Guides users through writing a strong skill: trigger conditions, core guidance, examples, anti-patterns.
Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding
Scanned 9/27/2026
npx -y skills add gethamster/skills --skill authoring-skills-from-scratch --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Authoring Skills From Scratch?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/gethamster-authoring-skills-from-scratch)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: authoring-skills-from-scratch
description: "Guides users through writing a strong skill: trigger conditions, core guidance, examples, anti-patterns."
version: "1.0.0"
category: "Ops"
---
# Authoring Skills from Scratch
A skill is behavioral guidance for the AI harness — domain-specific instructions loaded into context to shape how the harness approaches specific types of work.
## What makes a strong skill?
**When to use** — Trigger conditions: what types of tasks or code patterns activate this skill. Good: "When creating or reviewing feature flags in PostHog or code." Bad: "When working on the backend."
**Core guidance** — Behavioral rules the harness should follow. Prescriptive, not suggestive. Good: "Flag names follow the pattern `feature_<name>_<variant>`." Bad: "Consider using a consistent naming pattern."
**Concrete examples** — Real code or configuration showing the pattern in action. 2–3 examples minimum. Good: `feature_passwordless_auth_alpha`. Bad: No examples, only prose.
**Anti-patterns** — What NOT to do, with explanations of why. Often more valuable than positive guidance. Good: "`ff_auth_v2` — too cryptic, doesn't follow naming pattern." Bad: Omitted.
## How to write one
1. **Define trigger conditions first:** What types of tasks or code patterns should activate this skill? Be specific — name the tools, file paths, or task types.
2. **Write core guidance as prescriptive rules:** "Always do X" is better than "consider doing X." Each rule should be a single, testable instruction.
3. **Add 2–3 concrete examples:** Show the pattern in real code or configuration. Examples should be copy-pasteable and recognizable.
4. **Document anti-patterns:** What should the harness NOT do? Why? For each anti-pattern, explain the failure mode it prevents.
5. **Test the skill:** Load it and give the harness a task that should trigger it. Does it follow the guidance? If not, tighten the trigger conditions or rules.
Keep the skill under ~2000 words. If it exceeds that, it's probably covering multiple domains — split it.
## Common mistakes
- Too long, covering multiple domains. A skill for "all of backend development" is too broad; create separate skills for "NestJS patterns," "BullMQ job queues," etc.
- Vague guidance. "Consider" and "think about" are not instructions. Use "always," "never," "must."
- No examples. Without concrete examples, the harness applies the rules inconsistently.
- Duplicating blueprint content. Skills guide behavior; blueprints describe state. A skill says "follow this pattern when writing API routes." A blueprint says "our API routes use this pattern because we decided X."
- No trigger conditions. Without triggers, the harness doesn't know when to load the skill.
## Prompts to get unstuck
- "What tasks should activate this skill?"
- "What's the one rule the harness must follow?"
- "Show me a real example of this pattern."
- "What mistake does the harness make without this skill?"
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!