Skip to content
Back to skills

Elixir Thinking

ASecurity

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement a feature in Elixir", "refactor this module", "should I use a GenServer here?", "how should I structure this?", "use the pipe operator", "add error handling", "make this concurrent", or mentions protocols, behaviours, pattern matching, with statements, comprehensions, structs, or coming from an OOP background. Contains paradigm-shifting insights.

  • 180 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added February 8, 2026
developmenttestingdebuggingrefactoringapi

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned February 12, 2026

npx -y skills add georgeguimaraes/claude-code-elixir --skill elixir-thinking --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Elixir Thinking?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Elixir Thinking
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/georgeguimaraes-elixir-thinking/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/georgeguimaraes-elixir-thinking)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: elixir-thinking
description: This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement a feature in Elixir", "refactor this module", "should I use a GenServer here?", "how should I structure this?", "use the pipe operator", "add error handling", "make this concurrent", or mentions protocols, behaviours, pattern matching, with statements, comprehensions, structs, or coming from an OOP background. Contains paradigm-shifting insights.
---

# Elixir Thinking

Mental shifts required before writing Elixir. These contradict conventional OOP patterns.

## The Iron Law

```
NO PROCESS WITHOUT A RUNTIME REASON
```

Before creating a GenServer, Agent, or any process, answer YES to at least one:
1. Do I need mutable state persisting across calls?
2. Do I need concurrent execution?
3. Do I need fault isolation?

**All three are NO?** Use plain functions. Modules organize code; processes manage runtime.

## The Three Decoupled Dimensions

OOP couples behavior, state, and mutability together. Elixir decouples them:

| OOP Dimension | Elixir Equivalent |
|---------------|-------------------|
| Behavior | Modules (functions) |
| State | Data (structs, maps) |
| Mutability | Processes (GenServer) |

Pick only what you need. "I only need data and functions" = no process needed.

## "Let It Crash" = "Let It Heal"

The misconception: Write careless code.
The truth: Supervisors START processes.

- Handle expected errors explicitly (`{:ok, _}` / `{:error, _}`)
- Let unexpected errors crash → supervisor restarts

## Control Flow

**Pattern matching first:**
- Match on function heads instead of `if/else` or `case` in bodies
- `%{}` matches ANY map—use `map_size(map) == 0` guard for empty maps
- Avoid nested `case`—refactor to single `case`, `with`, or separate functions

**Error handling:**
- Use `{:ok, result}` / `{:error, reason}` for operations that can fail
- Avoid raising exceptions for control flow
- Use `with` for chaining `{:ok, _}` / `{:error, _}` operations

**Be explicit about expected cases:**
- Avoid `_ -> nil` catch-alls—they silently swallow unexpected cases
- Avoid `value && value.field` nil-punning—obscures actual return types
- When a case has `{:ok, nil} -> nil` alongside `{:ok, value} -> value.field`, use `with` instead:

```elixir
# Verbose
case get_run(id) do
  {:ok, nil} -> nil
  {:ok, run} -> run.recommendations
end

# Prefer
with {:ok, %{recommendations: recs}} <- get_run(id), do: recs
```

## Polymorphism

| For Polymorphism Over... | Use | Contract |
|--------------------------|-----|----------|
| Modules | Behaviors | Upfront callbacks |
| Data | Protocols | Upfront implementations |
| Processes | Message passing | Implicit (send/receive) |

**Behaviors** = default for module polymorphism (very cheap at runtime)
**Protocols** = only when composing data types, especially built-ins
**Message passing** = only when stateful by design (IO, file handles)

Use the simplest abstraction: pattern matching → anonymous functions → behaviors → protocols → message passing. Each step adds complexity.

**When justified:** Library extensibility, multiple implementations, test swapping.
**When to stay coupled:** Internal module, single implementation, pattern matching handles all cases.

## Data Modeling Replaces Class Hierarchies

OOP: Complex class hierarchy + visitor pattern.
Elixir: Model as data + pattern matching + recursion.

```elixir
{:sequence, {:literal, "rain"}, {:repeat, {:alternation, "dogs", "cats"}}}

def interpret({:literal, text}, input), do: ...
def interpret({:sequence, left, right}, input), do: ...
def interpret({:repeat, pattern}, input), do: ...
```

## Defaults and Options

Use `/3` variants (`Keyword.get/3`, `Map.get/3`) instead of case statements branching on `nil`:

```elixir
# WRONG
case Keyword.get(opts, :chunker) do
  nil -> chunker()
  config -> parse_chunker_config(config)
end

# RIGHT
Keyword.get(opts, :chunker, :default) |> parse_chunker_config()
```

Don't create helper functions to merge config defaults. Inline the fallback:

```elixir
# WRONG
defp merge_defaults(opts), do: Keyword.merge([repo: Application.get_env(:app, :repo)], opts)

# RIGHT
def some_function(opts) do
  repo = opts[:repo] || Application.get_env(:app, :repo)
end
```

## Idioms

- Process dictionary is typically unidiomatic—pass state explicitly
- Reserve `is_thing` names for guards only
- Use structs over maps when shape is known: `defstruct [:name, :age]`
- Prepend to lists `[new | list]` not `list ++ [new]`
- Use `dbg/1` for debugging—prints formatted value with context
- Use built-in `JSON` module (Elixir 1.18+) instead of Jason

## Testing

**Test behavior, not implementation.** Test use cases / public API. Refactoring shouldn't break tests.

**Test your code, not the framework.** If deleting your code doesn't fail the test, it's tautological.

**Keep tests async.** `async: false` means you've coupled to global state. Fix the coupling:

| Problem | Solution |
|---------|----------|
| `Application.put_env` | Pass config as function argument |
| Feature flags | Inject via process dictionary or context |
| ETS tables | Create per-test tables with unique names |
| External APIs | Use Mox with explicit allowances |
| File system operations | Use `@tag :tmp_dir` (see below) |

**Use `tmp_dir` for file tests.** ExUnit creates unique temp directories per test, async-safe:

```elixir
@tag :tmp_dir
test "writes file", %{tmp_dir: tmp_dir} do
  path = Path.join(tmp_dir, "test.txt")
  File.write!(path, "content")
  assert File.read!(path) == "content"
end
```

Directory is auto-cleaned before each run. Works with `@moduletag :tmp_dir` for all tests in module.

## Common Rationalizations

| Excuse | Reality |
|--------|---------|
| "I need a process to organize this code" | Modules organize code. Processes are for runtime. |
| "GenServer is the Elixir way" | Plain functions are also the Elixir way. |
| "I'll need state eventually" | YAGNI. Add process when you need it. |
| "It's just a simple wrapper process" | Simple wrappers become bottlenecks. |
| "This is how I'd structure it in OOP" | Rethink from data flow. |

## Red Flags - STOP and Reconsider

- Creating process without answering the three questions
- Using GenServer for stateless operations
- Wrapping a library in a process "for safety"
- One process per entity without runtime justification
- Reaching for protocols when pattern matching works

**Any of these? Re-read The Iron Law.**

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.