Skip to content
Back to skills

Plan Feature

ASecurity

Plan a feature from BRD-lite brief or clear intent into PRD (What), decisions, implementation plan, and task slices.

  • 549 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 8 views
  • Added June 6, 2026
developmentgorailsfrontendbackendsecurityperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 3, 2026

npx -y skills add HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard --skill plan-feature --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Plan Feature?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Plan Feature
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/hoangnguyen0403-plan-feature/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hoangnguyen0403-plan-feature)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: plan-feature
description: "Plan a feature from BRD-lite brief or clear intent into PRD (What), decisions, implementation plan, and task slices."
metadata:
  internal: true
  triggers:
    keywords:
    - plan feature
    - workflow
---
# Plan Feature Skill

> [!IMPORTANT]
> Plan a feature from BRD-lite brief or clear intent into PRD (What), decisions, implementation plan, and task slices.

Optional args: slug=<feature>, ticket=<id/url>, mode=interactive|autonomous|channel, channel=<id>, auto_continue=true|false, profile=business|hybrid|technical.

## Instructions

When the user asks to perform this workflow, execute the following steps:


# Feature Planning Workflow (PRD / What)

Goal: Produce a PM-owned decision-complete PRD, delivery plan, and IT Department handoff before code starts.

## Steps
1. Load context:
   - Load baseline PRD section and search `docs/brd/` for the matching `[slug]`; if multiple candidates exist and intent is unclear, ask the user to choose/input the target slug.
   - Load BRD-lite, ticket text, existing specs, repo patterns, `common-product-requirements`, `common-operator-profile`, `common-decision-discipline`, `quality-engineering-business-analysis`, and matched framework skills.
   - Carry forward `operator_profile`, `lane`, `snc_tier`, `approval`, BRD objective IDs, SMART metric, scope fence, assumptions, evidence ledger, glossary, risks, and delivery context.
2. Interview:
   - Draft a provisional PRD direction from current context before asking.
   - Ask only for business logic, scope, constraints, and acceptance criteria that cannot be inferred.
   - Ask max 3 blocking decisions at a time; include a recommended default and 2-3 options for each.
   - Treat non-critical unknowns as explicit assumptions.
   - Confirm problem statement, assumptions, target users, JTBD/use cases, platforms, data, analytics, security, performance, rollout, and non-goals.
   - Confirm each requirement has owner, priority, and status.
   - Confirm success metrics and guardrails that must not regress.
   - Stop when requirements are actionable.
3. Draft PRD:
   - Save to `docs/prd/prd-[slug].md` when file writes are allowed.
   - Keep "what" separate from "how".
   - Add stable requirement IDs and AC IDs.
   - Use Given/When/Then AC when behavior can be misread.
   - Check user stories for specific persona, business value, INVEST, happy path, edge path, and negative path.
   - Link each requirement back to BRD-lite business objective.
   - Include risk categories, rollout/ops, decision log, analytics/telemetry, and changelog.
   - Mark unresolved blocking product decisions as blockers.
   - Include a RACI table for BA, PM, architect, backend, frontend, mobile, QA, release, and business/UAT approver when more than one delivery role is involved.
4. Create implementation plan:
   - Define components, contracts, data changes, migrations, risks, and verification.
   - Slice work into fresh-context tasks.
   - Map each task slice to requirement IDs, AC IDs, likely owner role, repo/module, expected artifact, and verification lane.
   - Estimate each slice (t-shirt size + confidence); roll up a delivery-window range in time/cost terms for `operator_profile=business`, points otherwise.
   - Identify whether `design-solution` is required before coding.
5. Route:
   - Continue when assumptions are non-critical; return BLOCKED for missing owner, untestable AC, approval, or release constraint.
   - Architecture unclear -> `design-solution`; approved build-ready plan with AC IDs and trace -> `implementation-readiness`.

## Runtime Contract
- Use after BRD-lite or when clear feature intent exists but PRD does not.
- Required inputs: BRD-lite or equivalent intent, plus enough context to name users, goals, and constraints.
- Return BLOCKED only for missing owner, untestable AC, approval, or release constraint.
## Handoff Payload
- `slug`, `operator_profile`, `lane`, `snc_tier`, `approval`, PRD path, `REQ-*`, `AC-*`, decisions, RACI, rollout notes, task slices, delivery-window estimate, verification plan, outcome report, next workflow.
## Blocking Questions
- Ask max 3 at a time with a recommended default and 2-3 options.
## Output Template
```md
# Feature Plan: [Name]
## PRD
## Problem Statement
## Goals And Guardrails
## Personas / JTBD
## Use Cases
## Requirement Trace
## User Stories And ACs
## Decisions
| Decision   | Choice   | Reason   |
| ---------- | -------- | -------- |
| [decision] | [choice] | [reason] |
## RACI / IT Department Handoff
## Analytics / Telemetry
## Risks And Assumptions
## Rollout / Ops
## Implementation Plan
## Task Slices And Delivery Estimate
## Verification Plan
## Outcome Report
{schema_version: 1, run_id: "[run-id]", slug: "[slug]", workflow: plan-feature, feature_status: requirements_ready, started_at: "[timestamp]", completed_at: "[timestamp]", requirement_trace: {brd_objectives: [], requirements: [], acceptance_criteria: [], srs: []}, completed_evidence: [], missing_evidence: [], decision_needed: [], recommended_next_workflow: design-solution, cost: {source: unavailable}, agent: {identity: "[agent-identity]", model: "[model]"}}
## Next Workflow
design-solution | implementation-readiness
## Cost Report
Call `get_session_cost(workflow="plan-feature")` before final handoff.
```

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.