Skip to content
Back to skills

Reflection

ASecurity

Automatic quality check on significant outputs via isolated sub-agent. Spawns reflection-agent for objective evaluation without conversation context bias.

  • 9 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added September 9, 2026
code-qualitygogitapisecurity

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 10 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 9, 2026

npx -y skills add ilandahan/AID --skill reflection --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Reflection?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Reflection
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ilandahan-reflection/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ilandahan-reflection)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: reflection
description: Automatic quality check on significant outputs via isolated sub-agent. Spawns reflection-agent for objective evaluation without conversation context bias.
---

# Reflection Skill

Apply (spawn agent): code, architecture, PRD, specs, tests, plans, APIs, schemas.
Skip: simple questions, status checks, file reading, clarifying questions, help.

The sub-agent gets NO conversation context. It evaluates purely on merit — inline evaluation shares your context, agrees with your reasoning, and trends to 10/10. The agent sees only output + request + WHY, and can verify claims in source files.

## Process

1. Extract isolation variables (below).
2. Spawn reflection-agent with isolated inputs.
3. Parse JSON response.
4. If pass=false and revisions<3: apply guidance, re-evaluate.
5. Display Quality Check box.

## Context Extraction (CRITICAL)

Extract these for the agent. Do NOT summarize or add context.

| Variable | How to Extract |
|---|---|
| `{{ORIGINAL_REQUEST}}` | First user message that initiated this task - **VERBATIM** |
| `{{STATED_WHY}}` | The WHY established at conversation start - **EXACT TEXT** |
| `{{PHASE_NUMBER}}` | Read from `.aid/state.json` → `current_phase` |
| `{{PHASE_NAME}}` | Read from `.aid/state.json` → `phase_name` |
| `{{OUTPUT_TO_EVALUATE}}` | Your draft output (code, spec, etc.) |
| `{{FILES_TO_VERIFY}}` | Read content of all files your output references/modifies |
| `{{PHASE_CRITERIA}}` | Read from `criteria/phase-{N}-{name}.yaml` |

DO: copy original request exactly as user wrote it; copy stated WHY exactly as established; include ALL files the output references (not just some); load criteria from the YAML file.

DO NOT: ❌ summarize the request; ❌ explain your decisions; ❌ include conversation history; ❌ mention previous attempts; ❌ add "helpful context".

## Spawn Command

```
Task(
  subagent_type: "general-purpose",
  model: "opus",
  prompt: [Load ../../agents/reflection-agent.md, replace variables],
  description: "Objective quality evaluation"
)
```

## Quality Check Display Format

After receiving agent response, display:

```
╭─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
│ 🔍 Quality Check                                            │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                             │
│  [icon] WHY Alignment     X/10   [agent's note]             │
│  [icon] Phase Compliance  X/10   [agent's note]             │
│  [icon] Correctness       X/10   [agent's note]             │
│  [icon] Security          X/10   [agent's note]             │
│  [icon] Completeness      X/10   [agent's note]             │
│                                                             │
│  ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════     │
│  📊 Overall: X.X/10                                         │
│  STATUS: [agent's status]                                   │
│                                                             │
│  [If revised: 📝 Improvements: ...]                         │
│                                                             │
╰─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
```

## Score Icons

| Score | Icon |
|---|---|
| 8-10 | ✅ |
| 6-7.9 | ⚠️ |
| 0-5.9 | ❌ |

## Revision Handling

If agent returns `pass: false`:

1. Read `revision_guidance.required_changes`
2. Apply changes to your output
3. Re-spawn agent with updated output (max 3 attempts)
4. Track improvements: `"Security 5→8/10 Fixed: Added input validation"`

## Session Review Mode

On project load or `/good-morning`, spawn session review instead:

```
Task(
  subagent_type: "general-purpose",
  model: "opus",
  prompt: [Load ../../agents/reflection-agent.md],
  description: "Session review - outside perspective"
)
```

Session review variables:
- `{{STATE_JSON}}` - Content of `.aid/state.json`
- `{{CONTEXT_JSON}}` - Content of `.aid/context.json`
- `{{RECENT_CHANGES}}` - Output of `git log --oneline -10`
- `{{RECENT_FILES}}` - Output of `git diff --stat HEAD~5`
- `{{PHASE_CRITERIA}}` - Current phase criteria YAML

## Commands

| Command | Action |
|---|---|
| `/reflect` | Show detailed breakdown of last evaluation |
| `/reflect --session` | Run session review |
| `/reflect --strict` | Run evaluation with threshold 8.0 |

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.extended.md13.1 KB
  • SKILL.md4.8 KB
  • criteria/phase-0-discovery.yaml2.5 KB
  • criteria/phase-1-prd.yaml2.5 KB
  • criteria/phase-2-tech-spec.yaml2.6 KB
  • criteria/phase-3-impl-plan.yaml9 KB
  • criteria/phase-4-development.yaml3.4 KB
  • criteria/phase-4a-code-design.yaml3.9 KB
  • criteria/phase-4b-code-function.yaml5 KB
  • criteria/phase-5-qa-ship.yaml3.7 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.