Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Readme Refresh?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/joshukraine-readme-refresh)
---
name: readme-refresh
description: Audit and update a project README, or bootstrap a new one. Detects tech stack, versions, and services.
---
# README Refresh
Audit and update the project README, or bootstrap one if it doesn't exist. The README is a living document — it evolves with the code and should always reflect the current state of the project.
## Command Options
- `--bootstrap`: Force bootstrap mode even if a README exists (useful to start fresh)
## Your task
### Step 0: Detect mode
- If `README.md` exists at the project root **and `--bootstrap` was not passed**: enter **Refresh mode** (Step 1).
- If `README.md` does not exist **or `--bootstrap` was passed**: enter **Bootstrap mode** (Step 5).
---
## Refresh Mode
### Step 1: Scan the project
Gather facts from the codebase. Do not rely on the README's current claims — verify independently.
**Tech stack and versions:**
- Ruby version: `.ruby-version`, `Gemfile.lock` (`RUBY VERSION` section), `.tool-versions`
- Rails version: `Gemfile.lock` (search for `rails (`)
- Node version: `.node-version`, `.nvmrc`, `.tool-versions`, `package.json` (`engines`)
- Database: `config/database.yml`, `Gemfile.lock` (pg, mysql2, sqlite3)
- Key framework gems/packages: Devise, Turbo, Stimulus, Tailwind, Solid Queue, etc. — scan `Gemfile` or `package.json` for notable dependencies
**Services and infrastructure:**
- Hosting: `fly.toml` (Fly.io), `netlify.toml`, `Procfile`, `render.yaml`, `app.json` (Heroku), `Dockerfile`, `docker-compose.yml`
- Storage: look for Active Storage config, S3/Tigris credentials in `config/storage.yml`
- Email: `config/environments/production.rb` (SMTP settings, `action_mailer` config), initializers for Postmark/SendGrid/etc.
- Background jobs: `config/application.rb` or initializers (Solid Queue, Sidekiq, etc.)
- Search: Elasticsearch, Meilisearch, etc.
**Available commands:**
- `bin/` directory: list executable scripts (`bin/rails`, `bin/dev`, `bin/ci`, `bin/setup`, etc.)
- `Procfile.dev` or `Procfile`: processes defined for local development
- `Makefile` or `Taskfile`: custom task definitions
- `package.json` scripts section
**Configuration requirements:**
- `.env.example` or `.env.template`: expected environment variables
- `config/credentials.yml.enc` or `config/master.key`: credentials setup
- `config/database.yml`: database setup requirements
**CI/CD:**
- `.github/workflows/`: GitHub Actions workflows
- `.circleci/`, `.travis.yml`, `Jenkinsfile`: other CI configs
### Step 2: Compare against the README
Read the current `README.md` and compare each claim against the facts gathered in Step 1. Build a findings report with three categories:
1. **Outdated** — the README states something that is no longer accurate (e.g., "Rails 7.1" when `Gemfile.lock` shows Rails 8.0, or mentions a service that has been removed).
2. **Missing** — something exists in the project that the README doesn't mention and reasonably should (e.g., a `bin/dev` script for local development, a background job processor, a CI workflow).
3. **Stale references** — commands, URLs, or setup steps that no longer work or point to things that don't exist.
Do **not** flag:
- Prose descriptions of what the app does (subjective — leave to the human).
- Stylistic preferences (heading structure, badge choices, etc.).
- Items that are genuinely optional to document.
### Step 3: Present findings
**CHECKPOINT**: Present the findings report to the user. Format:
```text
README Refresh — Findings
==========================
Outdated (N items):
✗ Ruby version: README says 3.3.0, project uses 4.0.1
✗ Rails version: README says 7.1, Gemfile.lock shows 8.0.1
✗ References Redis for caching, but project uses Solid Cache
Missing (N items):
+ bin/dev script not documented (starts Procfile.dev with foreman)
+ Postmark configured for transactional email — not mentioned
+ GitHub Actions CI workflow exists — not documented
Stale references (N items):
⚠ Setup step 3 references `rake db:seed` — project uses `bin/rails db:seed`
⚠ Link to API docs points to a 404
No issues found: (list any sections that are current and accurate)
```
Ask: **"Want me to apply the mechanical fixes? I'll update versions, add missing sections, and remove stale references. I won't rewrite prose descriptions."**
### Step 4: Apply fixes
For each confirmed finding:
- **Outdated versions/facts**: Update to the verified value from Step 1.
- **Missing sections**: Add a concise section with the verified information. Match the existing README's style and heading level conventions.
- **Stale references**: Fix or remove. If a command changed, update it. If a link is dead and no replacement is obvious, comment it out with a note.
After applying changes:
- Show a diff summary of what was changed.
- Do **not** commit automatically — let the user review and commit when ready (or offer to commit it for them).
---
## Bootstrap Mode
### Step 5: Scan the project
Run the same scan as Step 1 to gather project facts.
### Step 6: Detect project type and generate README
Based on the scan results, generate a README with these sections (omit any that don't apply):
1. **Project name and description** — use the repo name as a heading. Add a one-line placeholder: `<!-- TODO: Add project description -->`. Do not invent a description.
2. **Tech stack** — list detected language, framework, database, and key dependencies with verified versions.
3. **Prerequisites** — what needs to be installed before setup (Ruby, Node, PostgreSQL, etc.) with version requirements.
4. **Setup** — step-by-step local development setup based on what exists: `bin/setup`, `bundle install`, `bin/rails db:prepare`, `.env` configuration, etc. Only include steps that the project actually needs.
5. **Development** — how to run the app locally (`bin/dev`, `bin/rails server`, etc.), how to run tests, how to run the linter.
6. **Deployment** — if hosting config is detected (fly.toml, netlify.toml, etc.), document the deployment target and any relevant commands.
7. **Services** — external services the app depends on (email provider, object storage, background jobs, etc.).
8. **Documentation** — if a `docs/` directory exists, mention it and list key documents (PRD, domain model, etc.).
### Step 7: Present and write
**CHECKPOINT**: Present the generated README to the user for review.
Write the file to `README.md` at the project root. Do **not** commit — let the user review and commit when ready.
---
## Important
- This skill inspects and reports. It does not refactor code, change configuration, or install dependencies.
- Prose and subjective descriptions are the human's domain. The command handles mechanical, verifiable facts.
- The command is framework-aware but not framework-specific. The scan in Step 1 covers Rails, Node, Python, Go, Rust, and Hugo projects. For unrecognized stacks, fall back to checking common files (`Makefile`, `Dockerfile`, `docker-compose.yml`, `README.md`).
- When in doubt about whether something belongs in the README, include it in the findings report and let the user decide.
- If the project has a `CLAUDE.md`, read it for additional context about conventions, but do not document `CLAUDE.md` itself in the README (it is tooling-specific, not project documentation).
## Lifecycle Context
This is a **living-document maintenance** command (→ See `spec-driven-development.md` §5 "Document Lifecycle"). The README is never frozen — it evolves with the code.
| Project Stage | README Refresh Focus |
| ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Greenfield | Bootstrap mode. Generate initial README as setup docs solidify. |
| MVP complete | Full refresh. The README likely drifted during rapid development. |
| Mature | Light periodic refresh. Versions and dependencies are the main drift vectors. |
**Suggested cadence:** Run after phase boundaries, after `/update-deps`, or whenever the project feels like it has accumulated untracked changes. A good rule of thumb: if you'd be embarrassed for a new contributor to read the README, it's time.