals / pages]
```
A validated gold table with a known grain and verified unique keys is the hand-off to
`bi-dax-knowledge`: grain and uniqueness feed DAX additivity reasoning.
## Stop rules
- **Stop and ask for metadata, do not guess.** When two cheap checks -- a `COUNT(*)` comparison
and a uniqueness check -- can't localize a problem, request schema/source metadata (primary
keys, expected grain, null semantics, SLA, expected volumes). Establishing these facts is the
job; inventing them is not.
- **Stop at the routing boundary.** If the real task is DAX, a dashboard, or source mapping,
hand off to the skill above instead of answering here.
- **Stop before executing.** This layer produces SQL *reasoning* and *gate shapes*. It does not
run queries, wire a runtime, build a CLI, or publish anything.
- **Stop without plan evidence.** Bare SQL can support a hypothesis, not a PostgreSQL performance
verdict. Plan review requires a supplied, sanitized JSON plan and representative context.
- **Never fake a pass.** Validation/reconciliation results are evidence-based; a gate with no
evidence is `blocked`, never `pass`.
## ID conventions (full detail in `references/id-conventions.md`)
Concepts `SC-001..070` - plan concepts `EP-001..014` - plan patterns `EP-PAT-*` -
anti-patterns `SQL-AP-001..061` - validation gates `VP-*` - diagnostic playbooks
`PB-SQL-01..19` - analyzer-rule candidates `SARC-*` (staged) - promoted draft analyzer rules
`SAR-*` (static draft, not runtime-enforced).
## Boundaries
Not implementation, not database execution, not dbt/Dagster, not a runtime validator
(validation patterns are reasoning templates, not an executing engine), not a replacement for
any book, not automatic PostgreSQL tuning. An agent knowledge layer. All examples are original
Seshat BI / retail examples on a fictional schema; no book text or datasets are reproduced
(`references/copyright-safety.md`).
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!