Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Speculative Decoding

ASecurity

Accelerate LLM inference using speculative decoding, Medusa multiple heads, and lookahead decoding techniques. Use when optimizing inference speed (1.5-3.6× speedup), reducing latency for real-time applications, or deploying models with limited compute. Covers draft models, tree-based attention, Jacobi iteration, parallel token generation, and production deployment strategies.

7 stars
0 votes
0 copies
2 views
Added 10/4/2026
researchpythongobashgitperformance

Security Analysis

A96/100
mediumInstalls packages at runtime which could introduce malicious dependencies

Pro scans all 3 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned 10/4/2026

$npx -y skills add KalarisLabs/research-agent-skills --skill speculative-decoding --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Speculative Decoding?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Speculative Decoding
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/kalarislabs-speculative-decoding/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/kalarislabs-speculative-decoding)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: speculative-decoding
description: Accelerate LLM inference using speculative decoding, Medusa multiple heads, and lookahead decoding techniques. Use when optimizing inference speed (1.5-3.6× speedup), reducing latency for real-time applications, or deploying models with limited compute. Covers draft models, tree-based attention, Jacobi iteration, parallel token generation, and production deployment strategies.
license: MIT
metadata:
  version: 1.0.0
  category: multimodal-and-emerging
  maintainer: Kalaris Labs
  tags: Emerging Techniques, Speculative Decoding, Medusa, Lookahead Decoding, Fast Inference, Draft Models, Tree Attention, Parallel Generation, Latency Reduction, Inference Optimization
  dependencies: transformers, torch
---

# Speculative Decoding: Accelerating LLM Inference

## When to Use This Skill

Use Speculative Decoding when you need to:
- **Speed up inference** by 1.5-3.6× without quality loss
- **Reduce latency** for real-time applications (chatbots, code generation)
- **Optimize throughput** for high-volume serving
- **Deploy efficiently** on limited hardware
- **Generate faster** without changing model architecture

**Key Techniques**: Draft model speculative decoding, Medusa (multiple heads), Lookahead Decoding (Jacobi iteration)

**Papers**: Medusa (arXiv 2401.10774), Lookahead Decoding (ICML 2024), Speculative Decoding Survey (ACL 2024)

## Installation

```bash
# Standard speculative decoding (transformers)
pip install transformers accelerate

# Medusa (multiple decoding heads)
git clone https://github.com/FasterDecoding/Medusa
cd Medusa
pip install -e .

# Lookahead Decoding
git clone https://github.com/hao-ai-lab/LookaheadDecoding
cd LookaheadDecoding
pip install -e .

# Optional: vLLM with speculative decoding
pip install vllm
```

## Quick Start

### Basic Speculative Decoding (Draft Model)

```python
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer

# Load target model (large, slow)
target_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
    "meta-llama/Llama-2-70b-hf",
    device_map="auto",
    torch_dtype=torch.float16
)

# Load draft model (small, fast)
draft_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
    "meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf",
    device_map="auto",
    torch_dtype=torch.float16
)

tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("meta-llama/Llama-2-70b-hf")

# Generate with speculative decoding
prompt = "Explain quantum computing in simple terms:"
inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda")

# Transformers 4.36+ supports assisted generation
outputs = target_model.generate(
    **inputs,
    assistant_model=draft_model,  # Enable speculative decoding
    max_new_tokens=256,
    do_sample=True,
    temperature=0.7,
)

response = tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True)
print(response)
```

### Medusa (Multiple Decoding Heads)

```python
from medusa.model.medusa_model import MedusaModel

# Load Medusa-enhanced model
model = MedusaModel.from_pretrained(
    "FasterDecoding/medusa-vicuna-7b-v1.3",  # Pre-trained with Medusa heads
    torch_dtype=torch.float16,
    device_map="auto"
)

tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("FasterDecoding/medusa-vicuna-7b-v1.3")

# Generate with Medusa (2-3× speedup)
prompt = "Write a Python function to calculate fibonacci numbers:"
inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda")

outputs = model.medusa_generate(
    **inputs,
    max_new_tokens=256,
    temperature=0.7,
    posterior_threshold=0.09,  # Acceptance threshold
    posterior_alpha=0.3,       # Tree construction parameter
)

response = tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True)
```

### Lookahead Decoding (Jacobi Iteration)

```python
from lookahead.lookahead_decoding import LookaheadDecoding

# Load model
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
    "meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf",
    torch_dtype=torch.float16,
    device_map="auto"
)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf")

# Initialize lookahead decoding
lookahead = LookaheadDecoding(
    model=model,
    tokenizer=tokenizer,
    window_size=15,    # Lookahead window (W)
    ngram_size=5,      # N-gram size (N)
    guess_size=5       # Number of parallel guesses
)

# Generate (1.5-2.3× speedup)
prompt = "Implement quicksort in Python:"
output = lookahead.generate(prompt, max_new_tokens=256)
print(output)
```

