Translate technical security risk into business and financial terms — top risk scenarios, likelihood × impact, a risk register, and (where useful) quantified loss ranges (FAIR-aware) — to support executive decisions on treat/transfer/accept. Use to communicate or prioritize cyber risk for leadership.
Scanned 9/19/2026
npx -y skills add jassics/awesome-claude-security --skill cyber-risk-quantification --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Cyber Risk Quantification?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jassics-cyber-risk-quantification)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: cyber-risk-quantification
description: >-
Translate technical security risk into business and financial terms — top risk
scenarios, likelihood × impact, a risk register, and (where useful) quantified loss
ranges (FAIR-aware) — to support executive decisions on treat/transfer/accept. Use
to communicate or prioritize cyber risk for leadership.
---
# Goal
Cyber risk expressed the way executives make decisions: which scenarios matter, what
they could cost the business, how that compares to risk appetite, and what to do
(treat / transfer / accept).
# Steps
1. **Identify risk scenarios** — concrete, business-relevant loss events (e.g.
"ransomware halts operations for N days", "breach of customer PII") rather than raw
vulnerabilities. Derive from `threat-modeling`, findings, and threat intel.
2. **Estimate likelihood and impact** — qualitative (heat map: likelihood × impact)
and, where the decision warrants, quantitative loss ranges (a FAIR-style estimate:
frequency × magnitude, expressed as a range, not false precision).
3. **Compare to appetite** — plot residual risk against the org's stated risk
appetite/tolerance; flag what exceeds it.
4. **Recommend treatment** — for each significant risk: mitigate (and the control +
cost), transfer (insurance/contract), or accept (with owner and sign-off).
5. **Maintain the register** — owner, current vs. residual risk, treatment, status,
review date; track trend over time.
# Output
A risk register + a heat map, plus quantified top risks (loss ranges) where relevant,
and treatment recommendations. Use `security-reporting`; visualize the heat map with
`security-diagramming:infographic`. Feeds `security-strategy` and `board-deck`.
# Notes
Quantify in ranges, not false precision — "likely $2–8M annual loss exposure" beats a
single fabricated number. Frame risks as business loss scenarios, not CVEs. Tie every
significant risk to an explicit treatment decision and an accountable owner; accepted
risk must be consciously accepted, not defaulted.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!