Skip to content
Back to skills

Conductor Validator

ASecurity

'Validates Conductor project artifacts for completeness,

  • 8 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added November 7, 2026
developmentbashrailstesting

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned November 7, 2026

npx -y skills add huytran1120/vietnam-agentic-skills --skill conductor-validator --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Conductor Validator?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Conductor Validator
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/huytran1120-conductor-validator/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/huytran1120-conductor-validator)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: conductor-validator
description: 'Validates Conductor project artifacts for completeness,

  consistency, and correctness. Use after setup, when diagnosing issues, or

  before implementation to verify project context.

  '
risk: safe
source: community
date_added: '2026-02-27'
---

# Validate Conductor workflow artifacts

## When to Use
Inspect a project that actually uses a `conductor/` workflow directory after setup, before resuming a track, or when diagnosing inconsistent plans/status. This is distinct from the Rails Conductor desktop-app setup (`conductor.json`/`script/server`).

## Read-only discovery

```bash
# Run from the explicitly selected project root; missing paths are findings, not permission to create them.
ls -ld conductor/ conductor/tracks/
ls conductor/index.md conductor/product.md conductor/tech-stack.md conductor/workflow.md conductor/tracks.md
```

## Validation procedure

1. Read current project instructions and the actual configured Conductor workflow/version.
2. Compare the declared artifact list with the project’s real files; report missing, unreadable and extra artifacts separately.
3. Resolve local index/track links, track IDs and plan/status markers against their referenced content. Do not assume directory presence proves completeness.
4. Reconcile completed markers with recorded implementation/test evidence and the current revision; report stale or conflicting state without inventing a pass.
5. Output a concise list of file, observed inconsistency, expected contract and proposed correction. Apply fixes only when requested; preserve existing plans and dirty work.

No implementation-playbook file or runnable validator script is bundled. The procedure above is the complete local guide; optional project-specific automation must actually exist and be reviewed before execution.

## Pattern Matching

**Status markers in tracks.md:**

```
- [ ] Track Name  # Not started
- [~] Track Name  # In progress
- [x] Track Name  # Complete
```

**Task markers in plan.md:**

```
- [ ] Task description  # Pending
- [~] Task description  # In progress
- [x] Task description  # Complete
```

**Track ID pattern:**

```
<type>_<name>_<YYYYMMDD>
Example: feature_user_auth_20250115
```

## Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.