## Core Concepts

### 1. Speculative Decoding (Draft Model)

**Idea**: Use small draft model to generate candidates, large target model to verify in parallel.

**Algorithm**:
1. Draft model generates K tokens speculatively
2. Target model evaluates all K tokens in parallel (single forward pass)
3. Accept tokens where draft and target agree
4. Reject first disagreement, continue from there

```python
def speculative_decode(target_model, draft_model, prompt, K=4):
    """Speculative decoding algorithm."""
    # 1. Generate K draft tokens
    draft_tokens = draft_model.generate(prompt, max_new_tokens=K)

    # 2. Target model evaluates all K tokens in one forward pass
    target_logits = target_model(draft_tokens)  # Parallel!

    # 3. Accept/reject based on probability match
    accepted = []
    for i in range(K):
        p_draft = softmax(draft_model.logits[i])
        p_target = softmax(target_logits[i])

        # Acceptance probability
        if random.random() < min(1, p_target[draft_tokens[i]] / p_draft[draft_tokens[i]]):
            accepted.append(draft_tokens[i])
        else:
            break  # Reject, resample from target

    return accepted
```

**Performance**:
- Speedup: 1.5-2× with good draft model
- Zero quality loss (mathematically equivalent to target model)
- Best when draft model is 5-10× smaller than target

### 2. Medusa (Multiple Decoding Heads)

**Source**: arXiv 2401.10774 (2024)

**Innovation**: Add multiple prediction heads to existing model, predict future tokens without separate draft model.

**Architecture**:
```
Input → Base LLM (frozen) → Hidden State
                                ├→ Head 1 (predicts token t+1)
                                ├→ Head 2 (predicts token t+2)
                                ├→ Head 3 (predicts token t+3)
                                └→ Head 4 (predicts token t+4)
```

**Training**:
- **Medusa-1**: Freeze base LLM, train only heads
  - 2.2× speedup, lossless
- **Medusa-2**: Fine-tune base LLM + heads together
  - 2.3-3.6× speedup, better quality

**Tree-based Attention**:
```python
# Medusa constructs tree of candidates
# Example: Predict 2 steps ahead with top-2 per step

#         Root
#        /    \
#      T1a    T1b  (Step 1: 2 candidates)
#     /  \    / \
#  T2a  T2b T2c T2d  (Step 2: 4 candidates total)

# Single forward pass evaluates entire tree!
```

**Advantages**:
- No separate draft model needed
- Minimal training (only heads)
- Compatible with any LLM

### 3. Lookahead Decoding (Jacobi Iteration)

**Source**: ICML 2024

**Core idea**: Reformulate autoregressive decoding as solving system of equations, solve in parallel using Jacobi iteration.

**Mathematical formulation**:
```
Traditional:  y_t = f(x, y_1, ..., y_{t-1})  (sequential)
Jacobi:       y_t^{(k+1)} = f(x, y_1^{(k)}, ..., y_{t-1}^{(k)})  (parallel)
```

**Two branches**:

1. **Lookahead Branch**: Generate n-grams in parallel
   - Window size W: How many steps to look ahead
   - N-gram size N: How many past tokens to use

2. **Verification Branch**: Verify promising n-grams
   - Match n-grams with generated tokens
   - Accept if first token matches

```python
class LookaheadDecoding:
    def __init__(self, model, window_size=15, ngram_size=5):
        self.model = model
        self.W = window_size  # Lookahead window
        self.N = ngram_size   # N-gram size

    def generate_step(self, tokens):
        # Lookahead branch: Generate W × N candidates
        candidates = {}
        for w in range(1, self.W + 1):
            for n in range(1, self.N + 1):
                # Generate n-gram starting at position w
                ngram = self.generate_ngram(tokens, start=w, length=n)
                candidates[(w, n)] = ngram

        # Verification branch: Find matching n-grams
        verified = []
        for ngram in candidates.values():
            if ngram[0] == tokens[-1]:  # First token matches last input
                if self.verify(tokens, ngram):
                    verified.append(ngram)

        # Accept longest verified n-gram
        return max(verified, key=len) if verified else [self.model.generate_next(tokens)]
```

**Performance**:
- Speedup: 1.5-2.3× (up to 3.6× for code generation)
- No draft model or training needed
- Works out-of-the-box with any model

## Method Comparison

| Method | Speedup | Training Needed | Draft Model | Quality Loss |
|--------|---------|-----------------|-------------|--------------|
| **Draft Model Speculative** | 1.5-2× | No | Yes (external) | None |
| **Medusa** | 2-3.6× | Minimal (heads only) | No (built-in heads) | None |
| **Lookahead** | 1.5-2.3× | None | No | None |
| **Naive Batching** | 1.2-1.5× | No | No | None |

