Skip to content
Back to skills

Code Review

ASecurity

Deep code review skill. When triggered by '/code-review', '코드 리뷰', 'review this code', or '코드 품질 점검', this skill performs a thorough code quality review with structured findings, severity ratings, and actionable recommendations.

  • 9 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 1 copy
  • 9 views
  • Added October 23, 2026
code-qualitycode-reviewgitperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 23, 2026

npx -y skills add johnfkoo951/cmdspace-plugins --skill code-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Code Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Code Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/johnfkoo951-code-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/johnfkoo951-code-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: code-review
description: >
  Deep code review skill. When triggered by '/code-review', '코드 리뷰', 'review this code',
  or '코드 품질 점검', this skill performs a thorough code quality review with structured
  findings, severity ratings, and actionable recommendations.
---

# Code Review — Deep Quality Analysis

Performs thorough code quality review with structured findings.

## Workflow

### Step 1: Determine Review Scope

Use `AskUserQuestion`:

```json
{
  "questions": [
    {
      "question": "What should I review?",
      "header": "Scope",
      "options": [
        {"label": "Recent changes (Recommended)", "description": "Review uncommitted changes or recent commits"},
        {"label": "Specific files", "description": "Review specific files or directories you specify"},
        {"label": "Full project", "description": "Broad quality assessment of the entire codebase"},
        {"label": "PR review", "description": "Review changes in a pull request"}
      ],
      "multiSelect": false
    },
    {
      "question": "What aspects should I focus on?",
      "header": "Focus",
      "options": [
        {"label": "All aspects (Recommended)", "description": "Readability, performance, maintainability, best practices"},
        {"label": "Performance", "description": "Focus on performance issues, N+1 queries, memory leaks"},
        {"label": "Architecture", "description": "Focus on design patterns, SOLID principles, coupling"},
        {"label": "Readability", "description": "Focus on naming, structure, clarity"}
      ],
      "multiSelect": false
    }
  ]
}
```

### Step 2: Gather Code

Based on scope:
- **Recent changes**: Run `git diff` and `git status` to identify changed files
- **Specific files**: Read the specified files
- **Full project**: Dispatch explorer (Haiku) first, then review key files
- **PR review**: Use `gh pr diff` to get PR changes

### Step 3: Review

Dispatch **code-reviewer** (Sonnet) with the gathered code and focus area.

For "Full project" or "Architecture" focus, also dispatch **critic** (Opus) for deeper structural analysis.

### Step 4: Present Results

Present the code-reviewer's structured report with severity-rated findings.

If both code-reviewer and critic were dispatched, merge their findings into a single report with clear attribution.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

View all in code-quality →

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.