Guides Angular performance work through evidence, measurement, hypothesis, minimal change, and re-measurement before refactoring.
Scanned 10/2/2026
npx -y skills add janpereira-dev/ngAutoPilot --skill angular--performance--measure-before-optimizing --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Angular Performance Measure Before Optimizing?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/janpereira-dev-angular-performance-measure-before-optimizing)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
id: angular.performance.measure-before-optimizing
name: Angular Measure Before Optimizing
description: >
Guides Angular performance work through evidence, measurement, hypothesis, minimal change, and re-measurement before refactoring.
stack:
- Angular
- TypeScript
- JavaScript
category: performance
status: stable
version: 0.10.0
owner: NgAutoPilot
triggers:
- measure before optimizing
- performance evidence
- Angular DevTools
- Lighthouse
- Web Vitals
- performance profiling
compatibility:
angular:
min: "2"
recommended: "12+"
---
# Angular Measure Before Optimizing
## Purpose
Use this skill to make Angular performance work evidence-based. The goal is to identify the real bottleneck, apply the smallest useful change, and re-measure before introducing complexity.
## Compatibility
This skill applies to all Angular versions. Tool choice depends on the project and environment:
- Browser Performance panel for CPU, rendering, and interaction issues.
- Network panel for request and loading issues.
- Lighthouse and Web Vitals for page experience.
- Angular DevTools when available for component and change detection insight.
- Bundle analysis output when initial load or dependency weight is suspected.
## When to Use
Use this skill when:
- The performance symptom is vague.
- The user wants to optimize before there is evidence.
- Multiple bottlenecks are possible.
- A proposed optimization adds complexity.
- A previous optimization did not improve user-visible behavior.
## Do
Use a measurement workflow:
```txt
1. Define the symptom.
2. Reproduce it.
3. Measure CPU, network, bundle, render, or interaction cost.
4. Identify the bottleneck.
5. Form a hypothesis.
6. Apply the smallest compatible change.
7. Re-measure.
8. Document the result and residual risk.
```
Match symptoms to evidence:
```txt
slow initial load -> bundle, network, Lighthouse, Web Vitals
input lag -> Performance panel, interaction profiling
scroll jank -> rendering and scripting flame chart
excessive rendering -> Angular DevTools, component inspection
duplicated API calls -> Network panel and RxJS flow review
large dependency cost -> bundle analyzer
```
## Do Not
Avoid performance work based only on guesses:
```txt
The app feels slow, so add OnPush everywhere.
```
Avoid accepting a more complex implementation unless it improves a concrete metric or removes a clear risk.
Avoid optimizing cold paths while the user-visible bottleneck is elsewhere.
## Review Checklist
- [ ] The symptom is stated clearly.
- [ ] The issue is reproducible.
- [ ] The likely bottleneck class is identified: CPU, network, bundle, rendering, memory, or interaction.
- [ ] Evidence exists before refactoring.
- [ ] The proposed change targets the measured bottleneck.
- [ ] The change is minimal and compatible with the Angular version.
- [ ] The result is re-measured.
- [ ] Added complexity is justified by measurable benefit.
## Expected Output
1. State the symptom and available evidence.
2. Identify missing measurements if evidence is weak.
3. Form a technical hypothesis.
4. Recommend the smallest next action.
5. Define the metric expected to improve and the risk of the change.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!