## Advanced Patterns

### Training Medusa Heads

```python
from medusa.model.medusa_model import MedusaModel
from medusa.model.kv_cache import initialize_past_key_values
import torch.nn as nn

# 1. Load base model
base_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
    "lmsys/vicuna-7b-v1.3",
    torch_dtype=torch.float16
)

# 2. Add Medusa heads
num_heads = 4
medusa_heads = nn.ModuleList([
    nn.Linear(base_model.config.hidden_size, base_model.config.vocab_size, bias=False)
    for _ in range(num_heads)
])

# 3. Training loop (freeze base model for Medusa-1)
for param in base_model.parameters():
    param.requires_grad = False  # Freeze base

optimizer = torch.optim.Adam(medusa_heads.parameters(), lr=1e-3)

for batch in dataloader:
    # Forward pass
    hidden_states = base_model(**batch, output_hidden_states=True).hidden_states[-1]

    # Predict future tokens with each head
    loss = 0
    for i, head in enumerate(medusa_heads):
        logits = head(hidden_states)
        # Target: tokens shifted by (i+1) positions
        target = batch['input_ids'][:, i+1:]
        loss += F.cross_entropy(logits[:, :-i-1], target)

    # Backward
    optimizer.zero_grad()
    loss.backward()
    optimizer.step()
```

### Hybrid: Speculative + Medusa

```python
# Use Medusa as draft model for speculative decoding
draft_medusa = MedusaModel.from_pretrained("medusa-vicuna-7b")
target_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("vicuna-33b")

# Draft generates multiple candidates with Medusa
draft_tokens = draft_medusa.medusa_generate(prompt, max_new_tokens=5)

# Target verifies in single forward pass
outputs = target_model.generate(
    prompt,
    assistant_model=draft_medusa,  # Use Medusa as draft
    max_new_tokens=256
)

# Combines benefits: Medusa speed + large model quality
```

### Optimal Draft Model Selection

```python
def select_draft_model(target_model_size, target):
    """Select optimal draft model for speculative decoding."""
    # Rule: Draft should be 5-10× smaller
    if target_model_size == "70B":
        return "7B"  # 10× smaller
    elif target_model_size == "33B":
        return "7B"  # 5× smaller
    elif target_model_size == "13B":
        return "1B"  # 13× smaller
    else:
        return None  # Target too small, use Medusa/Lookahead instead

# Example
draft = select_draft_model("70B", target_model)
# Returns "7B" → Use Llama-2-7b as draft for Llama-2-70b
```

## Best Practices

### 1. Choose the Right Method

```python
# New deployment → Medusa (best overall speedup, no draft model)
if deploying_new_model:
    use_method = "Medusa"

# Existing deployment with small model available → Draft speculative
elif have_small_version_of_model:
    use_method = "Draft Model Speculative"

# Want zero training/setup → Lookahead
elif want_plug_and_play:
    use_method = "Lookahead Decoding"
```

### 2. Hyperparameter Tuning

**Draft Model Speculative**:
```python
# K = number of speculative tokens
K = 4  # Good default
K = 2  # Conservative (higher acceptance)
K = 8  # Aggressive (lower acceptance, but more when accepted)

# Rule: Larger K → more speedup IF draft model is good
```

**Medusa**:
```python
# Posterior threshold (acceptance confidence)
posterior_threshold = 0.09  # Standard (from paper)
posterior_threshold = 0.05  # More conservative (slower, higher quality)
posterior_threshold = 0.15  # More aggressive (faster, may degrade quality)

# Tree depth (how many steps ahead)
medusa_choices = [[0], [0, 0], [0, 1], [0, 0, 0]]  # Depth 3 (standard)
```

**Lookahead**:
```python
# Window size W (lookahead distance)
# N-gram size N (context for generation)

# 7B model (more resources)
W, N = 15, 5

# 13B model (moderate)
W, N = 10, 5

# 33B+ model (limited resources)
W, N = 7, 5
```

### 3. Production Deployment

```python
# vLLM with speculative decoding
from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams

# Initialize with draft model
llm = LLM(
    model="meta-llama/Llama-2-70b-hf",
    speculative_model="meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf",  # Draft model
    num_speculative_tokens=5,
    use_v2_block_manager=True,
)

# Generate
prompts = ["Tell me about AI:", "Explain quantum physics:"]
sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.7, max_tokens=256)

outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params)
for output in outputs:
    print(output.outputs[0].text)
```

## Resources

- **Medusa Paper**: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.10774
- **Medusa GitHub**: https://github.com/FasterDecoding/Medusa
- **Lookahead Decoding (ICML 2024)**: https://lmsys.org/blog/2023-11-21-lookahead-decoding/
- **Lookahead GitHub**: https://github.com/hao-ai-lab/LookaheadDecoding
- **Speculative Decoding Survey (ACL 2024)**: https://aclanthology.org/2024.findings-acl.456.pdf
- **Comprehensive Survey**: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07851

## See Also

- `references/draft_model.md` - Draft model selection and training
- `references/medusa.md` - Medusa architecture and training
- `references/lookahead.md` - Lookahead decoding implementation details

Attribution

KalarisLabsKalarisLabs
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from KalarisLabs →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report co...

502942 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

953191 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end p...

502941 votes

Literature Review

Assistance with writing literature reviews by searching for academic sources via Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref and PubMed APIs. Use when the user needs to find papers on a topic, get details for specific DOIs, or draft sections of a literature review with proper citations.

6511 votes
View all in research →