Skip to content
Back to skills

Paper Citation Verify

ASecurity

Use when checking manuscript citations: bibliography hygiene, DOI/PMID completeness, placeholders, BibTeX key mismatches.

  • 10 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 24, 2026
researchrustgo

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 29, 2026

npx -y skills add FOURTEEN1416/academic-agent-toolkit --skill paper-citation-verify --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Paper Citation Verify?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Paper Citation Verify
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/fourteen1416-paper-citation-verify/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/fourteen1416-paper-citation-verify)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: paper-citation-verify
description: "Use when checking manuscript citations: bibliography hygiene, DOI/PMID completeness, placeholders, BibTeX key mismatches."
---

# Citation Verifier

## Overview

Use this skill when citation integrity is the bottleneck. It is narrower and more operational than general writing skills: the goal is to catch unverifiable references, missing identifiers, duplicated BibTeX keys, placeholder citations, and mismatches between local citation artifacts before they become submission problems.

Use this skill together with `scientific-writing` or `submission-audit`, not instead of them.

## When To Use

Use this skill when:
- a manuscript is close to submission or resubmission
- the bibliography may contain placeholders, guessed entries, or stale metadata
- a `.bib` file needs a hygiene pass
- the draft mixes DOI, arXiv, PMID, or plain-text references inconsistently
- you need to verify that local citation artifacts are ready before manual or online source verification

Do not use this skill for:
- generic literature discovery from scratch
- full manuscript restructuring
- venue formatting that does not depend on citation integrity

## Local First Pass

Start with a local citation scan before any online verification.

The upstream helper script is **not bundled with this repo**(ACAT-GOVERNANCE:上游脚本未随本仓库集成,
原宿主安装路径已废弃,不可直接调用,2026-08-29 审计标记;2026-09-23 宿主中性化改写)。
Run the scan directly instead. Look for:
- `[CITATION NEEDED]` or similar placeholders
- `PLACEHOLDER_...` citation keys
- `TODO: verify` markers
- DOI, arXiv, and PMID tokens
- LaTeX `\cite{...}` keys
- duplicate BibTeX keys inside `.bib` files

Treat imported BibTeX and Google Scholar-style exports as draft metadata, not as verified truth.

## Verification Order

1. Scan the local draft and bibliography artifacts.
2. Remove or flag all placeholder citations.
3. Check BibTeX-key uniqueness and obvious identifier gaps.
4. Normalize metadata fields that are commonly wrong in copied BibTeX:
   - author list and spelling
   - year
   - venue or journal name
   - volume, issue, pages, or article number
   - DOI versus preprint identifier
5. For every citation that matters to a scientific claim, verify the paper exists in trusted sources.
6. If a claim depends on a specific result, confirm the cited paper actually supports that claim.
7. Only then finalize formatting for the venue.

## Trusted Verification Sources

Prefer this order when moving beyond local scans:
- publisher page or DOI resolver
- PubMed for biomedical papers
- arXiv for preprints
- Crossref or Semantic Scholar for metadata cross-checking
- Google Scholar only as a fallback discovery aid, not as the sole source of truth

## Common Failure Modes

- writing BibTeX from memory
- leaving placeholder citation keys in the draft
- assuming an arXiv preprint and published version are interchangeable
- citing a paper correctly but using it to support a claim it does not make
- letting duplicate BibTeX keys silently overwrite entries
- blindly trusting copied Scholar or BibTeX metadata for venue names, pages, years, or DOI fields

## Output Standard

When using this skill, report:
- placeholder or unverifiable items
- duplicate or suspicious BibTeX keys
- missing or inconsistent DOI/arXiv/PMID information
- suspicious metadata fields that need manual correction
- claims that still need source verification
- the minimum safe next step before submission

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…