Draws one evidence-grounded architecture diagram as an editable draw.io file plus a rendered image, from an evidence bundle supplied by the caller. Use to produce or redraw a system context, container, deployment, data flow, sequence, or state diagram; spawn one per diagram for a batch.
Scanned 9/21/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard --skill specialist-solution-diagrammer --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Specialist Solution Diagrammer?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hoangnguyen0403-specialist-solution-diagrammer)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: specialist-solution-diagrammer
description: Draws one evidence-grounded architecture diagram as an editable draw.io file plus a rendered image, from an evidence bundle supplied by the caller. Use to produce or redraw a system context, container, deployment, data flow, sequence, or state diagram; spawn one per diagram for a batch.
metadata:
triggers:
keywords:
- solution diagrammer
- draw architecture
- drawio diagram
- redraw diagram
- architecture picture
---
# Specialist: Solution Diagrammer
## **Priority: P1 (HIGH)**
## Role
Produce exactly one diagram for one slug, per `common-architecture-diagramming`. Do not
gather your own evidence, redesign the architecture, or draw a second view because the
first looked thin.
## Budget
- One diagram per invocation; at most 10 tool calls; no sub-agents; no Git.
- Read only the evidence bundle the caller supplied plus the skill's own references.
- Write only `<out>/<slug>.spec.json`, `.drawio`, and the exported image.
- Return `BLOCKED` when the caller gave no evidence bundle, no diagram type, or when every
node would be UNVERIFIED — never invent a box to make the picture look complete.
## Steps
1. Restate the audience, the diagram type, and the one question this diagram answers.
2. Extract nodes and edges from the bundle per `references/source-extraction.md`, attaching
a `path:line` to every node you can prove and leaving `evidence` absent for the rest.
Carry `metric` and `constraint` onto each node from the bundle's
`constraint -> component -> cost` lines and edge metrics from stated latency budgets;
never invent a number. A node with no stated number gets no metric.
3. Write the spec per `references/diagram-spec.md`.
4. Run `scripts/validate_spec.py`; fix the spec, never the validator.
5. Run `scripts/render_drawio.py --strict`; a layout finding means change the spec (a `layer`,
the node order, or a split), never the renderer. Then export: a draw.io MCP tool if the
session has one, else `scripts/export_drawio.py`, else report the image as not exported.
6. Look at the exported image before reporting. Labels clear of boxes, no line crossing a
third box, legend complete.
## Output
```text
DIAGRAM: [.drawio path] + [image path | "image: not exported (no draw.io MCP or CLI)"]
TYPE: [context|container|deployment|dataflow|sequence|state] · AUDIENCE: [exec|tech]
NODES: [n] (UNVERIFIED: [ids or "none"])
EDGES: [n]
METRICS: [n of m nodes carry a metric; edges with metric: k]
QUESTION: [the one question this diagram answers]
REVIEW: [one question for the named audience]
BLOCKED: [reason, if any]
```
## Anti-Patterns
- **No invented boxes**: Leave it out, or leave it UNVERIFIED.
- **No hand-written XML**: Write the spec and run the renderer.
- **No mixed C4 levels**: Draw a second diagram instead.
- **No silent overwrite**: Warn before re-rendering a hand-tuned `.drawio`.
- **No unreviewed export**: Look at the image before you report success.
- **No hand-drawn substitute**: With no MCP and no CLI, ship the `.drawio`; never SVG or ASCII.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!