Skip to content
Back to skills

Blocking Io Guard

ASecurity

Ensure async-path backend code that could block the asyncio event loop is protected by a teeth-verified runtime anchor in tests/blocking_io/. Use when changing backend Python under app/, packages/harness/deerflow/, or scripts/, when running a blocking-IO triage round over the whole repo, or when a reviewer/CI asks for blocking-IO coverage. Runs a deterministic scan (changed-lines or full-repo), routes each candidate, drafts/extends an anchor, and proves it fails when the blocking IO regresses.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added October 17, 2026
developmentpythongobashgitbackend

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 17, 2026

npx -y skills add karanmrn/karanagentskills --skill blocking-io-guard --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Blocking Io Guard?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Blocking Io Guard
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/karanmrn-blocking-io-guard/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/karanmrn-blocking-io-guard)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

SKILL.md
---
name: blocking-io-guard
description: Ensure async-path backend code that could block the asyncio event loop is protected by a teeth-verified runtime anchor in tests/blocking_io/. Use when changing backend Python under app/, packages/harness/deerflow/, or scripts/, when running a blocking-IO triage round over the whole repo, or when a reviewer/CI asks for blocking-IO coverage. Runs a deterministic scan (changed-lines or full-repo), routes each candidate, drafts/extends an anchor, and proves it fails when the blocking IO regresses.
---

# Blocking-IO Guard Skill

Help a contributor ship backend async changes together with the runtime anchor
that lets DeerFlow's blocking-IO CI gate actually see the new code. The dynamic
detector only catches blocking IO on paths a test executes — this skill closes
that gap, either for your own diff or for a repo-wide triage round.

Read `references/good-anchor-rules.md` before writing any anchor.
Only read `references/sop-skeleton.md` when generalizing this SOP to another
detector domain — it is not needed to execute the steps below.

## When to use

- Your change touches Python under `backend/app/`,
  `backend/packages/harness/deerflow/`, or `backend/scripts/` and may run on
  the async event loop (Mode A). If unsure, run Step 0 — it answers
  deterministically.
- You are doing a maintenance triage round over the existing codebase
  (Mode B).

## SOP (router)

### Step 0 — Scope (deterministic)

**Mode A — your own diff** (default, pre-PR). From repo root:

```bash
uv run --project backend python scripts/scan_changed_blocking_io.py --base origin/main
```

Lists blocking-IO candidates your change introduces: findings on lines the
diff added, **plus** findings that are new versus the merge base — the latter
catches a new async caller exposing an old sync helper whose blocking line is
not in the diff. The diff is `<base>...HEAD`, so **commit your work first** —
uncommitted lines are not selected.

If the list is empty, this change introduces no blocking-IO surface *that the
static detector can see in the changed files*. One residual blind spot
remains: reachability is same-file only, so a new async caller of a sync
helper **defined in another file** is invisible to both selections. If your
diff adds an async call into a helper that lives elsewhere, check that helper
manually (codegraph or `git grep`) before stopping.

**Mode B — full-repo triage round.** From repo root:

```bash
make detect-blocking-io
```

Prints a summary and writes the complete structured finding list to
`.deer-flow/blocking-io-findings.json`. Work HIGH priority first; do not start
MEDIUM until every HIGH is dispositioned (fixed, guarded, or recorded
NO-ACTION).

**Batching policy (PR sizing).** One **fix unit** per PR while any HIGH
remains: a fix unit is one root cause — usually a single HIGH, but two HIGHs
resolved by the same one-place fix belong together. Once no HIGH remains,
MEDIUM/LOW may be batched (about five per round, grouped by module or by
disposition) so each PR stays reviewable. A new Blockbuster rule is never
batched with anything — it always ships alone (see Step 5).

Both modes emit the same JSON shape per finding: `priority`, `location`
(path/line/function), `blocking_call` (category/operation/symbol),
`event_loop_exposure`, `reason`, `code`. Priority is a deterministic review
ordering, not proof of a bug — Step 1 makes the actual call.

### Step 1 — Judge each candidate (router)

Read the code around each candidate and route it:

- **Already offloaded** (`asyncio.to_thread`, `run_in_executor`, async client) →
  **GUARD**: add/extend an anchor that locks the offload so a future edit cannot
  move it back onto the loop.
- **On the loop, not offloaded** → **FIX+ANCHOR**: offload the production code
  (your fix), then add an anchor that guards it.
- **Not actually exposed / acceptable** (rare: scanner false positive,
  startup-only code) → **NO-ACTION**: record one line of why.
- **Cross-file caveat**: the scanner's async reachability is same-file only
  (`ASYNC_REACHABLE_SAME_FILE`). If the candidate is a *sync helper*, check for
  async callers in other files (codegraph or `git grep`) before deciding
  NO-ACTION.

### Step 2 — Apply the fix, then re-scan (FIX+ANCHOR only)

Offload the blocking call in production code, then re-run the Step 0 scan and
confirm the candidate no longer appears. If the offloaded call sits in a
`finally` / cleanup path, keep it best-effort and bounded (swallow-and-log,
`asyncio.wait_for`) so a failing or hung cleanup cannot mask the primary
exception. Match by the stable key
**(path, function, symbol)** — line numbers shift after edits, so never
compare by line.

- The finding must disappear. If it still shows, the fix did not remove the
  blocking pattern (e.g. the call is still a direct call, not offloaded) —
  go back before touching any test.
- GUARD / NO-ACTION routes skip this step: a residual finding there is
  *expected* (the raw call still exists inside a sync helper with the offload
  at the caller, or the exposure was judged acceptable).

This is pattern-level feedback in seconds; it complements but never replaces
Step 5 — only the runtime gate proves the event loop is actually protected.

### Step 3 — Check existing anchors

Look in `backend/tests/blocking_io/` for a test that drives the production async
entry point reaching this candidate's branch.

- Covers this branch already → go to Step 5 (re-verify teeth).
- Covers the entry point but not this branch (e.g. happy path covered,
  cleanup/404/409 not) → **extend** that anchor.
- None → create one from `templates/anchor.template.py`.

### Step 4 — Generate / extend the anchor

Follow `references/good-anchor-rules.md`. Drive the *specific* branch (e.g. force
the create failure that hits the cleanup `shutil.rmtree`). Never bypass the
blocking surface with a test-only `asyncio.to_thread` wrapper.

### Step 5 — Verify teeth (mandatory; also the anchor-vs-rule discriminator)

1. Reintroduce the block (GUARD: temporarily revert the offload; FIX+ANCHOR: run
   against the pre-fix code).
2. Run `cd backend && make test-blocking-io` (or target the one test). It **must
   go RED**.
3. Restore the fix. It **must go GREEN**.

A real block that stays GREEN means Blockbuster has no rule for that
primitive — that is the **RULE** route; see `references/good-anchor-rules.md`
for the admission criteria before adding one.

### Step 6 — Deliver

Commit the anchor(s) with your change; `make test-blocking-io` green. In the PR,
note: candidates found, each disposition, the re-scan result (Step 2), and
the teeth evidence (red→green). Include the reason for any NO-ACTION. A new
Blockbuster rule, if any, goes in its own commit with the evidence from Step 5.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.